LAND TITLE IS RIGHTFULLY THE CHURCH'S (ALL GOD'S CHILDREN, ALL HUMAN BEINGS), NOT THE PLUTOCRATS'

Update 1: Saturday, March 14, 2009:

The following is an email reply of mine:

Hi [I don't know whether the person would be concerned about the name being associated here, so I've left it out],

A search on the RLCC website will show that I've written about Battalion 3-16 and the KUBARK manual, etc. The concepts about which you've written to me were all familiar to me. I was aware of the "primitiveness" of much of Mexico.

I understand your reaction to my statement concerning the RC's. I do realize that they are elitists. They always have been. That church is fully a part of the empire (Beast of the Bible). There are anti-Beast Roman Catholics (non-violent liberation theologians), but they don't understand that they are RC's in name only and should renounce their affiliation and follow Jesus and not their Pope.

Let me say further, not that you are necessarily unaware but rather that it bears stating (much as why you sent me what you did), that the plutocrats have no intention of leaving any people on Earth unmolested. Their intention is to "civilize" all and where "civilize" to the plutocrats means "enslave." They intend that all the Earth be held under "legal" titles where there will be zero Commons. There are to be no "unbanked."

They will force this via technology against which no one is to be able to defend in anyway. In other words, they intend to bring Hell in full. Only the metaphysical will save.

Your emails to me and mine to you are not private. Communications have not been private for decades – long before 9-11.

I have had a dossier on me since the late 1960's. My family was "radical." I was the most "radical" (extreme idealist) of my family (albeit not a professing Christian for having not yet cross-referenced scripture). "Radical" there is as was defined at the time by the fascist/sociopath, J. Edgar Hoover, far, far from the only one, as you no doubt appreciate.

To summate your article, it's about the U.S. as a mixed state with heavy fascist tendencies that use simplistic sound bites in conjunction with so many other lifelong conditioning methods to convince American public opinion. That said, Marxism, and more importantly to Mexico, Trotskyism were and are evil realities too.

The idea is money. The United Fruit Company figured and still figures prominently under other names. The Dulles brothers (Yalies) and the CIA simply worked for a wing of the plutocrats. The impetus for many of the Whites who first set foot on these continents was Empire. The Monroe Doctrine was simply to say "ours" versus Europe's. The Bush administrations went into Iraq both times in the power struggle between groups of families (Biblically nations).

The reason the U.S. doesn't pursue alternative energy for instance is not so much because Exxon is heavily invested in oil but more because the U.S. seeks to deny China and India, etc. If the U.S. turns to alternatives, as it could very easily, and moves out of the Middle East, China and India and others move in and use the oil anyway to fuel their budding military empires. That's the fear-propaganda internal to second-tier plutocrats.

Most importantly, the plutocrats believe that the people belong to them, the plutocrats, by virtue of the fact that those plutocrats have the temerity to create it in fact, to manifest it, to force it. They are demon possessed, plain and simple.

As for "rent," I'm not interested in putting the Christian Commons into that position. While there is no such thing as a real allodial title save in the New Heaven, that's the direction I'm heading. The Church is its members. Those members will own all together and equally everything the Church owns. If you can create that in Mexico, tell me how. I don't want to bring forth less.

When I was researching existing situations and possibilities, I did look at ejidos. I didn't see them as conducive enough.

The title must be the Church's. Can that be done? If so, tell me how and short of violent revolution, which violence I stand against.

Blessings To All There,

Tom Usher

Update 1: Saturday, March 14, 2009:

I want to qualify the position concerning renting property. The RLCC will rent temporarily. What we want to avoid is renting permanently. We want to avoid getting locked into a situation where the Church would have built up something only to be placed under economic duress greater than is the common place anyway. The Church can only come to own ejido land in Mexico if the people who own that land become the Church. Yes?

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • May God continue to bless you as you continue to provide quality and informative substance to your posts. God Bless - Rev. Jim Wilson

      • Hi Jim,

        Thank you for the open prayer and blessing for the RLCC and CCP.

        I just visited your site. The post where you ask, "if I sucked the brain out of your head and then told you to build what we have just talked about," concerning a literally brainless being building or creating a human baby from scratch (but where did the scratch come from even?) was an interesting take on the subject. It reminds me of the concept that given eternity and all things then necessarily happening and even having had already happened, sooner or later or is it that already or perhaps constantly, a chimpanzee will type a Shakespearian play. Well, the answers to that are, not necessarily and so what anyway? In fact, if that concept is right, every chimp is doing it right now. Only, that's not the case on this plane of existence. We don't see that happening.

        No, given eternity, stuff just doesn't happen to result in us and in everything else that the scientists "see." As for which came first God or nothing and is that therefore God, and thoughts such as those, they are nonstarters. Eternal memory doesn't remember the beginning that wasn't. We get so hung up on semantical ignorance that we don't get going with what we do know and that's to bring forth. Let's bring forth. It's what God wants.

        How do I know? I am that I am. I am what I am. I know it because tautological things are truth. There is no false paradox there.

        People are so arrogant insisting that we must remain stupid. Jesus isn't stupid. We should all be so stupid!

        Blessing to you too, Jim.

        Stay in touch.

        Tom

    • Hi Tom--

      I was born, raised, and educated (except for college) Roman Catholic. I don't think it's just that they don't understand they're RC in name only. It is fear of what will happen to them if they admit it.

      I, myself, was in my late 20s before the Holy Ghost removed the scales from my eyes. RCs are taught from the cradle that Catholic=Good and Protestant=Bad. We were taught that entering a non-Catholic Church was a sin. Although this is not solid doctrine, it is still inferred to this day. RCs are indoctrinated to believe that if they leave the Church for another, they are bound for perdition. They pride themselves as the One TRUE Church. This is a psychological and emotional lock on their very souls. The hierchy would rather have you stop attending church all together, than see you attending one outside the RCs control. It is shameless and very unscriptural. It is no easy task. One must have the help of the Holy Ghost.

      Revelation 18 is quite clear, with vs 4 saying, "Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins..."

      You have to be extremely tautological, especially when it comes to dealing with members of the RC, or you will never get through to many. Jesus was the Master of Tautology.

      Peace and Grace

      • Hi Tim,

        Thanks for returning. I had a rather lengthy back-and-forth (I won't call it a debate because the other party never rose to the occasion) with a Roman Catholic by the name of Kevin. It began somewhat on someone else's site, but picked up on this site on this post in the comment section and in a number of other posts and comments. Kevin promised to refute all my points in a new blog he said he'd create just for that purpose. He never did that to my knowledge. He never returned to say he had created the new blog with the refutations.

        I'd write more and visit your site to leave a comment or two now, but I'm facing some deadlines. Thanks for understanding.

        God Bless,

        Tom