American media rarely attempts to give Americans a view of what things look like from within North Korea looking out. There's no doubt that North Korea's leader is modeled greatly upon the old uppercase Communist Party Cult of Personality Dictators, such as Mao and Stalin. However, there is also no doubt that Americans are lead away from considering all the reasons why the various other peoples of the world view and act toward America as they do.

I'm not going to attempt to give a world history/politics lesson here. I will say though that there are reasons people view predatory capitalism as evil regardless of whether or not the system those people have in mind to replace that predatory, crony capitalism (hybrid) is itself good.

America has been about militarily forcing open markets ostensibly for trading but in reality for negatively exploiting.

Now, North Korea in the most simplistic of terms, hears and sees American going into country after country directly and by proxy (puppets) dictating to those other nation-states what they will or won't do and taking the natural resources of those states regardless of the needs and wants of the local inhabitants many of whom are indigenous. North Korea is out of America's sphere of control, and that's something the predatory, violent, mammon worshippers are determined to change.

In order to make it all palatable for Americans, the mass media conceals Americas insatiable greed behind banalities such as "democracy," "freedom," "open markets," "human rights," "equal rights," and many others. Lately, of course, the U.S. has looked much more hypocritical than it used to when using terms such as "human rights." The evils of American torture has been on display for the whole world to see. America has been thusly and rightly shamed. Lately also, the expression "the rule of law" has been tossed about in America. It's a joke in most of the world. They know that the U.S. says one thing and does another. They know that the U.S. insists upon those laws that benefit imperial ambitions while totally ignoring those that don't. Consequently, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney and their whole torture-regime group have thus far received a pass from the "rule of law."

Now, mostly, the North Koreans see the U.S. has a huge threat in all aspects. North Korea has been insular for, among other reasons, huge fears of American imperialism. In addition, the U.S. economic and military Empire has forced restrictions upon North Korea rendering it insulated whether it wants that or not.

So, North Korea was added to the list of the Axis of Evil nations and the other nations on that list have either been attacked, have capitulated, or been further marginalized and threatened. Aside from being named, North Korea has seen what has happened to Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Lebanon, Gaza, Pakistan, and the threats against Iran and others. They saw the U.S. probing Russia via Georgia so the U.S. could study Russia's response to weigh Russia's military strength. They see the U.S. doing the same to the Chinese in naval confrontations. They hear the U.S. encouraging Japan to rearm (Heaven forbid). They hear the U.S. calling for NATO to beef up versus an EU army. They also see what's been going on vis-a-vis India that the U.S. is trying to turn into a full-blown military ally. They see the CIA's hand in attacks all over the globe, many of which are labeled "terrorist attacks."

They also see the economic signs of banking and currency consolidation ultimately remaining under U.S. domination in name only and for the sake of the centralization of the plutocracy. Democracy is a farce. The elections are rigged. The candidates are chosen by the plutocrats and sold to the people via the plutocrat owned and control mass mainstream media.

From the inside out, the U.S. is a huge, dangerous, cunning beast of prey and the only states it seems to steer more clear of when it comes to direct attacks are those that are nuclear armed and make it clear they will use such weapons against the U.S. if the U.S. attacks them. To North Korea then, nuclear weapons and the missiles to carry them are forms of insurance against a U.S. attack.

Look, you can be a predator or prey. That's the attitude of the so-called realists. Otherwise, you can show all that we don't need to be either.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.