HOSSEIN MOUSAVI: HOW CIA?

HOSSEIN MOUSAVI: HOW CIA?

While the Western Media is busy carrying out the directives of the CIA to demonize Ahmadinejad beyond all reality, while the CIA has agents throughout Iran giving out money and advice on how to cause as much trouble for Iran as possible {See: "Preparing the Battlefield: The Bush Administration steps up its secret moves against Iran," by Seymour M. Hersh. The New Yorker. July 7, 2008; CIA, DIA, NSA, Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC)}, Hossein Mousavi inflames his followers to riot in the streets knowing full well that there are violent forces in opposition and that injuries and even death may and have resulted.

I do not condone for a moment the reaction of the Iranian Basij militia. They are not doing Iran or Ahmadinejad any favor with all their violence on the crowds. At the same time though, it is highly irresponsible and selfish and shortsighted of Hossein Mousavi to encourage the crowds and rioters.

They are not mere peaceful protesters all. Many no doubt would like to peacefully assemble to rally support for their cause. Clearly though, there are many in the crowds who were whipped up into a frenzy of mob mentality. Photos show "protesters" grinning while fleeing riot police and Basiji. This is not good all the way around.

The people should not be rioting. They should not be burning tires (extreme air pollution; thoughtless and highly negative). They should not be overturning cars or burning buses. That's other people's property. It's wanton destruction.

I am thoroughly dis-impressed by both sides, and I'm disgusted by the American CIA and the Israeli Mossad for their parts in all of this.

George W. Bush gave the go ahead for infiltrating Iran to attempt to topple the regime just as the U.S. has done over and over again in country after country around the world. Barack Obama claims to deplore the violence and deaths, but he has not rescinded the Bush directives to the CIA and DIA.

The Pentagon in conjunction with the CIA has done special ops in Iran. It has been behind some assassinations of high ranking members of the Iranian military. It has been responsible for several bombings. They are deep under cover and are not yet at the point where they can cause widespread violence; but they are working up to it.

I am not in favor of the Islamic theocracy. The alternative that is being offered though is not any better. In some ways, it's worse. In many ways, many of the backers of Hossein Mousavi are interested in bringing in decadence. They aren't thinking clearly. Their hearts are in the wrong place.

It's sad to watch what the Iranians are doing to each other with their enemies also watching and taking pleasure in the infighting they have facilitated.

Don't fool yourself that Hossein Mousavi is unaware of the CIA's presents and influence. He could very well be an operative. I would be surprised if he is not on some level working directly with the U.S. Empire against the best interests of the Iranian people as a whole.

None of this is necessary. These people are not talking truth to each other. They are not doing truth towards one another. What I see in what they are all doing is darkness and not light. They are lacking love and compassion for each other. They are lacking care and concern. They are doing a great deal of harm, much more than seems to be the case on the surface even though the killing and injuries are terrible (they always are no matter who's doing it or suffering).

I'm not disappointed in Barack Obama's woefully inadequate leadership because I didn't have my hopes up in the slightest. He is being exactly what he appeared to be from the very moment I first heard him: completely unimpressive, weak, shallow — as one of my friends said, just a darker shade of Bush. He's what the powers gave the people and what the people winked back at the powers that they want though. You reap what you sow and you are what you buy and eat.

He's not the bread and wine I want.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • See: "Preparing the Battlefield: The Bush Administration steps up its secret moves against Iran," by Seymour M. Hersh. The New Yorker. July 7, 2008; CIA, DIA, NSA, Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC)

    • Sabour Jaan

      things are gonna get a lot worse before they get better

      • Things are going to reach their worst before things become perfect.

    • Very well written and accurate article. We are looking at Operation Ajax II and many Americans are not yet aware. Let the truth be told in the near future :)

      • Thank you, Taiyo. Ajax II is apt. This one will fail though. It will take more than a replay of Ajax to fool the world thanks to people such as you.

        The U.S. is just going to have to be a self-admitted, brutal, decadent Empire (no mask) until it burns out. The "exceptionalism" cover has been blown.

        The fact that 2/3's of Americans are for torture shows the U.S. is more immoral than moral. There are many other aspects that show it. The American people have been winking back and forth at each other for too long.

        They all knew that Obama said he was going to rev up the wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan even though the tribal peoples there had zero to do with 9/11, just as was the case with Saddam and all the rest of the Iraqis.

        The excuse of ignorance has disappeared. Either America gets a severe attack of conscience, or this Empire is going down sooner than later. That attack of conscience better spread to Israel too.

        On account of what they've been exposed doing, Israel probably tops the U.S. as the world's most hated nation. It really looks bad for them. Netanyahu's speech was a big dud just as was Obama's Cairo speech. They don't get it yet.

        They aren't going to be given passes anymore. There's a new standard. They're having a difficult time with it. Get with it or fall.