TVCC AND WTC7 FIRES: WAKE UP TO REALITY (TRUTH) OR ELSE

See: "Beijing's newest skyscraper survives blaze," by Jonathan Glancey. The Guardian. February 11, 2009.

Mandarin Oriental hotel, Beijing, China (522ft, 40-stories), aka: Television Cultural Centre (TVCC)

World Trade Center building number 7 (WTC7)

Beijing skyscraper totally engulfed in flames

WTC 7

Beijing

WTC 7 before total collapse (that took approximately 7 seconds — hardly a flame in the relative sense)

Those images are over on . If they don't want me hotlinking to them (I think being 9-11 Truthers they won't mind a bit) or if they are copyright protected such that I shouldn't have them up here, I'll load them on the RLCC server or remove them as the case may be.

In case you're wondering, the Chinese government has said that fireworks started the fire.

TVCC Withstood the Huge and Very Hot Flames: No Collapse/Controlled Demolition

The thing is that the steel frame of the TVCC withstood the huge and very hot flames. It remained standing. There were differences in the construction between TVCC and World Trade Center building number 7 (WTC7) but not enough to merit summarily dismissing the 9-11 Truth Movement concerning the parallels.

Silence is Damnable

WTC7 came down with the U.S. government claiming that fires on 8 floors caused the collapse due to heat and some minor damage. Also, there have been other steel buildings engulfed in flames. Not one has ever collapsed. When one knows

  • a), as we do, that the New York police department was informed before hand that WTC7 was going to collapse and to evacuate people from the area and when we have
  • b) testimony of people who were inside WTC7 who experienced firsthand the explosions in the building and were stepping over dead bodies and when we see
  • c) how WTC7 came down exactly, I repeat, exactly, as controlled demolitions and when we consider
  • d) the enormity of the historical evils of empires and all the false-flag operations both planned and carried out, including by the United States government within our lifetimes,

one can't rightly argue against the truth that the silence is deafening: "Beijing Skyscraper Fire: The Silence Is Deafening," by Paul Joseph Watson. Prison Planet.com. February 12, 2009.

Understand here too that the U.S. governments theory is based upon research and data that has not been peer reviewed.

If you do a Google news search on this, you will be amazed at how few sites even hint at it. It's planned to be a memory-hole event.

No Libertarian Capitalist; No Global-Warming-Denier Duped/Shill

I don't agree with every last one of Alex Jones's positions. I'm not a libertarian capitalist. I definitely don't subscribe to the idea that the climate is not being impacted by human carbon burning in a huge and negative manner. That's what the mega-oil corporations and coal corporations want you to believe while they devastate the planet and make the lives of so many miserable while claiming they are bringing wealth and prosperity to the masses that could not otherwise be brought forth: Nonsense.

The oil and coal billionaires and the bankers who fund them are duping the lowly libertarians by funding their think tanks, etc. How they don't see the connection between Exxon and the bankers and the dark side New World Order is just as revealing about the hypnosis as is the blindness and deafness concerning 9-11. The libertarian masses need to wake up to the reality of Jesus Christ. They are dreaming if they think guns and ammo and stocking up on canned goods and buying gold is the path to the New Heaven and New Earth and real New World Order not of the dark but of the light to come.

Hypnosis, Intimidation, and Control

The silence concerning even questioning the U.S. position that fire and damage not caused by deliberately placed explosives and steel-cutting chemicals brought down WTC7 in the face of the TVCC fire in China is evidence of broad hypnosis, intimidation, and control. The mainstream media hasn't touched the subject other than to say in a few isolated instances things suggesting that Jones and everyone who even entertains the remotest possibility that 9-11 was an inside job is a kook.

Well, we have the polling that the majority of New Yorkers believe the government did a cover-up.

Jesus Taught Openly

Even while the people know they are being manipulated with thought-termination techniques, they stand as silent, dumbfounded sheep. At least they could be as Jesus and state openly that the U.S. government belongs to the plutocrats and that American democracy is a total farce cobbling together via the U.S. Constitution wholly irreconcilable spirits. The elitists came up with that Constitution. That Constitution is not Christian even slightly.

Jesus stated openly via parables that the Israeli government belonged to the evil Roman Empire and Caesar, the fallen demigod, and that the Sanhedrin was a total farce. He did it via parables so they couldn't accuse him of whatever. Even Pontius Pilate, who allegedly sacrificed Jews, couldn't find any fault in him. After all, if the shoe fits. The powers that be recognized themselves as the evil ones in the parables. They also knew full well (as Jesus intended) that were the people to abide by Jesus's teachings, those powers would fall, which they did (of their own dead, spiritual weight too).

Only the Plutocrats Chose Obama

You don't really think that the common people as the mass of voters chose Barack Obama during the primaries do you? The large media corporations, which all belong to the plutocrats, chose him. The top bankers who control the global currency (it's really one currency in the end) chose him. Obama wasn't auditioning for you. He was auditioning for the plutocrats. So was John McCain. They all were in one sense or another. That's inherent within that system. Jesus didn't do that. They were never going to choose Jesus. He knew that. They couldn't choose him and follow his lead and remain in power. They could and did choose Barack Obama and can follow his so-called lead and stay in power. That's because Obama is not the power. The power behind him to which he turns his back on the people and bows is the dark power.

Peace Alone; Giving and Sharing Alone; Purity of Heart and Deeds Alone

You've perhaps heard of the five solas of the Protestants. Well let's cut through the obfuscation. The world is not going to get truly better until the plutocracy is ended by peaceful means alone. The world will never be saved until the people choose as the economic model alone giving and sharing all and with all as the lowliest serving all. The world will never be saved until the people check all their lusts and do righteousness alone.

The Government Lies

  • WTC7 did not come down on account of the reasons given to the public by the U.S. government. The government lied.
  • The North Vietnamese did not start the Vietnam War with the U.S. by attacking a U.S. warship. The government lied.
  • The Spanish did not sink the U.S.S. Maine in Cuba. The government lied.
  • The Japanese were goaded into war and the U.S. knew about the attack before it happened. The government lied.
  • The Mexicans did not cross into U.S territory and kill American troops. The government lied.

The list goes on and on. It's all documented. The government lies and lies and lies and lies.

The U.S. is an Empire. It acts imperially. It uses all the proverbial Satanic tricks it can dig up from the history of former empires. It is suffering the same fate too for the same reasons.

State Secrets be Damned

9-11 needs a complete airing come what may. State secrets be damned. The real security of the nation and the whole world depends upon coming clean. Repentance is the one and only path. Anything else leads to more and more destruction and pain and suffering for each soul that goes down any other route.

Synagogue of Satan

Remember, it was Dick Cheney who openly advocated that the people of the U.S. turn to the dark side. That's evil. The dark side is evil. Cheney advocates that the people become evil. That's Satanic, plain and simple. How can you believe him or trust him in anything? How could the American people choose a President who chose as his running mate someone who openly advocated that America admit that it is the Synagogue of Satan and then the rest of the nation not do a thing about it, such as impeachment or anything, not even formal denunciation of the utter lack of principles?

Jesus Was Not a Paranoid Schizophrenic

Look, this is no trifling matter. This is not something to be dismissed as a paranoid delusion. Jesus was not a paranoid schizophrenic. They did crucify him for openly preaching the truth that is the right path. Wake up to reality or else.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.