I'm going to take a little time today to elaborate a bit on the video I posted yesterday.

Videos and books and articles that mention the Illuminati and the New World Order (NWO) are often instantly met with steering away without any effort having been made at dissection. This is especially true for several reasons and in several places in particular.

First of all, there are truths contained in the vision presented that others do not want the general public to consider. All manner of psychological ploys are used to steer people into imagining that the entire message in such videos, etc., are to be summarily rejected from even a moment's thought else one may be even ever so slightly contaminated by that for which he or she will be marked for endless ridicule and dismissal and rejection, etc. This is a result of conditioning. It comes as a result of a lifetime of what in the ivory towers of academe (both religious and secular) is termed "the socialization process." That brings me to the next aspect I mentioned above: Places.

It is in the ivory towers primarily where the psychology is spun to the highest degree. It is there that the quickest and deepest dismissal takes place. To understand this, it is necessary to step back to look at the big picture.

The Academy runs on money. The whole Illuminati/NWO (hereafter I/NWO) presumption is based upon money — who controls its creation and takes what cut and when. If that basic I/NWO presumption is correct, and it is, then it necessarily follows that those who control the money can control the purse strings down to the nth degree wherever and whenever they choose to exercise such micromanaging detail.

Therefore, while there is what is termed "academic freedom" and "freedom of inquiry," etc., there are also unspoken rules concerning not being so truthful as to bring down the very, supposed, support mechanism sustaining the Academy and the whole system. This same mentality necessarily permeates the rest of culture and society, as the people have been educated in it.

Here is the most important place to start when beginning to think about these things. Those with the most money have gone to {perhaps it was an ancestor(s)} the most effort, in general, by all means possible to obtain it and have done and will do, again in general, anything and everything conceivable to retain it. They were trained and they likewise train their offspring thusly.

The other place where this dismissive attitude is engendered is in the think tanks. Unlike the ivory towers, the think tanks dwell on these things. They are paid to dwell on them. They know that there is plenty of truth in them, and their job is to come up with counters other than aloofness. Afterall, not everyone in society brown noses the university elites — are mesmerized by them. So, the think-tank people paid by the richest of the rich (the plutocrats), come up with the counter-spin that is always against Jesus and God. They employ the dark art (actually very transparent when examined with an honest and brave heart) of false propaganda. The military and the so-called intelligence agencies use it too of course and largely for the same reason and definitely paid by the plutocrats again, who literally own and control both to the exclusion of the duped masses.

Now, what about the 13 bloodline families, the empire of the three (the Vatican, London, and Washington), and terms such as the Illuminati and the NWO and such? These are terms of reference. They are also used on both sides of the issues as code.

Why are these terms not even hot potatoes in the ivory towers? Why are they not thrown to someone else to handle but rather just dropped as being unworthy of discussion? What should we think and do?

Let me cut right through it. The subject of the control of money has been deliberately rendered inextricable (however it isn't, as I'm demonstrating here) from other evils such as the attempted genocide of European Jews, as the false-Zionists would have you swallow every last bit of that without any questions whatsoever, which is never the right thing to do. Extending unquestioning trust is something that must be reserved. It must be based upon the longest-term vision obtainable.

When I/NWO is put out there, the conditioned automatic, unthinking, reflex response is to assign "anti-Semite," "holocaust denier," "Marxist" or "Nazi," or some other smearing and deliberately ill-defined label. Let me make this perfectly clear. Considering the subject of the Illuminati, the New World Order, capitalism, banking, usury, money, mammon, holocaust substantiated and unsubstantiated facts, Jewishness, etc., does not, I repeat, does not automatically denote anti-Semitism (more specifically an anti-Jew stance).

I am not, repeat, not anti-Jew. It would be impossible for me to be anti-Jew since Jesus is a Jew, contrary to the notion put forth by some Nazis that Jesus was an Aryan. Besides, Abraham was from Ur in Mesopotamia. Furthermore, as I point out in this post, we are all brothers and sisters if we will but open up our hearts and minds to the true meaning of words and the whole implication of those meanings. The video touches on this.

So, in the ivory towers and elsewhere, any mention of the Illuminati is met with "anti-Semitism" as the countering, dismissing, thought. The thought is to be instantly terminated, because...?

...because the house will fall down and be replaced with a new house that might actually not be based upon coercive and deceptive dominance and being served by others while doing as little as possible for the good of those others.

Lets' cut right through it again. Is it possible to not be anti-Semitic (anti-Jew) while cutting through the deception of the system of mammon? Yes, it is absolutely possible. I know, because I'm right here doing it.

Are there anti-Semites who further the whole I/NWO message? Yes, there are many people who lump all Jews and others together as being groups worthy of extermination. They hold that the drive to the evil domination referred to above is an inexorable genetic trait that must be obliterated for the sake of the rest of humanity. They are wrong though for many reasons.

The 13 bloodlines are just nurtured as such. Furthermore, 13 is an arbitrary, catchy number since it is associated with superstition. That's not to say that numbers aren't language or that they have no meaning. Numbers are definitely a language and hold all the meaning letters hold. That's another discussion though.

The point about the 13 families is that the spirit of greed and selfishness and violence to obtain domination and self-licensing to do all manner of other wicked things is a spirit that is not confined to bloodlines. Likewise, the opposite spirit that is righteousness may cross, and does cross, genetic boundaries.

Of course there are 13 most-controlling families in the world. There are 2 most-controlling families in the world. There are 200. There is even the least controlling family in the world. These are moving designations. Yes, those at the so-called top of the pyramid have been fixed there longer and are more difficult to dislodge, but being dislodged happens from time to time by the competition from below within that whole unreality.

Understand that this whole superimposition of the I/NWO-language construct has been developed as competition. The interesting thing is that more-and-more, those furthering the description are being forced to face up to any and all hypocrisy in their own projections in order to reach the greatest numbers per chance of actually dislodging the whole coercive, pyramid scheme. You see, they need the authorization of God before they will be allowed to assume positions of tangible, material authority. It is true.

Right now, the anti-God spirit rules the Earth. God's will that will be done is that the selfish ones at the top of the illusory pyramid (false-hearted) be replaced not by more mammon worshippers but by the Godly. Many, even the vast, vast majority, of those who further the overthrow of the I/NWO system are themselves still mired in the thorn bushes of the system of mammon. They want the individual nation-states to coin their own money and not pay taxes to the private-central-bank owners as interest on money those owners create from the start and are thereby paid forever for doing nothing that the people couldn't have done for themselves, collectively, without owing any interest to anyone. Well, that's fine up to a point.

I have explained that the United States certainly could and should, as a step in the right direction (turning only but not to stay there at that low level of light), end the Federal Reserve System with the stroke of the pen and replace all Federal Reserve Notes with United States Notes (interest free). I have explained before that no nation-state needs to borrow at interest from anyone. All things can be pay-as-you go-simply (pay-go) by the people issuing their own currency by their public and not private government. This would result in zero inflation and zero deflation. It's just a choice of management.

If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury. (Exodus 22:25 KJVR)

Take thou no usury of him, or increase: but fear thy God; that thy brother may live with thee. (Leviticus 25:36 KJVR)

Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase. (Leviticus 25:37 KJVR)

Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury: (Deuteronomy 23:19 KJVR)

Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it. (Deuteronomy 23:20 KJVR)

Then I consulted with myself, and I rebuked the nobles, and the rulers, and said unto them, Ye exact usury, every one of his brother. And I set a great assembly against them. (Nehemiah 5:7 KJVR)

I likewise, and my brethren, and my servants, might exact of them money and corn: I pray you, let us leave off this usury. (Nehemiah 5:10 KJVR)

He that putteth not out his money to usury, nor taketh reward against the innocent. He that doeth these things shall never be moved. (Psalms 15:5 KJVR)

He that by usury and unjust gain increaseth his substance, he shall gather it for him that will pity the poor. (Proverbs 28:8 KJVR) [emphasis added]

And it shall be, as with the people, so with the priest; as with the servant, so with his master; as with the maid, so with her mistress; as with the buyer, so with the seller; as with the lender, so with the borrower; as with the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him. (Isaiah 24:2 KJVR)

Woe is me, my mother, that thou hast borne me a man of strife and a man of contention to the whole earth! I have neither lent on usury, nor men have lent to me on usury; yet every one of them doth curse me. (Jeremiah 15:10 KJVR)

He that hath not given forth upon usury, neither hath taken any increase, that hath withdrawn his hand from iniquity, hath executed true judgment between man and man, (Ezekiel 18:8 KJVR)

Hath given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase: shall he then live? he shall not live: he hath done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon him. (Ezekiel 18:13 KJVR)

That hath taken off his hand from the poor, that hath not received usury nor increase, hath executed my judgments, hath walked in my statutes; he shall not die for the iniquity of his father, he shall surely live. (Ezekiel 18:17 KJVR)

In thee have they taken gifts to shed blood; thou hast taken usury and increase, and thou hast greedily gained of thy neighbours by extortion, and hast forgotten me, saith the Lord GOD. (Ezekiel 22:12 KJVR)

Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury. (Matthew 25:27 KJVR)

There are several very important things to say about these things. First, there is what Jesus had to say about who is and who is not to be subjected to usury.

Before that, let me preface with the following:

He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me. (Luke 10:16 KJVR)

That applies to anyone repeating the words of Jesus in earnest and in full consistency and full context.

I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes: even so, Father; for so it seemed good in thy sight.

There he is talking against those at the top of the false-pyramid and their intellectuals.

And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour? And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee. Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves? And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise. (Luke 10:25-37 KJVR)

So, there you have the answer as to who is your neighbor and, frankly, your brother. Who was the brother to him? He that shewed mercy on him. Who can't see that? Jesus thereby exposed the hypocrisy in the Old Testament. That hypocrisy was lack of the greater vision that Jesus has and showed and still shows. Therefore, no one is to lend at usury to anyone else. This whole way of feeling, thinking, and being (acting) goes on and on. It goes on to the point where there is no money at all required of anyone.

Here we are though, in a system of mammon. Jesus paid for his meals with mammon donated to his cause. Look at who carried it for the group. It was Judas who betrayed Jesus. That's not to say that everyone is corruptible by paying for things with mammon in the sense that being subjected right now to it precludes rising above it. We must take the steps necessary to do that though — to rise above it. The Christian Commons Project is designed as the Isaiah-liberal/Christian device to do just that.

Before I leave off, let me specifically address Matthew 25:27, since it is woefully abused by the capitalists in a lower than feeble attempt to use Jesus to justify capitalism and banking and usury and such.

Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury. (Matthew 25:27 KJVR)

Now, first of all, Jesus hates hypocrisy. How could Jesus hold with being the Good Samaritan and with transcending even the Old Testament law against usury while simultaneously holding with usury? He can't. If the position of the capitalists concerning Matthew 25:27 were correct, Jesus would be the biggest hypocrite who ever walked the earth. His words wouldn't be of any authority for justifying anything. So, what then is he talking about? What does the verse in the parable mean?

"Money" in the verse is being used analogously, standing in for the gift of truth, love, and peace in heart, mind, and soul. It is standing in for the Holy Spirit that is light. Putting the money to the exchangers is shedding the light to the general population and those who will receive it and then, in turn, magnify it. The very "money" in the verse is the truth that money is not only not needed but rather a hindrance in the end.

For I tell you, that many prophets and kings have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them. (Luke 10:24 KJVR)

If this is all true, why doesn't the general population know it after nearly two thousand years? They have been to busy.

Oh, if I had a dollar for every time the excuse of being too busy has been offered up, I could already have translated the whole system of the unrighteous mammon into the New Heaven and the New Earth conflated.

And the cares of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, and the lusts of other things entering in, choke the word, and it becometh unfruitful. (Mark 4:19 KJVR)

Of course, who will trust others now? Look at all the "transparency" that is required of the churches on account of the waxing cold of hearts. When people donate to the Commons, many will automatically expect that, that money will be held at interest. Well, on account of the degree of darkness brought on by the current system, it is nigh to impossible to avoid that evil. The sooner the better it will be when we have placed ourselves in the position of being able to translate donations into the righteousness that is the Christian Commons: Land as the Church-Membership's Commons. We must work together to reach that threshold.

Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need. And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus, Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles' feet. (Acts 4:34-37 KJVR)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in United States Notes. Bookmark the permalink.