The U.S. CIA allowed Pakistan to acquire nuclear weapons. It actually facilitated Pakistan in doing so. It has long been known that the U.S. is not run by the three branches of government on any equal footing. It has long been known that the U.S. is being run by the wealthiest capitalist-socialists operating behind the scenes calling the shots. These are superrich so-called Blue Bloods whose children attend the most elite private educational facilities and who are groomed and screened. They are groomed to do the bidding of the system of their fathers and father's fathers and are screen out if they show signs of righteousness as their root spirit.

These select ones do not have minds of their own but are given over to the cause of the dark side even as they show a front of righteousness (twisted, half-truths, selected topics only): wolves in sheep's clothing.

Occasionally, both inadvertently and deliberately, the system misjudges a character and the result is a whistleblower. Some leaks are intentional. Others are not. At the highest (lowest, darkest) levels, such unintentional leaks do not occur except where God intervenes in the most direct, literal sense.

Rich Barlow leaked (blew the whistle) concerning the CIA's providing A. Q. Kahn with nuclear-weapons secrets and material sources and financing to buy Pakistan. Pakistan belongs to the Empire. That has been obvious for decades, even before the nuclear-weapons deals. This is why A. Q. Kahn was released from prison where he had been treated to a country club life, relatively speaking.

The Congress knows this but does nothing. Why? Congress is bought and paid for as well. Its members (most; nearly all) are afraid to speak out. Too many speaking out would bring on a civil war, but that's not the reason they don't speak. They fear assassination for turning. Very, very few speak out. They are not killed unless they gain traction with the masses. The elitists are decidedly against losing their self-created positions. If their propaganda starts to fail, they will murder without hesitation. They will murder tens of millions to retain their positions. In the end, nothing matters but self to them. That self is apart from God. They make themselves all little Satans.

Read the linked article: "US allowed Pak to acquire N-tech, kept Cong in dark." Hindustan Times. June 16, 2009.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.