DOCUMENTING EINSATZGRUPPEN (NAZI MOBILE KILLING UNITS) IN UKRAINE

French, Roman Catholic Priest, Patrick Desbois, is traveling Ukraine interviewing eyewitnesses to Nazi killings of Jews mostly via bullets.

Some estimate that "By the spring of 1943, the Einsatzgruppen and Order Police battalions had killed over a million Jews." Einsatzgruppen is German for "Nazi mobile killing units." You might call them death squads. Rather than transporting Jews and others to camps, the Einsatzgruppen allegedly (proven if you believe the Ukrainians and Patrick Desbois, which I do) executed the people in and around the people's villages.

The work he is doing has a website called "Yahad in Unum."

He's authored a book on the subject too.

This is all a good beginning, but it's underwhelming. It's overwhelming that the Nazis executed anyone simply for being a non-German, but it's underwhelming the lack of governmental funding that has gone on all these decades.

Here we have many people throwing the term "holocaust denial" around, yet the actual mass graves of Jews and others have yet archeologically and forensically to be excavated. Also, here is a priest having to have people manually dig test holes in search of the mass graves when sophisticated technology exists that can scan the earth for where it has been dug up even after sixty or more years — even ever. Why is that technology not being used to mark the outline of every possible mass grave?

I for one want the hard evidence to put this whole "debate" to rest once and for all. I want to close the mouths of the racists and ethnic bigots who claim the Nazis hardly did anything wrong. Whether it's ten million Jews or one million Jews (most people say around 6 million Jews and 5 million others), I want the evidence out there so we will all know for sure the extent of the atrocities.

As a general rule, Yahad In Unum accepts the existence of an heretofore unknown place of execution only when at least three eyewitnesses can be identified who independently certify that they also saw the execution take place at that site.

... about 7,000 cartridges have been collected and registered.

Once the first bodies are encountered they are left in situ and not disturbed. The bodies are photographed as evidence and any bullets and other ballistic evidence retrieved from the site before the grave is covered up and camouflaged in order not to allow graverobbers [sic] to loot and desecrate it.

... magazines provide the identity proof that the perpetrators were indeed nazi [sic] mobile killing units and not Soviet forces.

(Source: yahadinunum.org)

Anyway, I wholeheartedly support this work but wish it were at least 100 times the effort and being done by the United Nations perhaps with German, Jewish, and other nationalities represented on every investigative team. It would be a great way to get to truth and reconciliation.

I want to add though that no matter how atrocious the Nazis were, it is not even the slightest excuse for what the so-called Zionist Project has done in Palestine anymore than the South African Afrikaners had any excuse for their Apartheid regime.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • First time I have ever heard about EINSATZGRUPPEN. I will check this out right now. I love history and there are two parts of history I love the most: Greek and Roman history.

      Nina

      • Hello Nina,

        Thanks for your comment. I had to rescue it from the anti-spam plugin.

        I hadn't read the term "Einsatzgruppen" often before.

        There have been a number of theories put forth. One is that the Nazis were becoming alarmed at the cost of using up so much ammunition in that way. It's one of the arguments used to answer why they shifted to gassing people. The holocaust revisionists/deniers (depending) say that the gassing didn't occur or if it did, certainly not on the scale alleged by the Jewish concentration-camp survivors.

        Here's how I see it. It is a huge mistake to make revision/denial illegal. The Europeans have made a big mistake with such censorship. The smart approach is to defeat arguments. If there is hard evidence that gassing was used, then put that right out front and center. If there isn't any such hard evidence, then admit it and let the chips fall where they may.

        Making revision illegal shows intellectual weakness. It plays right into the hands of those who want the world to think that the Nazis didn't do anything wrong.

        How many people died on account of the U.S. bombing, invasion, and occupation of Iraq? The official U.S. position doesn't really exist. They decided not to draw attention to it on account of the body-count problems during the Vietnam War. Anyway, the antiwar crowd estimates that 1,300,000 have died. Many people in the U.S. (warmongers) say that it's closer to 30 to 50,000. That's a huge difference.

        So, how many did the Nazis kill? The people (certain false-Zionists) who want to gain the most from the world thinking the number is high will say 6 million-plus Jews were killed. The former Nazis will say 30,000 to 300,000 maybe. It just depends upon the ideology.

        What we need are the hardest facts that can be come by. On both sides, the extremists don't want that to happen. They don't really believe the numbers they've pushed will really stand up to such scrutiny. Truth is sacrificed.

        If 6 million Jews and 5 million others were exterminated, I want the hardest evidence possible right out front showing that. I want that evidence to have withstood scrutiny.

        What's wrong with that? Nothing is wrong with it. It's a great idea. Do you (any reader) agree? If not, why not?

        Peace,

        Tom

    • Well I must say that I agree with you. With out hard evidence people can just guess. That number of killed Jews In the WWII is so big because the history was written by winners. So if Germans won that war I can agree with you about that that number would be much less. Maybe not even 1 million total, the Jews and other ones. Maybe even less. It is true that they found corpses but when they count them they can't say that number of them is more then , I guess, 100.000. And I must I agree with you that the number of killed in Iraqi was bigger then 100.000 but I really didn't know that it is more then 1 million.

      Cheers

      Nina

      • Hi Nina,

        ...history was written by winners. So if Germans won that war I can agree with you about that that number would be much less. Maybe not even 1 million total, the Jews and other ones. Maybe even less.

        If the Nazis had won, the Jews would have all been exterminated everywhere as much as possible. No doubt, the Nazis would have had DNA testing and would then have used it to wipe out traces. Then what would they have written in their history books? They would have started by writing more things reinforcing all the vile distortions they were writing before and during WWII.

        Yes, there were evil Jews. There are evil members of every ethnic group once the group becomes big enough or if one uses an extremely strict and high standard concerning the difference between right and wrong or good and evil. However, the Nazis were flat wrong that all Jews were this, that, or the other, other than being descendents of Jacob. There are plenty of decent Jews by even righteous standards meant by Jesus. There are Jews who are trying to be Christlike to the extent this dark, dark world allows Jesus's light to shine forth.

        Perhaps the Nazis would have bragged about how many "evil" ones they wiped out. Perhaps they would have finally made even speaking or writing the word "Jew" illegal — wiping them from the pages of history. How can we know what that universe would have done? God alone knows such things. Even the Son of man in Heaven doesn't know such unless God reveals it.

        As for the Iraq War and the violent deaths caused by the U.S. invasion and occupation, see the following: justforeignpolicy.org.

        Here's an update from The Nation magazine.

        Blessings to you,

        Tom