Recently, the FBI claims to have arrested a group of four men in the Bronx, New York who were planning to blow up a synagogue and shoot down a U.S. military cargo plane.
FBI Agent Provocateur
Why is it legal for the FBI to infiltrate a group using criminals the FBI literally buys (in this case, the agent provocateur being one Shahed "Malik" Hussain) and then incite the group and also supply them with dangerous, lethal technology (fake or not) to carry out an FBI-planted criminal idea? This is incitement, enticement, entrapment, and probably a host of other immoral acts on the part of the FBI that if done by non-members of so-called law-enforcement, would land them in prison.
The FBI gave them lots of money, fake c-4 plastic explosives, and a fake Stinger missile that was supposedly to be used to shoot down an airplane. The FBI pretended to be Pakistani al Qaeda. The FBI was apparently the only outside "terrorist" group these four encountered. Also, the four were totally incapable of pulling off such an attack without the FBI. In other words, the FBI made them into what the FBI then claimed to have thwarted. I find this behavior by the federal government and the Obama administration reprehensible. It is not the job of law-enforcement to create temptations for people to fall to evil, but that is exactly what happened.
The Right Way to Handle "Terrorists"
If someone says, "I hate those motherf——-s, those f—-ing Jewish bastards.... I would like to get a synagogue," the job of others is to work with the person to change his or her mind. James Cromitie is alleged to have said this to a law-enforcement person. James is also alleged to have been a jailhouse convert to Islam. Well, if someone has been in jail and converted to Islam, he was not always an adherent to Mohammed's teachings and may very well have been fed a pack of lies concerning those teachings. James and the others should have been given other things about which to think.
Now, James was angry about what has been happening in Afghanistan, and that proves that U.S. and Obama policies and actions toward Afghanistan fuel anger. James is half Black. He may very well be, and likely is, a descendent of slaves on his Black mother's side. His father is an Afghani. His view of the White man's twisted view of himself (Whites) and history slants James' own worldview making him ripe for Mohammed's call to violence to defend Mohammed's version of God, who is not the God of Jesus, else Mohammed would have been a total pacifist as is Jesus.
This is far from the first time the FBI has used these evil tactics causing people to fall. Furthermore, the FBI could do this to anyone who ever voices a violent thought concerning others.
FBI Special Agent Robert Fuller: Rogue
FBI Special Agent Robert Fuller was the lead FBI agent who caused the illegal, immoral, and reprehensible extraordinary rendition of Canadian, Maher Arar. Maher was taken to Syria from the U.S. In Syria, he was severely abused: Tortured for nothing. He was totally innocent. Robert Fuller had all of this done to Maher based upon the testimony of another detainee (only 14 years old at the time?) who had likewise been subjected to abuse and said he would say anything to stop the abuse/torture: "to get better treatment." Why is Robert Fuller still on the loose with FBI authority? He's a proven liar as well. Concerning 2 pre-9-11 suspects (supposed), Fuller claimed he consulted ChoicePoint database on 9-4 or 9-5-2001. It was later shown that that was a lie. It came out via the 9/11 Commission that the FBI had not consulted ChoicePoint until after the events of 9-11. Do you trust this FBI operation against the four in New York? With clear cause outlined here, I do not.
I don't trust it anymore than I trust its Anthrax-Attack investigation result where they were ordered to pin it on (frame) Bruce Ivins. (BRUCE IVINS: LONE FALSE-FLAG PERPETRATOR, FRAMED BY FBI AS CONTINUING COVER-UP, OR SOMETHING ELSE?http://www.realliberalchristianchurch.org/2008/08/08/bruce-ivins-lone-false-flag-perpetrator-framed-by-fbi-as-continuing-cover-up-or-something-else.html)
It is important to note that the Federal Government (Obama administration), FBI was in control the whole time. They controlled the timing of this. Nothing could have happened when it did without the FBI supplying the fake materials. Why did they do it right now? Well, anyone who doesn't know that there are people sitting around on the federal payroll with nothing better to do but to time events for maximum propaganda effect isn't thinking. The emphasis in the mainstream news reports on "homegrown terrorism" is telling. When the fake right is in, it looks for leftist extremists and radicals. When the left is in, it looks for rightist extremists and radicals. Right now, the fake left is in now (very fake) and is busy targeting (even creating) right-wing violent revolutionaries. It is targeting American libertarians, many of whom are very much in line with the political philosophy and ideology of those who are called the Founding Fathers.
I don't say this to laud those founders, as I don't agree with them. They weren't real Christians. Most were deists at best. They were certainly elitists and mini-empire builders. Some had their eyes on national empire. Benjamin Franklin is a case in point. He knew the U.S. would become a huge empire and saw nothing wrong in it.
History of Imperialism
Now, this incident with the four in New York raises every question concerning governmental policy and real history. If the U.S. were not a predatory imperial power, would the situation ever have arisen? The answer is no. Of course, there are those who will rush in claiming that in a vacuum of military power, the U.S. would be enslaved by evil maniacal forces. That though presupposes that the forces of truth that is the light of which Jesus speaks could not alter the trajectory of everything and everyone.
Naysayers Against the Narrow Way are Wrong
The problem with the naysayers is that theirs is a self-fulfilling prophecy. If they say they can't adhere to Christianity because others won't (it isn't in their natures or human nature), then they are those others they are complaining about. It's that simple. If everyone turns to the real message of Jesus, then the troubles are over so long as each doesn't cave back in at the first slipup by anyone else. That's been the biggest problem of all. As Jesus said as follows:
Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended. (Matthew 13:21 KJV)
I will add that this applies where any troubles arise. People will turn away on account of it. They go in with the false idea that everything will be turned into Heaven instantly. That's not how it works until everyone converts and doesn't backslide. Then it will be Heaven bound forever getting better and better in the big picture despite anything that may come from the outside.
U.S. Senator Charles Schumer, Repent
Now we have U.S. Senator Charles Schumer "Chuck Schumer" (D-N.Y.) saying:
If there can be any good news from this terror scare it's that this group was relatively unsophisticated, penetrated early, and not connected to another terrorist group. This incident shows that we must always be vigilant against terrorism, foreign or domestic.
However, we have the Lord Jesus Christ teaching against Charles Schumer as follows:
But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; (Matthew 5:44 KJV)
So, Chuck, did you show love to James Cromitie and his group? Are you a blessing to them? Are you doing good to them? Did you pray for them? If you think I don't do these things toward you, you are wrong. I am speaking truth here to you and to others in the exact spirit of love Jesus means. His words are a blessing to humanity. Why do you reject him, Charles Schumer?
Historical Empire Spirit
The first White people to land on American shores were probably the Vikings. Their footholds didn't last. Then others came from later European powers. Spain and England have had the largest impact but many nations have been in this hemisphere for better and worse. Tens of millions of indigenous peoples were slaughtered for wealth and living space for the Europeans.
Many Whites abhorred it but were suppressed themselves. Let us not forget that the strongest abolitionists were White Christians of the less-mainstream varieties.
Current and Same Empire Spirit
Why is the U.S. in Afghanistan and Pakistan making violence? Is it for the public reasons given by Barack Obama, or is it for greedy reasons. I say it is for greedy reasons. It's not for righteousness' sake.
We have Dick Cheney and Barack Obama supposedly debating each other over the euphemism, "enhanced interrogation techniques." Both claim to be followers of Jesus. Neither of them is following:
But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 5:39;19 KJV)
Who's right here? Are Cheney and Obama right, or is Jesus right? Jesus is right. It's obvious. So, why is Obama the leader? Why have the American people chosen such a bad example to lead? What is wrong with them? Why is Obama backtracking on all the impressions he gave to the gullible and naive youth? He misled them. He knew he was doing that.
Convert to Stay
Why don't Charles Schumer and U.S. Representative Pete King (R-L.I.) and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg love Jesus's words and adhere to them to the best of their abilities?
Well, Jesus returned to Nazareth, his hometown. He taught in the synagogue simply by reading from Isaiah that he, Jesus, was the Messiah. He then went on to explain that the Jews of his hometown are as the Jews of old whom the earlier prophets couldn't reach. He reminded them that Elijah saved a widow of Zarephath near Sidon while all the Jewish widows suffered. The widow he saved was not Jewish. He also reminded them that Elisha healed only Naaman, a Syrian and non-Jew, of leprosy while many Jews suffered from leprosy. What is most interesting though is the reaction of the Jews of Nazareth upon hearing the reminders. They literally dragged Jesus to the edge of the town's cliff threatening to throw him off to death.
It needs to be understood that the prophets didn't fail to heal their own because those prophets were wicked. They failed to do it, to be given to do it, to be sent to do it, because of the hearts of those they failed to heal or who themselves failed to be softhearted enough to be healed.
Dick Cheney, Barack Obama, Charles Schumer, Pete King, Michael Bloomberg, and indeed, nearly every American, is likewise failing. They are rather subscribers to the spirit that dragged Jesus to the cliffs edge and finally crucified him on the torture device that was the cross.
Pray for James Cromitie, David Williams, Onta Williams, and Leguerre Payen and also Dick Cheney, Barack Obama, Charles Schumer, Pete King, and Michael Bloomberg and everyone. Bless all with the light that is the truth. Then all might be/will be healed. We all might/will be better healed.
Dick Cheney called the message of Jesus Christ, "recklessness cloaked in righteousness." Barack Obama is self-authorizing against God's law. He's advocating keeping people he can't prove have done wrong in prison for life just because some selfish, hardhearted souls want to use fear for private gain in deceitful riches.
That's the truth.
(Source: "FBI arrest four in alleged plot to bomb Bronx synagogues, shoot down plane," by Michael Daly, Alison Gendar, and Helen Kennedy. DAILY NEWS. May 21, 2009.)
(Source: "FBI Agent on Synagogue Case Has Questionable Record," by Graham Rayman. The Village Voice. May 21, 2009.)
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)