Monday 17 November 2008
Tara McCormack
Now, at last, we know the truth about Georgia
The myth of a plucky republic being 'ethnically cleansed' by an evil Russian regime was just that: a myth.

"NYT says, 'The accounts suggest that Georgia's inexperienced military attacked the isolated separatist capital of Tskhinvali on 7 August with indiscriminate artillery and rocket fire, exposing civilians, Russian peacekeepers and unarmed monitors to harm.'"

This is propaganda. It's making excuses. It's saying that it was inexperience that caused the targeting. It's a lie. The Georgians were guided by the U.S. and Israel. All the targeting was guided by hi-tech means from space. Georgia didn't roll in blind. They went in to set up a pretext for attacking Russia in the press and driving public opinion in the West against Russia and for more U.S. military presence on land, sea, and air in Eastern Europe — plain and simple.

Georgia has also been heavily armed by America, under the auspices of the 'war on terror', and has been encouraged to hope for membership of NATO.

Israel — you forgot Israel. What are you afraid of? Are you worried about being called and anti-Semite by Political Zionist warmongers and land thieves? Israel was deeply involved every step of the way.

Western policy in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus is helping to fuel local tensions and promote instability, and for no definable strategic purpose.

This is hogwash. The strategy is exactly as I've said from the very moment events began unfolding in South Ossetia. It's all part of the Grand Chessboard of Empire building.

Your article is way too timid. You've barely scratched the surface of the truth.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • Well there's the conspiracy theory of history and the cockup theory of history.

      I generally prefer the cockup theory unless there is overwhelming evidence for the conspiracy theory.

      And the Georgian military, or their political bosses, must have been very inexperienced if they thought Russia wouldn't protect South Ossetia.

    • @Steve Hayes -

      Hi Steve,

      Yes, I know you believe that cockup (something done badly) idea. I agree with you about it. Evil turns people to do things badly, but evil is still a conspiracy.

      In this particular case though, they did know Russia would step in. They also did know what they were targeting. The Israelis had been there working with them for months and months. The U.S. had conducted war games with them too. U.S. advisors were in the country at the time of the invasion. Both the U.S. and Israel had funded Georgia with billions of dollars in equipment, including hi-tech surveillance drones.

      The Military-Industrial Complex is built upon hot and cold wars both large and small. Greedy corporations that make hundreds of billions of dollars in weapons, etc., (more than the rest of the world combined) do not want that flow to stop.

      They need enemies. They create them via, among other methods, perception management. The last thing they want is world peace forever.

      They knew Russia would react. They were counting on it. It was all planned in advance including the propaganda campaign in the U.S. mainstream media demonizing Russia as returning to the bad-old Soviet/Stalinist days, which is an out-and-out lie (unless they can be driven to it by the U.S. and Israeli neocons).

      Everything the neocons planned was designed around causing increased fear in Americans, and others secondarily. They want Americans clamoring for security through military might (mammon for the Pentagon budget).

      Follow the money, Steve. Follow it to the root cause. It's pure evil. Think about Jesus and what he went through on account of the greed and violence of the selfish souls at the top of the upside down worldly world.

      That world still exists. It's constantly falling, but it's still right here. Jesus exposed it and set in motion its ultimate demise, but that last fall hasn't happened yet. You and I are facing the very same evil that spiked our beloved brother to the cross for telling the truth about the evil machinations and utter hypocrisy of those who placed themselves in power (stole the rightful inheritance of the true-hearted heir).

      Blessings to you, Steve. Visit and comment anytime.

      Your brother,

      Tom Usher