Republic Windows and Doors, Chicago
The workers who took over the factory at Republic Windows and Doors in Chicago are being somewhat supported by Barack Obama. That's good on a certain level. The thing is that this factory isn't an auto factory in 1930's Michigan.
What I want to impress upon people is that this Window and Door factory apparently isn't planned for a reopening any time soon, if ever. This isn't a strike. These workers were laid off.
Therefore, what we need is a change of systems. The dog-eat-dog system has to go. We don't need bottom-up competition. We need top-down and bottom-up cooperation such that by the time all is said and done, no one will be able to tell who's at the top or bottom because everyone will be viewed as equally valuable, as human siblings.
Huge Milk Corporations Bullying Horse and Buggy Mennonite Dairy Farmers
The Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, at the bidding of corporate, crony-capitalist bullies, has used police teams against horse and buggy Mennonites for selling raw milk (that isn't hurting anyone) to friends. Just think of that. It's fascism. The police team descended on Mennonites, taking their dairy equipment, confiscating their milk, and who knows what else, and arresting a family's peaceful father all because the Mennonites are doing what they've done since they began, giving their children raw milk, which is extremely healthy relative to cow's milk loaded with bovine growth hormones, antibiotics, and synthetic vitamins and also killed by pasteurization.
Did you know that clean raw milk is alive with beneficial bacteria? It's just like live cultures in yogurt.
The corporations hate this. They want all milk to go through them. That's why they lobbied to force through needless regulations (there are good rules and bad rules).
There are other ways to determine that milk is safe. It doesn't have to be killed.
These particular Mennonites drink raw milk. They don't get sick from it. That's obvious. The whole corporate milk thing is a Big Lie. Why are Mennonites not dropping like flies if their milk is bad and dangerous? Anyone who ignores this is false-hearted. I hate it. The corporate-capitalist dominance over humanity has to go. It will go.
Chemical Pollution is Feminizing Vertebrate Males Including Humans
"," by Geoffrey Lean. The Independent. December 7, 2008.
This is happening all over the world. It doesn't matter whether we're talking about the wilderness or not. The chemicals created by the insane capitalist (selfish rather than unselfish) economy are creating havoc. They are evil created by those who have turned to the dark side. The statistics and species impacted and how they are impacted is awful.
The article doesn't address homosexuality but sticks to the subject of feminization. An interesting aspect here though is that science says some homosexual males have an overabundance of testosterone relative to average heterosexual males. Hormones certainly do play the central most-immediate (as in nearest) role in what is called gender and sexual orientations. Apparently, testosterone isn't simply masculinizing. Too much testosterone seems to overshoot the peak in natural masculinity. The balance is disturbed.
Chemicals react to environmental/behavioral changes. The environment when viewed as the whole universe of inputs (material and spiritual) upon and within humanity, certainly determines orientation absent overriding divine intervention.
If pollution is causing more of what the article calls gender bending (and that is certain), then in such cases, such particular gender bending clearly is a disease caused by artificial-chemical pollution and is the doing of the chemical companies, including pharmaceutical.
George W. Bush Hedging on God and Jesus: No Literalism Now
George W. Bush gamed the Fundamentalists and conservative-Republican so-called evangelists. I don't mean he gamed the elite. I mean he gamed (deceived via omission) the grassroots — those in the pews.
Now that he's at the bottom of the barrel in terms of approval, now that he sees the political writing on the wall that Rove and he were fleeting, as he knew he would spend and over spend all his political capital he had stolen, he has decided to change positions, just as so many others are for a while they think, shifting their positions from laissez-faire to regulation and nationalization.
He is helping the auto industry even while Senate Republicans rejected helping them. This is very similar to Olmert speaking truths he avoided before his corruption was exposed.
Sometimes such events with political leaders are genuine. It has been extremely rare though. Most often, the politicians are simply engaged in more false-hearted perception manipulation. They soon revert to their true stripes in public and never really change them in private among fellow criminals.
Bush says now that the Bible is probably not literal. (See: Raw Story.)
Imagine had he said that 9 and 10 years ago.
Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich
They bring down governors, senators, representatives, and others, but no one talks about national insanity. The system is insane. It's coming apart at the seams.
In case you have not been informed, Blagojevich has been caught on tape allegedly in what is called the "pay-to-play" game in U.S. politics. As a prime example of this, recall Tom DeLay.
Politics is a money-making machine for the players in this game. If you want a favor, show the money or other mutual favors, not because the cause is good or just but simply as a raw bribe. It's called governmental corruption. The big payers are the biggest corporations headed by the richest of the rich in the end: The plutocrats (bankers).
This is why the bankers have received the most in the bailout that they caused on purpose to result in the bailout ("good" money, as in the labor of the lower classes, replacing garbage they spewed out) to ruin others to consolidate more toward greater monopoly by the oligarchs (richest most secretive families.
High school seniors are refusing to join the military to go abuse Palestinians. These 18- and 19-year-olds are facing prison.
(See: "Shministim: Leader's in the Way to a New Israel," by Eileen Fleming. WAWA Blog December 12, 2008.)
Eileen Fleming is so determined to speak the truth she knows that she has been banned from certain so-called "liberal" mega-sites on the Internet.
High school students have been rioting all over the country against the fake socialist (extremely coercive) government that is really just a dictatorship no better than a blatantly rightwing dictatorship in the eyes of those youths. The youths are upset by the police killing people with impunity. The most recent flare-up was touched off by the police murdering an unarmed 15-year-old boy.
Days of rioting in Greece have left dozens injured and hundreds of premises burned to the ground as citizens vent their anger at the shooting of a 15-year-old boy by police officers. Chris Wherlock, who has been participating in the protests in Thessaloniki, recounts how what began as a peaceful demonstration against police brutality turned into full-scale civil unrest.
Guardian Weekly. December 11 2008.
Here's another view that is much less mainstream and very much worth reading on account of it:
"," by Nikos Raptis. ZNet. December 12, 2008.
Nikos relates the history, as many of his fellow youths see that history.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)