As promised a couple of comments ago, I want to address the issue of interest rates and a couple of other matters (I might do in additional post so this one won't be huge).


Beginning with interest rates, the Federal Reserve is lowering rates. It is doing that in coordination with the other major central banks in the world. This is to make renting money less expensive. It is to make renting money alluring, tempting, etc. The idea is to re-prime the pump. The idea is to stimulate the circulation of money. There are other ways to do it, historically proven ways so far being avoided. The money-changers wanted to get as much free money from the people's so-called representatives as possible before the people gained too much momentum in stopping the wasteful and fraudulent bailout.


What other ways are there to prime the pump? The New Deal showed plenty. Spend on public works. Have the public sector hire and pay people to do public works. That means the people (the government) hires the people. The people hire each other. They hire themselves to build things in which they all share equal ownership. Public works are collectively owned. The U.S. super highway system is an example.

The government, the people, all own those roads. Through their representatives (at least this is how it is supposed to work as far as the people are told), the people make the rules concerning those roads. Driving down them is free, per se. There are costs associated with driving on them of course. There are no tolls, per se, however.


The privatizers want to change all that though. They want to make a profit by excluding the poor from being able to drive down the public roads that those privatizers want to make private, of course. It's a terrible idea. It's an evil idea. It's a selfish idea. It will not make the roads better or cheaper in general. I guarantee that's the truth.


Now, the government can also contract for the public works with private contractors who hire the unemployed to do the work. That was done during the New Deal in many cases. The government though was an employer where the private sector couldn't hire up enough workers. Frankly, we need full employment, and that's where interest rates come in here.


When everyone is working, workers have more say over how much they are paid. They are more valuable in the mundane, capitalistic sense. Employers supposedly can't afford to be without them or to have a hole that is more expensive to fill where the potential employee may demand more before agreeing to work. He or she will just go elsewhere since there are other job openings.

By raising interest rates and making business contract, workers are laid off. The pressure on wages and salaries goes down. The rich are then in a more powerful position to demand more work for less and less pay.

When more workers have jobs, wages usually go up. Employers raise prices to cover the cost of higher wages. More people have more money to buy more things and manufacturing things usually lags demand. Hence, prices of goods and services go up for that reason too. That's inflation.


Another way inflation occurs is by printing more money than needed or more money than productivity suggests would keep prices stable. That second thing is what is happening right now as unemployment is also increasing.


The dollar is going to keep falling on account of it and for other reasons as well. Prices are going to continue rising. People are going to continue losing jobs. More unemployed people are going to be chasing fewer and fewer jobs and be willing to work for less and less just to eat. The ultra-rich will be slavishly served, just the way they want it. People will be willing to suffer all sorts of indignities to eat, just the way the superrich want it.


This won't last though. Some prices will go down as demand falls but supply and inventories remain relatively high. Oil is a prime example. It is always one of the first indicators of how things are about to go over the subsequent few years (yes, it can take years). Historically, if you watch oil and construction you can read the signs of the economic times. That has to change though due to global warming. The oil rich hate this.

Now, all the rate cutting will slowly attract the timid and fearful back into the economy. They will find it difficult, because the economy will still be sluggish, as planned, as foreseen, as milked.


The economy will start to heat up. When employment numbers rise, the interest rates will be jacked up to slow wages. The bankers will reap the profits. Those who planned it all, their families (oligarchs, plutocrats), who consolidated more during their planned-and-caused downturn, will be that much richer relative to everyone else, they think.


This is no natural business or economic cycle we're going through. It's a planned happening. It's the imperialist, banker chess masters cleaning out the competition that they set up for the kill in the first place. Trust me. That's the mentality.


It doesn't take many at the so-called top to be that way to have caused all of this to happen. It doesn't matter that billions below think it isn't possible that anyone can or does conspire on that level. When it comes to the Alexander the Great syndrome, there are people who will assert their will over others no matter the expense to the general welfare or well-being of all the others on the planet. It's competition, and the biggest ego (megalomaniac) wins (loses if you believe Jesus, as I do).

Stop falling for the idea that those at the top of the money pyramid are sentimental about the common people to the degree that they will forego wealth, power, and control for the sakes of those common folk. One just doesn't get to the top of the current worldly system by being a good person. It doesn't happen. It can't happen. The rules don't allow for it. The Machiavellians made the rules. The only way to "win" is to join them or change the system. It's the changing the system part that scares them to death, literally.

Are those people devoid of humanity? It depends upon how you view it. From Jesus's perspective, they don't know him and he doesn't know them. They live and feel in a different universe even while Jesus does acknowledge their pain and suffering and takes no joy in it but rather takes joy in the relief of the righteous downtrodden.

It isn't Jesus's fault that the unrighteous are unrighteous and get what they set up in their ignorance that they falsely imagine is clever.


The right system is the Christian Commons Project™. It is a step in the progression toward the conflation of Heaven and Earth, both New. It is not the wrong direction. We can move through it to the level of faith shown by the feeding of the five thousand and beyond, as Jesus said.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.