ANTI-NEW WORLD ORDER VIDEO ALMOST RIGHT; WORTH WATCHING AND DISCUSSING

There are two things that stand out the most concerning where the video is wrong.

First, there really are evil spirits at work that do transcend the flesh. That's not to say that the video is wrong that the Illuminati system is a spiritual fake. It is. Briefly, the system is headed by those who actually for the most part don't believe in spirit. Nevertheless, they are doing the bidding of that evil spirit, again, mostly unbeknownst to them.

Second, the world population has grown beyond what it should have. Covering nearly the continent of Australia with ¼-acre plots sounds like there is plenty left over. However, with the so-called technological quality of life we are living, one must factor in the roads and the acreage for producing and storing, etc., all the goods. Of course, we don't need every bit of the tech we are developing. In fact, we shouldn't be developing most of it but should be much more selective and thoughtful about what we are doing.

Those two things are the typical errors of certain of the libertarians who further the exposure of this version of the New World Order the most. Other than that, the video is mostly correct. It is most correct when it says that the main problem is with bad management.

Most of the things the video says are things I've written long ago on this site. It's not really news except for the numbers of people who are still unaware.

To clarify though, the real New World Order is a good thing. The video actually hints at it. The Christian Commons is the real New World Order.

I don't know what the rest of the video purports. Perhaps we'll see. (Source: Euro Yank.)

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • You and I should discuss some things in private at your convenience sometime

      since I cant view the video where I am now, I dont know what it is, but you and I might see eye to eye on a few things, and possibly be well opposed in others. It could be a worthy conversation

      • Mattathias, the gift of Yahoveh,

        Share openly.
        Live up to your name not in the mundane only.
        Well opposed is on one side.
        Turn, and see the light for the first time again.

    • [I don't understand why Disqus didn't merge the following comment from my database. It's still there as follows:]

      Matt Oxley
      ragingrev.com
      Submitted on 2009/01/23 at 2:07:00 AM

      You and I should discuss some things in private at your convenience sometime

      since I cant view the video where I am now, I dont know what it is, but you and I might see eye to eye on a few things, and possibly be well opposed in others. It could be a worthy conversation

      [My response was:]

      Tom Usher
      realliberalchristianchurch.org
      Submitted on 2009/01/23 at 1:50:11 PM | In reply to Matt Oxley.

      Mattathias, the gift of Yahoveh,

      Share openly.
      Live up to your name not in the mundane only.
      Well opposed is on one side.
      Turn, and see the light for the first time again.