The U.S. Treasury under Henry Paulson is now rolling out a little more of the plan. He wants $250 billion U.S. taxpayer dollars to buy into U.S. private banks with few strings attached. That later part is important to understand, because he will be back for more money later with more strings attached.
You see, first he got $700 billion of the tax payer's money for the private banks with zero equity for the people. That's while the Federal Reserve gave out $850 billion without much notice. They gave plenty of it to non-banks too. Now Paulson's giving a little equity stake for more money that is far, far, far from enough to get the economy rolling again within the fractional-reserve system that they froze up on purpose. They froze it up so that this very incremental plan could be rolled out where the junk investments would be replaced by the future labor value of the common workers. Those workers are losing their houses, jobs, and pensions, etc., all to throw them into fear so they will do what their told about the supposedly too-complicated economy. It's all a sham. It's as clear and plain as can be. Who can't see it?
The banks need/want many trillions, even tens of trillions, not just 700 billion here and 250 billion there. Their junk was ballooned up to tens of trillions. They want it all replaced and then some, all on the backs of the workers their system keeps down and too busy working to study the matter and to have any say in how things are being run globally.
Gordon Brown said that "...we [the governments] didn't understand [what] was happening, because we had no idea of the risks that people were taking." What a flat out lie. He was the finance minister, Chancellor of the Exchequer, of Britain for ten years while all this stuff was unfolding. He knew. He and all the rest of them were told, just the way they were all told that the Iraq invasion would lead to a quagmire occupation. It has been a total, unmitigated disaster by those who like to breakup other nations so they may rule. They love destabilizing things. Their hearts are evil.
What really has to happen to set things straight is to completely do away with private central banking. The currency, if there is one, must be handled interest free by the government that absolutely doesn't issue more or less money than productivity suggests so that there is zero inflation or deflation due to money-supply fluctuations. As for what people will pay for things, that's a different matter.
Frankly, money is an error. The only thing that is needed or ever has been needed is people at the grassroots making consensus decisions based upon the Golden Rule and more so the New Commandment. That's the agreement or social contract the people need.
It has always been a mistake to trade. People should never have held out for selfish reasons. Selfishness is the great sin. It is the root of all evil. Money came out from selfishness and the love of money comes out from it.
There is no need for a medium of exchange between immediate family members. All that is needed is for humanity to value every human being the same way it values any human being including self. That's what Jesus teaches, in case you didn't know. Most people realize it, of course. They're all just waiting for everyone else to step forward though. That will never work.
The brave must step forward first.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)