FALSE-ZIONIST PROJECT IS GOING TO PROTECT WAR CRIMINALS FROM PROSECUTION: NO THEY WON'T

So, the false-Zionist Project is going to protect war criminals from prosecution they say. No they won't. They did all sorts of things that clearly violated international law, just as Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld, et al., did all sorts of things that clearly violated both U.S. and international law.

The killing of innocents in Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan, and Pakistan continues with Barack Obama at the helm. It's official now. He's a war criminal. His hands are dripping in blood, just as the other Presidents before him who ordered killing without proof of the guilt of those killed by the military-service personnel and weapons used. Where was "beyond the shadow of a doubt"? Does he feel powerful now? Who authorized him to license others to kill and murder on his say-so alone? Was it God? It was not. It was God's nemesis. It was the one who rebels against God's rule.

Mark my words, the impunity of raw military power will be put down by righteousness.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • pick up lines guy

      Obama?
      What he did until now?
      I expected more of him... I guess i was wrong...

      • Hello Hank,

        What's your relationship with Brooke who left comments on GLOBAL WARMING STILL INCREASING: FOX NEWS LIES?

        What did you expect from Barack Obama?

        He's only in charge to the extent the plutocrats allow. If he tries to go too far in their minds, they'll destroy him. That's what happens when one is beholden to them: If one puts the flesh above the spirit that is God. Some things are worth being killed in the flesh so the soul will live the real life. All such things are righteous and of God.

        By the way, there are certain things that cross the line. Fornication is one of them. Don't promote it or do it. Do the opposite. Denounce it; and keep yourself within a monogamous, heterosexual marriage or abstain.

        Blessings to All,

        Tom Usher

    • pick up lines guy

      He's closing the Guantanamo and that's very good.
      I would expect him to start handling the situation between Gaza and Israel asap.
      Don't you think?

      Hank

      • Hello Hank,

        Welcome back.

        Hank, some websites are too risqué to be linked from comments on Christian websites. I realize that society is loaded with sexual temptation and to talk with others, a Christian must not be completely walled in or off until Heaven is in every heart.

        Jesus did and does go to the sinners of this world. What he doesn't do though is cross a line where he is promoting sleaze.

        I wish the world had never contained a slut. Sluttishness is now more mainstreamed than ever in America. You aren't here, but sluttishness is prevalent in Israel too, so I've read (not having ever visited there).

        Frankly, I'd like to change your commentator name here from "pick up lines guy" to Hank plus your last name. Perhaps you are open enough for that though. Let me know because I can do a global search-and-replace.

        As for Obama closing Guantanamo, according to the news, he's going to take about a year to do it. I think 2 weeks maximum would have been plenty of time. Furthermore, he's been wishy-washy about CIA so-called "safe houses." The CIA, and all institutions like it including the Mossad, needs to be disbanded as soon as possible. All the intelligence agencies and militaries of the world need to be disbanded. All the criminals need to convert. What the world needs is love, not violence and punishment and harm.

        As for Obama and Gaza and Israel, he's sent George Mitchell over there but Mitchell is refusing even to speak with Hamas, at least in the open. It's stupid, and won't work.

        The U.S. funded all the military hardware and ammunition and oil for the Zionist Project to kill innocent children. Both the U.S. and Israel are guilty of murdering the innocent. Hamas too is guilty, only less so (on a certain level).

        Obama has already murdered innocents in Pakistan.

        This is no way to go about running things. It's terrible mismanagement. It's rebellion against God. If the people don't stop doing all this evil, if they don't start bringing forth in a huge way and soon, it is going to become a much, much darker and harder world before World War III breaks out in our lifetimes.

        When I say bringing forth, I mean the Christian Commons.

        Barack Obama is not on track or pace properly to handle things. He's stymied by the richest of the rich (the superrich; the plutocrats) who make their mammon off death, destruction, artificially created scarcity, fear mongering, division, and all the rest of the evil.

        They worship Satan. Satan is their god — the god of this world right now until the people wake up.

        Does that answer your question?

        Blessings,

        Tom Usher

    • pick up lines guy

      Bay the way, about Brooke... she work associate.
      She's actually the one that showed me your site...
      Hank

      • I hope she returns and fills us in.