Roger Bados of the Bloque Popular & the National Resistance Front has been assassinated by three gun shots in Honduras. Ramon Garcia of the National Resistance Front and president of a cement workers union was also assassinated by the coup.

The foreign journalists of the Telesur network have all been expelled.

The coup has hired former Clinton advisors to represent them in Washington and in Costa Rica before President Oscar Arias.

Lanny Davis, former Special Counsel for President Bill Clinton (they went to Yale Law School together), is working for the Latin American Business Council. Davis testified for the coup to the House Foreign Relations Committee. Davis said, "democracy and civil liberties are flourishing in Honduras."

How can he say that when peaceful demonstrators are shot dead, swept up in mass arrests, journalists deported, and political and union leaders are assassinated, etc.? What kind of man is this Lanny Davis? Does he love fascism? Apparently he loves money more than truth.

Otto Reich, also testified to the Committee. He was Assistant Secretary for Western Hemisphere Affairs under George W. Bush. Bill Van Auken reports some of Reich's despicable history. He is best known as an anti-Castro Cuban. He was directly involved with the Contras who were mostly members of the former dictator's National Guard that became Ronald-Reagan-backed death squads attacking Nicaragua.

The Reagan administration did illegal secret weapons deals with Iran to fund the Contras and to get Iran to influence Hezbollah to release hostages in Lebanon (called the Iran-Contra Affair) against U.S. Congressional prohibition on funding the dirty wars in Central America and against the arms embargo against Iran. Israel played the intermediary between the U.S. and Iran. Reagan denied knowledge but how could he have not known? It was huge. Lots of records were illegally destroyed too. It should have brought down Reagan, but Americans in general are too selfish to be right.

Reich also helped CIA agent and terrorist Luis Posada Carriles and his underling, Orlando Bosch, avoid Venezuelan and Cuban justice concerning the downing in 1976 of a Cuban Douglas DC-8 aircraft. All 73 people on board were killed in the midair bombing. Reich was also deeply involved in the failed George W. Bush CIA-backed coup against Hugo Chavez in 2002.

Bennett Ratcliff, a close Clinton advisor, handled the meeting in Costa Rica. Ratcliff presented that Zelaya can return as president but must have no power. He may not do anything further to empower the poor or the general population. He must stop befriending Hugo Chavez, which probably means that he would have to pull out of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas. He must share governance with the coup leaders. He must agree to blanket amnesty to the coup plotters and executers. Eva Golinger also says that Hillary Clinton approved those points. How Eva knows that aspect, she didn't say.

Since the coup was completely illegal, the U.S. government should not support any of those conditions. Zelaya would be helping to establish a bad precedent were he to accept the conditions. Ginger Thompson reported though, "Zelaya indicated that he was willing to accept a compromise that would return him to office with significantly limited powers."

Tom Hayden adds that Clinton types such as James Carville and Stanley Greenberg are political consultants for reactionaries in Latin America. I never did like neoliberalism and the Democratic Leadership Council sellouts. Bill Clinton did as much as anyone to kill the Good Neighbor Policy of Franklin Roosevelt.

Fernando Joya Amendola is also involved in the coup. He was known as Captain Billy Joya who headed up the infamous Battalion 3-16, one of the worst death squads in Central America. They murdered and tortured countless numbers of people in a reign of terror. They were generally a part of the network of American led and supported capitalist fascism throughout Latin America.

The longer they delay, the less Zelaya will probably be willing to compromise. Why he offered, if he truly did, doesn't make much sense.

Posts covering Honduras


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.