ISRAEL'S BOUGHT-AND-PAID-FOR MOUTHPIECE: FALSE-ZIONIST ELLIOT ABRAMS VERSUS HILLARY, THE FALSE-ZIONIST, CLINTON
Hamas is willing to accept Israel, but it isn't willing to accept it as a "Jewish" state, saying that would be racist and Nazi-like.
Now Elliot Abrams and the Illegal Settlements:
Elliot Abrams has written a piece in The Wall Street Journal, "Hillary Is Wrong About the Settlements: The U.S. and Israel reached a clear understanding about natural growth" (June 26, 2009) in which he states that the U.S. under George W. Bush agreed to Israeli settlements. Abrams takes issue with Hillary Clinton who said that the Bush record contains nothing enforceable. He writes, "This is a strange phrase. How exactly would Israel enforce any agreement against an American decision to renege on it? Take it to the International Court in The Hague?"
Well, it isn't strange at all since she is clearly talking about what was being said at the time that Bush was making such "concessions," which statements in the press and especially in alternative news media and with which I agreed at the time and still do that is that Bush didn't have the authority to make the illegal settlements legal simply on his say so.
U.N. resolutions still say that the Green Line (pre-1967 War) border is the enforceable border — the internationally legal border.
Now, how does someone as thick as Elliot Abrams become a senior fellow for Middle Eastern Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations? How does he rate ever having been a member of the National Security Council? Money, the people who have it by taking the inheritance of others from them, bought those positions for him, of course.