JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY, RUSH LIMBAUGH, JAMES VON BRUNN, AND OTHER MATTERS: REAL CHRISTIANITY IS THE ONLY WAY

JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY, RUSH LIMBAUGH, JAMES VON BRUNN, AND OTHER MATTERS: REAL CHRISTIANITY IS THE ONLY WAY

This is too long and too timely and newsworthy to keep as a comment. Not enough people are savvy enough to dig down into comments where much of the action is. This post is a comment-reply to Ernie's comment on my post, "RUSH LIMBAUGH SAYS JAMES VON BRUNN WAS A LEFTIST: LIMBAUGH'S POSSESSION ON DISPLAY."

First, please read my other post and Ernie's comment.

Hello Ernie,

First, your comment was in spam. Second, I approved it earlier but apparently lost my connection before that went through to the database. It was not my intention to delay your comment.

Let's look at the delusional view: Anarchy [no government] on the extreme right versus totalitarian dictatorships [total government] on the extreme left.

God's Heaven is governed: enough said? Consensus, local, council communism is not a dictatorship al a Stalin. God and Jesus are not Stalin-like. Stalin superimposed rightwing dictatorship on top of what he rendered into mere lip-service words, such as "socialism" and "communism."

The Birchers have held with a sort of anarcho-capitalism since their inception under that name (John Birch Society). If you are viewing time as the full continuum from the beginning of Einsteinian time and not the infinite time of God, then the Birchers' proposition is a recent introduction. The Birchers were funded by the Koch family {one, Ernie Lazar, believes that there is insufficient evidence to support the claim (and that it might have started as a mere rumor?)}. Their wealth came from the negative exploitation of other peoples. They want no restrictions upon their ability to continue that. They want private armies to defend their self-authorized right to do this. They are opposed to conscience. They are opposed to Jesus. They claim that coercion is bad except when used to force others to submit to the negative exploitation mentioned above. Their position of course is utter hypocrisy and evil. They use their money to fund think tanks, such as the Cato Institute, to pay for self-styled intellectuals to devise methods of mass manipulation. Redefining words to suit them is the primary method. Censoring and banning competing ideas, such as Jesus's, is another. Getting minions and dupes (sycophants) to further the cause of the superrich is yet another.

I do not disagree with everything they say because everyone can and, from God's perfect perspective, does speak partial-truths. Semantical understanding is key.

The Birchers equate coercion with evil. Within the right context, it is true. However, they do not have that right context. That right context is always consistent. Turning the other cheek is an always or fail proposition. The Libertarians (and the low-level Birchers who fancy themselves a type of Libertarian) often hold with anti-war, non-interventionism, anti-imperialism, etc. However, the high-level superrich do not ultimately hold with those things but rather manipulate government to do their bidding that is definitely imperialistic in the worldly antichrist sense.

You are absolutely correct that they use the terms "statism" and "statist" to condemn every control upon their ability to rape all the rest of the peoples of the world and the planet itself. They refer to the mixed economy, whether of the neocons or liberals, as crony capitalism, which is true. It is heading in the direction of state capitalism (not pure communism). What is that though but the ultimate logical conclusion of the pseudo-hands-off approach of the Birchers (rhetorical). Left to their devices, a selfish monopoly would result. That is state capitalism (ostensibly socialistic) under a dictator: the richest person in the world as an actual monarch with total sovereignty and with everyone else his private property. Stalin was the sovereign. Regardless of his words, in Stalin's eyes, God and the people were not sovereign.

This is the battle between light and darkness: truth and falsehood. It is a duality. It is denounced as Manichean by some, but it goes back way before the Persian Manes. The debate is from the Biblical and proverbial "beginning." "Let there be light" speaks directly to it. It was good. It is symbolic. It is figurative. It stands in for, and actually is, within context, the issues we face always until perfection.

God is perfect even though God is completely aware of all evil. This presents a paradox concerning which many, most, and at sometimes all, cannot reconcile. I am reconciled to it without problem.

I call upon the world to consider these things that it has never.

I am a son of God. I am a son of Man.

If thou sayest, Behold, we knew not this; Doth not he that weigheth the hearts consider it? And he that keepeth thy soul, doth not he know it? And shall not he render to every man according to his work? (Proverbs 24:12 ASV)

You see, Jesus read this and understood better than Solomon.

So shall he sprinkle many nations; the kings shall shut their mouths at him: for that  which had not been told them shall they see; and that  which they had not heard shall they consider. (Isaiah 52:15 KJVR)

Many people calling themselves Christians are doing the bidding of the high priest of mammon. They have been led astray by antichrists. They do not understand the cleaning of the temple of the moneychangers. They buy into the stories of antichrists told to deceive.

Many say that it is the love of money that is the root of all evil; however, they don't read that in the full context of everything Jesus said and did. The fact that the love of money is the root of all evil does not preclude that money itself came out from evil, which it did.

The so-called Christian capitalists say that there is no better system. They say that they are not being antichrist when they take instruction from antichrists about what is to those so-called Christian capitalists deem worldly economics separable from their spiritual path. They are woefully wrong.

There is a better and best system that Jesus revealed and that was revealed to him and to a lesser degree others before Jesus walked the Earth as Jesus. There is no money required in Heaven, and the one corporate prayer of real Christians as given by Jesus asks Heaven to come to the Earth.

Let it be so.

Now, there is no doubting that those who have not accepted Jesus as the Messiah, prophesied in the Bible and promised and desired in so many other stories down through history, include many who call themselves Jews. However, there are Jews who accept Jesus. Also, Jesus was a Jew. Also, there is no doubting that the heads of many banks are Jewish. This is not mere coincidence. It does not though mean "all Jews" this or "all Jews" that. To be anti-Jew is to be anti-Jesus. To be anti-Capitalist or anti-Marxist is not to be anti-Jewish (ethnic). To be anti-Babylonian Talmudic Judaism is not to be necessarily anti-Jewish or anti-Semitic. You didn't mention Michael A. Hoffman. Any particular reason for that?

Truth is required.

Now therefore know and consider what thou wilt do; for evil is determined against our master, and against all his household: for he is such a son of Belial, that a man cannot speak to him. Then Abigail made haste, and took two hundred loaves, and two bottles of wine, and five sheep ready dressed, and five measures of parched corn, and an hundred clusters of raisins, and two hundred cakes of figs, and laid them on asses. (1 Samuel 25:17-18 KJV)

Smart woman

The churl is a son of Belial, and I cannot speak to him on account of his thickheadedness and unwillingness properly to use the language to show truth and righteousness. He rather obfuscates to protect his selfish and fleeting possessions.

Remember, partial-truths are what we want to avoid on all sides so that we may become one with God who is the truth.

Now, there is a New World Order (NWO) coming. We must consider the latter end. The NWO will start out as coercive but will completely be displaced by the wholly voluntary under the precepts of Jesus Christ. This is the inevitable real World Order restored.

Mammon is not Godly.

The first state of man was communist, not Marxist, but where the Earth was the Commons. The rightful inheritance of each and all has been stolen by lying words.

Let me make clear and plain that the political spectrum of left and right as used in your article is false. It is a false spectrum designed to avoid the message of Christ.

Is it ironic that both Jesus and Marx were Jews and that both held with owning all things in common? A difference lies in coercion. Marx advocated violence to attain communal ownership. The "purist" of the libertarians only advocate violence to defend their right to private property and to obtain that property (an inherently flawed proposition). Jesus advocated that no coercion be used on those outside the faith, which faith is voluntary.

This is avoided by the self-styled intellectuals whether Jewish or Gentile and whether on the right or left of the false spectrum. The Koch's are Jewish afterall and fund the libertarians in their pro-tobacco efforts and such. It is a contradiction? Of course it is not. Jews come in all stripes right now right along with Gentiles. It's a fact.

Now, lo, if he beget a son, that seeth all his father's sins which he hath done, and considereth, and doeth not such like, That hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, hath not defiled his neighbour's wife, Neither hath oppressed any, hath not withholden the pledge, neither hath spoiled by violence, but hath given his bread to the hungry, and hath covered the naked with a garment, That hath taken off his hand from the poor, that hath not received usury nor increase, hath executed my judgments, hath walked in my statutes; he shall not die for the iniquity of his father, he shall surely live. (Ezekiel 18:14-17 KJV)

The promise of Jesus is that those who see the light and change from wickedness also will not die for the iniquities of their fathers. Consider it well.

Beyond Cato, one must look at Lew Rockwell and Murray Rothbard and such. Ron Paul adheres to the Ludwig von Mises school of mammon worshipping. Much of this comes out from the tradition of slavery in the Deep South and Texas. That's why there is so much racism mixed in. Also, the Babylonian Talmud and the spiritual descendants of the Pharisees are in direct opposition to Jesus. This too has had its influence. Again though, it is critical that we not lump people together. Ezekiel was completely correct in that. We are not our fathers and mothers, although we can atone for them in the eyes of God. We can show that Satan is wrong that all humanity is worthy of eternal torture.

Jesus showed Satan wrong. That's the message. The message is also that we may follow in Jesus's footsteps. We do not have to remain selfish (churls) and vile (harmful and depraved). We can and will bring forth the Christian Commons.

The Christian Commons is not bloodline oriented. It is spiritline oriented. Many libertarians are coming to realize that spiritline is what matters and that real freedom is not the self-licensing to acquire and amass and hoard in fear but rather freedom from evil that is inclusive of acquiring and amassing and hoarding in fear.

The language is being taken back by Christ. The debate is being reframed in truth seeking and not censoring before engagement on rational and reasonable grounds. Jesus was the most rational and reasonable being I have ever heard of. Can you name anyone more sane?

I have been having a discussion over on InfoWars.com. Please note that I have been given to understand that the site's founder, Alex Jones, is married to a Jewish woman. {I don't recall where I read that. Please inform me if it's incorrect, not that it matters much. (It turns out that she is not, per Alex himself.)} At any rate, Alex is not anti-Semitic. That's not a full endorsement of everything Alex says or does. I don't subscribe to all of his interpretations, characterizations, and prognostications. I do glean the true portions from the partial-truths: our job as truth seekers. Alex is for violence. I am a total pacifist with Jesus. Alex is for capitalism. I am for the completely voluntary, universal, consensus-based, giving-and-sharing-all economy with Jesus.

The conversation is at the bottom of that page, as I came late to the sound-bite-based thread. Much of the "debate" above it is shallow. There are a few comments that go into depth. It is my first foray there. The timing is indicative of the movement of the Holy Spirit within.

Here's my last comment post there just to give you an idea:

@ Just the Truth [commentator's "handle"; I'm reply to "Just the Truth"]

I can keep it fairly short I think. Let me clarify, as I can see how my words were taken not as intended. (This is why dialoguing is good.) When I wrote, "The prophecy is that all finally turn and become one," I was referring to the remnant of which you wrote. My point was that they do become Christians. My belief, which is consistent with Jesus's teachings, is that Christians are the real Jews and that those who call themselves Jews today but reject Jesus are false to the spirit of Jacob (Israel). I won't go into it here unless it presents a problem and you want me to elaborate.

You wrote, "There is nothing merciful about encouraging them in their delusions of grandeur." Blessing them doesn't encourage that. Jesus said to bless the people who hate you. They hate it when people who disagree with them bless them. It shames them. That's not the reason for blessing them though. If they don't turn and develop the ability to think with the higher portions of their brain (frontal and temporal lobes where unselfishness and connectedness reside), well, you can't force them. You did though want it for them and ask it of them. When it comes time for your soul, you'll not be cast out for selfishness or being unable to connect.

You don't think Jesus was wrong about blessing them. You know what I mean. Just accept it. Bless them. If you refuse, you're being stubborn. Don't be that.

As for atheists, many of them believe there is nothing after death. They don't believe in the metaphysical. They don't believe in spirit. I'm being intentionally simplistic here. I could delve into all sorts of things, but it isn't necessary right here and right now.

Well, you are passionate. What are you going to do though? Jesus says that you are not to take lives. You are not to resist evil. If they hit you, turn your other cheek to them. If they spit on you, whip you, beat you, laugh at you, scorn you, lie about you, stab you, take your guns, knock down your house, steal your land, cut down your olive trees, dump their raw sewage on your crops, poison your wells, imprison you, torture and even crucify you until your flesh gives up the ghost, you are to forgive them for their ignorance and not wish upon them all that they have done upon anyone including you. That's what Jesus has said, and it's right too. If you don't understand how that can be, I'm willing to discuss it but only in earnest.

As for the censorship here concerning the Talmud, compromises are often forced upon us. Alex Jones has undoubtedly bumped up against a warning. If he crosses the line, it might mean a huge crimp on being able to get out there the things he wants out there. I cross the line on the RLCC site that he won't allow anyone to cross here. My style though is very different. I am interested in seeing all sides and getting at the root of the problem. I can't mix assault rifles and my Christianity for instance. Mixing assault rifles and mottos such as "Come and take it" with Christianity doesn't work. Trying indicates a failure of consistency. It's hypocrisy. Of course, not everyone is looking to do what Jesus said to do: be perfect.

I'm working on it. I want it. I believe it is there. I believe the offer is genuine. I trust Jesus. I trust God.

Peace, love, and truth are one,

Tom Usher

Let me clearly and plainly state again here if it hasn't sunk in that partial-truths come out from all mundane sides. Just because a racist says something doesn't mean that the statement is false. A racist may say he is standing on the street corner and actually be standing on the street corner. Likewise, just because an anti-racist says something doesn't mean that the statement is true. An anti-racist can say that refusing to accept the message of Jesus is not a bad thing. Refusing to accept the message of Jesus though is a bad thing. The problem is that many people don't know the meaning of "bad." What they consider bad is not the whole of what bad contains. This is the issue of Semantical Theology that the RLCC is about showing to the world.

In addition, we must not conflate false-Zionism with Semitism. Real Zionism is real Christianity. Jesus was a real Zionist. Benjamin Netanyahu and Avigdor Lieberman and other Likudniks are not real Zionists. They came out from atheists such as Herzl, who founded the false brand of Zionism and who is actually anti-Semitic for having done what is not good for Jews. What is good for Jews is Jesus.

Also, Semites include Palestinians. It is an obnoxious and foolish proposition that so many Jews and Palestinians can be anti-Shem accept in spirit. Regardless, Jesus is over Shem.

Pay attention to the contradiction in Israel being a "Jewish" state. Where does humanity draw the line? It's the wrong debate. Jesus doesn't draw the race or ethnic line. There are those who misinterpret Jesus when he put it to the Greek woman.

For a certain woman, whose young daughter had an unclean spirit, heard of him, and came and fell at his feet: The woman was a Greek, a Syrophenician by nation; and she besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter. But Jesus said unto her, Let the children first be filled: for it is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it unto the dogs. And she answered and said unto him, Yes, Lord: yet the dogs under the table eat of the children's crumbs. And he said unto her, For this saying go thy way; the devil is gone out of thy daughter. (Mark 7:25-29 KJVR)

You see, she was Greek and understood the nature of God and was, therefore, no enemy of Christ but rather his spiritual sister and, in reality, his fleshly sister as well.

Let's not hide the fact that Moses called for complete genocide. Jesus explained that the laws of Moses were for the hardhearted. How right Jesus is! Moses was wrong. We forgive him though, as we need forgiving.

What many neo-Nazis believe is that the White non-Jews should do to the Jews what Moses said to his followers that they must do (or suffer) to the non-Israelite tribes of Canaan. Moses was wrong and so was Hitler.

Religious-and-political-bloodline calls for extermination come out from wrath. Jesus never called down, nor will he ever call down, the wrath. He was and remains resigned to the separation of right from wrong and the destruction of wrong. He spoke the truth, and those who want the answers find him and he finds them.

You wrote on your site, "...the Federal Reserve which included his assertion that Wall Street bankers funded the Bolshevik Revolution.... Again, this type of thinking is exclusively the product of extreme right-wing ideology."

No it's not. Jesus does not stand with capitalism whether so-called pure or crony or mixed. I do not stand with mammon, with banks, with bankers, with usury, with mediums of exchange, with trade, with holding out for recompense, or any of the rest of such evil concepts. I do not like being in this world where the commons has been stolen. I seek it back for the sake of the many. I come in the name of the LORD, perfecting.

Satan conspires. So too does God. Truth.

Ernie, you are familiar with J. Edgar Hoover's Palmer Raids, right? You are familiar with Hoover's proposed plan to put all those who disagreed with his interpretation of Americanism into concentration camps, right? You do know about COINTELPRO, right? You do know what incitement is. You know what agents provocateurs are. The FBI is still loaded with all of that. You do know that the FBI at the top is just another tool of the Empire. You aren't one of those "there is no Empire" people are you? You aren't one of those "the superrich don't control anything" people are you?

You wrote on your site that you aren't a member of anything.

Someone pays you. You are beholden.

Are you for or against Jesus? Are you for or against the capitalist system? Just because you might be against it doesn't mean you are for anything else as defined by anyone else (save God).

Peace,

Tom Usher

  • Subscribe
  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.