DESTROY THEIR HOLY SITES. KILL (ARAB) MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, WROTE JEWISH RABBI MANIS FRIEDMAN OF THE CHABAD-LUBAVITCH MOVEMENT

DESTROY THEIR HOLY SITES. KILL (ARAB) MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, WROTE JEWISH RABBI MANIS FRIEDMAN OF THE CHABAD-LUBAVITCH MOVEMENT

"Rabbi's published comments about Arabs stir outrage,"http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/43611 by Jeff Strickler. Minneapolis Star Tribune. ScrippsNews. June 4, 2009.

A St. Paul, Minn., rabbi ignited a tidal wave of protest when he was quoted in a Jewish magazine as advocating the killing of Arabs.

"Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children," wrote Rabbi Manis Friedman of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. "With their holy sites destroyed, they will stop believing that God is on their side."

Violent, murderous, ethnic bigot

This rabbi is criminally insane.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • Cade Bryant

      Any "religion" that spews hatred and advocates violence is not from God.

      • Hi Cade,

        Welcome.

        We are to hate his evil. I spew hatred of his evil. That hatred of mine comes out from God. I know you get that. I know you get the different contexts and connotations at work. I also love Manis Friedman at the same time on a different level. He doesn't get that.

        Violence is evil. It is antichrist.

        Peace, brother,

        Tom

    • Thomas James

      I find it troubling that Rabbi's who seem to have control over the IDF love to quote the Old Testament which calls soldiers to show no mercy to the enemy but rather to kill every man, woman, child and infant. The Christian Right has also called for more crimes to be punished under the death penalty such as being a drug addict.

      The only thing that comes to my mind was when the Sanhedrin brought to Jesus a woman caught in the act of adultery and insisted that the law of Moses demands the death penalty. Then Jesus replied that who is without sin may cast the first stone.

      • Hey Thomas,

        Put http://www.realliberalchristianchurch.org/members... in the URL box. Your cookie dropped it. You may have commented on some other WordPress site and didn't want to link to your RLCC profile page for some reason. Thanks, brother.

        I tie this rabbi to the twisting of the concept of "violent extremists," which concept the woefully immature and wrongheaded speech writers for likewise immature, neocon/Zionist Obama love to twist and then throw at others. This rabbi is violent. Genocide is extreme — extremely evil. It's dark side all the way. God is not the destroyer of worlds. Satan is. God saves. Satan does the opposite. Being saved by Satan is being fooled. The end with Satan is Hell. To save one's flesh using evil is to lose one's soul to damnation where the last penny must be paid to Satan before deliverance.

        However because this rabbi is on Obama's side {not our father's (the LORD; YHVH), not Jesus's, not yours, and not mine}, he's not seen as a threat to U.S. national security. That of course, is shortsighted in the extreme.

        World peace and harmony is in the interest of everyone's real safety and security. The immature ones are twisting the concept of security, as they twist everything because they don't have the law of the Lord written on their hearts. They have the law of Satan written there instead. Following them is to be headed in the wrong direction.

        In my post, "ON CENSORSHIP AND BANNING: BOB DYLAN VERSUS JOHN LENNON AND MORE," I wrote the following:

        Recently, a rabbi made Torah statement supporting committing genocide. He later qualified his statements saying that he meant in self-defense only. I posted on it: "DESTROY THEIR HOLY SITES. KILL (ARAB) MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, WROTE JEWISH RABBI MANIS FRIEDMAN OF THE CHABAD-LUBAVITCH MOVEMENT." This rabbi had even attracted the famous singer/song writer, Bob Dylan, who is a born-again Christian. (See: "Chabad rabbi: Jews should kill Arab men, women and children during war," by Nathaniel Popper. Haaretz. June 10, 2009. Since he said this, is it now "illegal" to link to him wherever he is? His views are in many ways worse than David Duke's. Duke doesn't call for genocide. He's wrongheaded, but he isn't calling for exterminating any nation/family/tribe of people. He's a self-defense person too. I am not. Neither was Jesus. Duke says Europeans have a right to pride every bit as much as any other group. I'm against pride. So is Jesus.The rabbi is right that the Torah calls for extermination in no uncertain terms. The god of that is the god of those-who-take-deserve. That god is the god of fleshly survival of the fittest and the fittest are the mightiest, violent warriors. That god is not my God. That god is not the God of Jesus. This truth is not going to be seen and understood via a cursory overview of the Bible. It isn't going to happen by listening to capitalist, war-advocating, self-described, Christian preachers. Understand here that I'm not saying the Yahweh is not the God of Jesus. I'm saying that Yahweh is God and was severely misunderstood. I'm saying Jesus came to explain God/Yahweh — to remove the hypocrisy that was inherent in Moses's teaching. Jesus also said that Moses gladly accepts Jesus's more enlightening instructions. I believe it.

        We are taking back the language, per Isaiah and Jesus.

        Mark my words. The word does not belong to Satan, and he may not keep it. He has one real choice. Repent forever. Otherwise, he lives in the Hell of his own devising. Truth.

      • Thomas,

        Your connecting this with Jesus's teaching is exactly right! It's why they murdered him and are dead. Stay at it. Righteousness wins out. Twisting is lost.

        Patience, perseverance, and no fear,

        Tom