The True Cost of Coal
November 27, 2008

Traditionally considered the cheapest fuel around, the market price for coal ignores its most significant impacts. These so-called "external costs" manifests themselves as damages such as respiratory diseases, mining accidents, acid rain, smog pollution, reduced agricultural yields and climate change. The harm caused by mining and burning coal is not reflected in its price per tonne or its costs for a kWh of electricity, but the world at large is nevertheless paying for it. This report seeks to answer the question: just how much are we paying?

All these other costs are term externalities. It's a term to dupe. What's external when we live on one planet?


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • @The Hitmeister -

      Hello Hitmeister,


      You are on the right track looking out into the future as to cause and effect and also with realizing that we are reaping what was sown long ago.

      The knowledge that shortsighted souls damage the environment goes as far back as possible.

      The selfish and thoughtless spirit passes on its disease, even itself, generation to generation from the first careless use of Creation until now and, you are right, into the future until the power that is over all matter corrects the errors for the worthy.

      And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.

      (Revelation 11:18 KJVR)

      If you also read Gilgamesh (before Moses, chronologically speaking) and read between the lines, you will find the struggle between pristine wilderness and the thoughtless kind of human development.

      This whole topic is inextricably tied to the Great Commandments, the Golden Rule, and the New Commandment. Jesus is certainly an environmentalist who is though also rightly certain that God can and will set things right.

      We cannot truly love anyone if we destroy the environment. Destroying the environment now for the sake of gain in mammon is fleeting and dooms the souls who do it. They will have had their reward, meaning they will get for a while here but then also find themselves suffering the consequences of selfishness that comes back around.

      Capitalists are so-called risk takers. Many are gambling that Marx was right that there is nothing beyond the material world. Those capitalists who believe in consciousness after this level here on Earth though are often just looking to their current fiscal quarter. They close their eyes concerning what is down the road. They want theirs now and rationalize away the collision that they are driving toward at ever increasing speeds and reckless steering.

      There is power in existence that can instantly correct all errors. We ate from the proverbial tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Now we are challenged with coming to truly know good from evil and then with eating of the proverbial tree of life (real life).

      God bless your eyes with ever-increasing clear vision. May God give you a powerful voice for proper change.

      Come again.

      Tom Usher

    • What is even worse is that these environmental "externalities" are going to effect the world 50 years from now, and the ones we are experiencing now is from 50 years ago to the start of the industrial revolution. Even if we did stop right now, the effects will still be there for another 50-100 years. So when is the right time to go "green"? . . . 50-100 years ago . . .