FOLLOW THE MONEY, BUT WHAT IF THEY WON'T LET YOU? They can't stop you in general, and that's all you really need. They can stop you from obtaining the details, unless everyone demands to know those details. However, unless you're duped enough to falsely imagine that you're going to fix the system, having the tiniest details doesn't matter. What matters is seeing the fruits of the system and looking at those who are on top of that upside-down system. That informs you of who has benefited the most by the most despicable system that is the system. No one gets to the top of that system without grossly compromising righteousness. Your problem is in coming to realize that.

They spend billions on trying to convince everyone that they are the good guys. They are not. No one is, but they certainly are not. Only that which is perfect is truly good. Everything else is corrupted to a relative degree rendering it less than perfect of truly good. What the superrich do is deal in the promotion of connotations and the death of other connotations so that people's perception won't even be able to include considering what good truly means. It's understandable how this happens, but it isn't good. Reverse it.

Right before 9/11, people were buying options so that they would make a fortune on airlines stocks going down. The 9/11 Commission didn't dig into this, because to have done so would have meant uncovering those behind the attacks, those with prior knowledge who allowed it to go forward for their own private, special advantage and privilege at the expense of everyone else: The dupes or suckers.

Right before the housing collapse, the man who later hired Alan Greenspan, bought options such that he made billions of dollars upon the collapse. He knew what Greenspan claims Greenspan didn't know, yet he then went and hired Greenspan. Right, hire the guy who knows less than you do to give you more advice.

Right before Bear Stearns crashed, someone or some group bought $1.7 million in options (puts or futures) and then sold them after the crash for some $250 million. People who are professional options traders are saying that no one would have made that "bet" without knowing what was going to happen. The Chicago Board of Options Exchange has so far refused to divulge who made the trade or trades.

What that means is that the Chicago Board of Options Exchange knows who knew in advance that Bear Stearns was going to show itself to be bankrupt. So, who's paying whom how much to cover up, and why would you if you are in your right mind, want to continue on with any faith in the evil system rather than taking steps to create the system that will displace that one with righteousness for once since the beginning?

Now, this all is what I've been writing about for years now. The whole economic system is nothing but a scheme set up by crooks and liars. The only intelligent thing to do with it is ditch it for the political economy devised by God and spoken and exemplified by Jesus. That's one of the reasons he is the Messiah.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.