If you follow the $100-200 million McCain fortune, you end up at the Mob. John McCain's wife, Cindy Lou Hensley, is the daughter of Jim Hensley. Jim founded an Anheuser-Busch distributorship in Arizona. Jim was a lieutenant of Kemper Marley who was in turn a lieutenant of Meyer Lansky (Jewish Mafia) who was a partner of the Bronfman family of Montreal. This all has its roots in the Prohibition Era and bootleg liquor. Lansky and the Bronfman family supplied even Al Capone. Many rich families made their fortunes off illegal liquor smuggling. The Kennedy Family did for instance. Extremely unsavory types were involved. There were many mob wars for crime territory. It still goes on but more so undercover.

When Prohibition ended, the Mob had the channels already in place and tons of money to go right into the business of legalized booze.

Kemper Marley was the boss of Arizona. (Arizona had/has many "retired" mobsters.)

John McCain knew exactly what he was doing when he picked Cindy for his second wife even while he was still married to his first wife. He knew her connections and the doors those connections could open. With his father and grandfather being each 4-star admirals and with his fabricated and manipulated war record, he knew he could buy his way into the Congress and then Senate.

Dead Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, William Rehnquist, had been Marley's and Jim Hensley's lawyer in Arizona. Think about that. Think about how the Court appointed George W. Bush President while Rehnquist was the Chief Justice.

The Arizona network (Mob) was into all sorts of rackets. Marley took over the Las Vegas spot of Bugsy Siegel after Siegal was murdered on orders of Lansky. Also, investigative-reporter Don Bolles was blown up in his car in 1976 for investigating and reporting on the Arizona-Jewish Mob.

Now, who does not know that John McCain has radically changed his image over the course of this current campaign for the White House? He's not the man he was back in 2000. He's adopted many of the positions he claimed to despise in 2000. He has been courting the Zionists with a passion. He's allegedly being financed by the Rothschild family of London.
Source (Libertarian, nationalist site; Not consistent with the RLCC)

What's going on is exactly what it looks like.

Is this malicious gossip? No it is not. The reason to be bringing these things out is not to do harm to anyone, quite the contrary. John McCain is not being repentant at all. He wants to have the power of the office of President vested in him. There is nothing wrong with informing the people that they are making a huge error in choosing either McCain or Obama. It is right to warm the people away from terrible choices. If they heed, they will suffer less. Also, if John McCain repents, his soul will be better off. The same applies to Barack Obama.

The people need to come to realize openly that the system is inherently flawed. The system was very poorly conceived. It completely ignores the calling of Jesus for each person to serve in peace, sufficiency, and purity of heart. What we have instead is greed, violence, and the corruption of unbridled lusts of all kinds. It's wrong and has to end. Fortunately, many people, including many Jews, are working to bring in a new system.

Many of those Jews don't know what to bring in, but many will end up seeing the light of Jesus.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.