Candidate who wants Olmert's job once 'sought deaths of 70 Palestinians a day'
By Donald Macintyre in Jerusalem
Friday, 1 August 2008
If this is true, and we have no reason to disbelieve it at this point, it is a very sad state of affairs that this person is in consideration by anyone to lead Israel.
What is as bad or worse is that Benjamin Netanyahu of the fascist Likud Party is the leading candidate in Israel to take over as Prime Minister. Any nation that chooses Benjamin Netanyahu to lead it in light of all the recent revelations about the evils of the Anglo-American-Israeli Empire deserves its self-appointed fate.
Friday, September 5, 2008
Alaskans Speak (In A Frightened Whisper): Palin Is "Racist, Sexist, Vindictive And Mean
The Progressive Curmudgeon
Is Sarah Palin a racist? We aren't for malicious gossip. We're against it. None of what is written though is inconsistent with conservative Republicanism in general, of course. Why would anyone expect Sarah Palin to be any different from other conservative Republicans? I use the term conservative here in a blended neocon and paleocon sense.
What is to be expected from anyone who thinks the invasion of Iraq, that everyone knows was based on lies made up from whole cloth, is a Holy War and occupation, a medieval Christian Crusade? What is to be expected from anyone who prays to God for corporatist oil and gas pipelines for Alaska or elsewhere? What is to be expected from anyone who thinks global warming isn't human induced from burning carbon-based fuels? What is to be expected from anyone who thinks Alaska's polar bear population isn't endangered by excessive selfish-human activity?
Isn't this woman in bed with the oil corporations all the way and over the real needs of the poor and planetary wellbeing in general?
She comes from a church where the pastor said anyone who isn't for George W. Bush is going to Hell. She hasn't denounced that. Here's Bush who has lied and lied and lied about 9/11, terrorism, war, weapons, torture, spying, law, the environment, taxes, and more, and yet John McCain is attracting the same voters for the same reasons really.
There's John McCain who it is said was tortured and who said that he is opposed to torture but who couldn't bring himself to stand against the CIA's continuing use of torture.
What kinds of people torture people? Sick people is the answer. John McCain and the rest of them are saying "Country First." No, it's God First. Anyone who says "Country First" is lost in the dark and incapable of leading anyone into the light.
I'm not for or against Barack Obama any more than I'm for or against John McCain. What nonsense it is though to point to the Alaskan National Guard for purposes of stating that Sarah Palin is ready to command the Pentagon. Don't get me wrong, I don't think there is any such thing as being prepared to command the Pentagon. I want the Pentagon to disappear, and it will. I wish it were already gone. The point though is that it's ridiculous to point to the Alaskan National Guard as preparatory. All governors have that background, and Alaska has a tiny population to boot. Also, the idea that because Russia is across the Bering Strait from Alaska, Palin somehow has foreign-policy experience is likewise ludicrous. Regardless though, foreign-policy experience means nothing if the person is wrong-hearted. What matters is ultimate intelligence, not just experience.
Nearly 600,000 Subject to Possible Caging in Ohio
How many voter-registration mass mailers are "returned to sender" in the run-up to Election Day may determine how many Ohio residents are eligible to vote.
By: David Rosenfeld | September 05, 2008
A single returned piece of mail is not a reliable basis for challenging the right to vote," Judge said. "Mail may be returned for many reasons, including errors in the database from which the mailing is derived, errors in the mailing labels, failure to include an apartment number or poor matching criteria. — Donita Judge, Ohio staff attorney for the nonprofit Advancement Project.
From a purely secular standpoint, how can the system rightly deregister voters based upon undeliverable mail? Many people do temporary forwarding addresses. Many people live in more than one place but have legal voting rights in just one of those places. Before anyone is removed from any voter registration rolls, there need to be other steps taken to insure that the removal doesn't remove someone who has done nothing wrong.
By Carl Weinberg
Wed Sep 3, 9:35 AM ET
So, oil prices are coming down just in time to help the incumbent party in the White House. That was predicted. If the incumbent is oil-giant friendly, it's a given that high prices will fall for the election. Then what will happen right after the election? Will Iran get clobbered? Is that the plan? They don't want to do it before the election, because it would make so many people extremely more upset with the Republicans.
by Daphne Benoit
Sat Sep 6, 7:57 PM ET
Poor Haiti, the people are so poor that they eat mud pies just to stave off hunger pangs. They suffer storm after storm, all made worse due to deforestation. The roots of trees hold the land in place from becoming mudslides. The trees and other forest vegetation also suck up rain water. Without the trees, it's Hell.
Also, Haiti has been kicked around by the U.S. and France for centuries. It's the poorest nation in the Americas, but the U.S. just kicks it down every time anyone there tries to lift it up even a little. Why is that? Is it just pure racism or what?
So there they are, dying or living in abject poverty and suffering from voodoo superstitions, etc., while America is responsible for more global warming than is any other nation so far and the cause therefore of the increasing violence of the hurricanes bearing down on Haiti. Will the people of Haiti ever get a break? Pray for them.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)