Title: "Tiananmen Square memorial in Second Life."
General strikes are illegal, but the people are being driven to desperate measures by the superrich, ultra-rich who cut taxes for themselves, and use socialism to bailout their investments while they insist upon the most draconian capitalism for even the poorest of the poor. The superrich are further insisting upon taking all the wrong energy and environmental steps that will further ruin the planet upon which everyone must live and which is the rightful inheritance of all. They have started wars for personal profit and are continuing wars and oppressive occupations also for their personal profit. They are now fomenting new wars and plan to expand existing wars all for extremely selfish reasons. The U.S. economy is slipping into the tank while they just plan to waste more and more of the entire Earth.

Well, people are going to become desperate and they aren't going to sit on their hands. As I've written many times before, the powers that be are playing with fire and they are going to get burned if they don't repent.

Yes, the powers that be direct the military. Yes, the military is being woven into the domestic scene. However, what those myopic powers or self-authorized rulers don't seem to comprehend is that the military is made up of people with relatives who are being hurt by all the wrong-headed policies and practices of those rulers.

So now, beginning with the truck drivers (who have demonstrated before that they know how to act in unison, even brotherly and sisterly solidarity) are calling for a worldwide general strike.

It short notice, but it will have an impact. It doesn't take long for the word to spread around the globe anymore. If the truckers shut down and park their rigs in various places they could shut down everything. They could very easily cut off all the rich rulers from being free to move around and to conduct business. Even the military if it were to follow orders from on high couldn't clear away all the trucks and truckers. Would they follow such orders and destroy the lives of their own brothers and sisters and other relatives for the sakes of continuing the corrupt rule of the superrich plutocrats? The U.S. isn't the China of the Tiananmen Square Massacre.

Also, the truckers are calling upon non-truckers to strike as well. If the September 2008 strikes have an impact, they will plan bigger and deeper strikes until they get what they want.

If you're wondering why this is happening, it's happening because of the neocons. They come pretending to be for global democracy when in reality they are for their own supremacy so that all others will serve them as lords and masters of the universe. That's the evil spirit that has caused this awful state of affairs.

Well, I call for peace everywhere. I call for the Golden Rule. I call for service, and that includes that the plutocrats must repent.

Why keep increasing hardship when you can do exactly the opposite and improve everyone's life including your own by extension. What goes around, comes around, as they say. What goes around doesn't have to be evil. What goes around could be love instead.

No matter how bad strikes might be on some people, the evil rulers have the greater sin.

Source: Updates for Truckers Shut-down


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.