Tornados in Siberia

Fannie and Freddie nationalised - let's take over the rest
By Mick Brooks
Monday, 08 September 2008
Socialist Appeal

What's missing from this analysis is the fact that the whole bubble and bailout was planned in advance. The idea that the superrich don't play chess out more than one move is asinine. The bailout is the bleeding of the lower and middle classes for the sakes of the superrich in the world banks.

Ban on Political Endorsements by Pastors Targeted
By Peter Slevin
Monday, September 8, 2008; A03
The Washington Post

A group of so-called conservative pastors are going to endorse John McCain from their pulpits to test the 1954 amendment to the Internal Revenue Code forbidding such activity by tax-exempt religious organizations.

Where does the RLCC come down on this? The RLCC has no part in the secular nor it in us. The pastors for and against this plan are acting within the system to control that system. That's not consistent with the teaching of Jesus Christ.

The RLCC is not in favor of any separation of Church and state. In fact, the Church is the proper state. The secular is false-hearted and will fall. The real state will displace it with every member voluntarily choosing that real state ever after.

The Fannie/Freddie Bailout: The End of the Beginning of the End
By Michael E. Lewitt
John Mauldin's Outside the Box

I'm glad to read that some mainstream capitalists get it that the current economic crisis was caused by evil minds.

Sarah Palin's Demon Haunted Churches - The Complete Edition
By Bruce Wilson
Mon Sep 08, 2008 at 11:43:32 AM EST
Talk to Action

McCain has picked a Reconstructionist/Dominionist as his running mate. From the outset in creating this website, I said clearly that the Reconstructionists/Dominionists are the most dangerous people in the world. I wrote about it at length in "There is No Such Thing as a Conservative, Republican Christian: Jesus is a small-c communist."

The last thing the world needs is a Reconstructionist/Dominionist President of the United States. There is a real danger here that Sarah Palin as Vice President could become President. It is bad enough that John McCain may become President. Palin has a religious zeal for a Christian Holy Crusade against the Muslims.

Things are just getting worse. Obama is a wind-testing false Zionist as well. What a mess this world is in.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.