SINGLE-PAYER AND OTHER CENSORED IDEAS

Obama won't talk about single-payer health insurance. He won't talk about doing away with the Federal Reserve System either. He can't. The plutocrats won't let him.

He can't talk about the inherent conflict between democracy and capitalism. Democracy is the next biggest enemy of capitalism — next to Christianity. Christianity and then democracy are much bigger enemies of capitalism than was coercive socialism in the form of Marxism.

Could Obama "betray" the plutocrats rather than the people? Not and live he couldn't.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • Finaly! Someone telling the TRUTH and not afraid to tell it about this no good Obama. I don't like him. Imm not even old enough to vote yet and glad Im not for this election. Keep up the Good Work.

      God Bless

      alyssa jaide bragg

      • Hello Alyssa Jaide Bragg,

        While I know I'm not misleading you or anyone, I believe it is important that teens discuss things with their parents or adult guardians, etc., (as calmly and as thoroughly as reasonably possible). You may already be doing that. I suspect you are.

        The reason I say this to you here and now is because the concepts raised in my post above are Earth shaking so to speak. They are radical, revolutionary (albeit not violently so). They are very uncommon so far.

        I'm concerned that because they are not the usual topics understood by teens that you might fall into judging Obama based upon things you might not understand or you might chime in rather automatically with others who don't like Barack Obama's actions but for the wrong reasons, such as because they are simply racist or ethnically bigoted at heart, which Jesus was and is not. We want to avoid inadvertently facilitating that which is antichrist. At the same time, we must project Christlikeness into the worldly world. This can require us to qualify our statements and to elaborate to be clear.

          antichrist

          bad

          betray

          bless

          brother

          capitalism

          Christlikeness

          coercive socialism

          democracy

          enemy

          ethnically bigoted

          expose

          family

          God

          good

          heart

          hypocrisy

          inconsistencies

          inherent conflict

          judging

          light

          live

          love

          Marxism

          peace

          racist

          radical

          revolutionary

          single-payer health insurance

          spiritual

          temporal

          Federal Reserve System

          the people

          plutocrats

          truth

          violently

          word

          worldly world

          worldview

          worthy

          Those are terms to which very few teens have been exposed in their fullest contexts.

          As for Obama and as Christians, we are to want him to turn away from hypocrisy. Turning from hypocrisy is easier said than done. It's not difficult to begin to do it, for we may easily stop what appears to be the most obvious of our hypocritical feelings, thoughts, words, and deeds. It begins to become more and more difficult truly to know what is or is not hypocritical the more we work to sort out the good from the bad and decide what to do with the bad. We are faced with the task of defining the term "bad" and all the other terms: The word.

          Jesus faced people with bad intentions who attempted publicly to trap him to expose inconsistencies in his world and spiritual view. They never succeeded in that. They've been trying ever since though.

          In the end, the word is "love," and "love" is defined by Jesus willingly going to the cross for the sake of others even much less worthy and as an example to all.

          Peace, love, truth, and many other terms finally mean the same thing. They are each the very spirit that is God.

          I hope you will continue expanding your mind, heart, and very soul so you will be a bright light to the world.

          Bless you, Alyssa, and your whole family.

          Love, Your Brother (old enough to be your temporal grandfather, but your eternal brother nevertheless if we are each worthy),

          Tom