The following applies only to some Jews, not all Jews. Racism and ethnic bigotry are evil. So don't throw the term anti-Semitic at me. It doesn't hold up. It's dumb to try to twist the term to make it fit here.

Israel to the European Union and Russia: go to Hell.

Israel has been told to stop building in East Jerusalem. They have said they will do what they want in East Jerusalem even though international agreements and law say that such construction is illegal. Remember, Israel claims international legitimacy based upon U.N. resolutions that allowed Israel to come into existence as a political nation-state. Israel wants to pick and choose which international laws it will acknowledge. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's current Prime Minister said, "Israel will not agree to edicts of this kind in East Jerusalem." Russia, France, Germany, and Sweden (also the U.S.) have told Israel to stop. Sweden currently holds the rotating position of European Union president. (See: "Israel has indisputable right to build in East Jerusalem," by Barak Ravid. Haaretz. July 21, 2009.)

Israel's response is in effect, make us stop if you think you can. It's unbelievably arrogant. It's spitting in the face of those who sanctioned Israel to have some of the Palestinian's land for the State of Israel.

Rabbi lying about Vatican intentions vis-a-vis Hezbollah

Meanwhile, the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America and the chief rabbi of Safed, Rabbi Shmuel Eliahu, have created a booklet entitled "On Either Side of the Border," that's been widely distributed to many members of the Israeli Defense Force, which booklet alleges that because the Vatican had Hezbollah members visit Nazi concentration camps that the Vatican is deliberately teaching Hezbollah how to exterminate Jews. "Vatican teaching Hezbollah how to kill Jews, says pamphlet for IDF troops," by Ofri Ilani. Haaretz. July 19, 2009.


When I tried to post that in a comment on the ABC News site, they kept deleting it to censor that and other news.

Fascist, Nazi-like, Avigdor Lieberman, and other Jews seeking to forbid truth of Nakba

Also, the fascist-Nazi-like Jew, Avigdor Lieberman, wants to outlaw Israeli Arabs from commemorating the Nakba on Israeli's Independence Day. Nakba means catastrophe. It refers to the near ethnic cleansing of the area of Palestine now called Israel by many in the world. Lieberman's efforts were shot down because of the global outcry against such Nazi-like tactics. Nevertheless, Lieberman's Party, Yisrael Beiteinu, submitted a watered-down version which calls for pulling government-funding support for any group that does commemorate the Nakba. That watered-down version is still denounced by civilized people but has just been passed out of the Knesset's Constitution, Law and Justice Committee. Just how far withholding funding can be carried remains to be seen. If no funding for police activity is supplied, then one might assume that the fascists would withhold any permits or the like for any public commemorations thereby making them illegal and their participants subject to being murdered by having high-velocity teargas canisters blasted at their heads, as has happened to peacefully assembled protestors in Palestine. All sorts of twists on the law could be employed to crack down on peaceful demonstrators. The excuses are always extremely shallow. The fascists don't worry much about whether the world disagrees. They just want what they want and will pursue it no matter how stupid it is. "Labor Min. to Lieberman: Nakba bill sullies Israel's image." Haaretz. July 19, 2009.

The Nakba is as the Cherokee's Trail of Tears

In addition, according to the Education Ministry, Israel is going to remove "Nakba" from textbooks. You know, this is so immature. I find a great deal of Israel's policies and attitudes to be immature. I've never said that before, but this really strikes me as petty. It's small. Israel is always going to be a small people no matter the size of its population if it continues on this level. Netanyahu has said term "Nakba" is propaganda against Israel. It's propaganda, but it's truth. It was a catastrophe. If the same thing had happened to the Jews, Netanyahu would be wining about it. The Palestinians are not wrong to call it the Nakba. You know, the Zionists are famous for putting it to Americans how Americans would react if rockets were fired into America from Canada or Mexico, not that the situation would be parallel; but if that analogy works for the Zionists, then put to Americans whether the Trail of Tears should be wiped from the pages of textbooks. The Education Ministry said, "It is inconceivable that in Israel we would talk about the establishment of the state as a catastrophe." Well, in America, rather than run from our sins, we turned the Trail of Tears into a National Historic Trail so we won't forget how brutal we were and should never be again. Unfortunately, we have leadership too that has a conveniently short memory as it bombs Pakistan's Pashtuns.

Welcome to the Trail of Tears National Historic Trail
Come on a journey to remember and commemorate the survival of the Cherokee people despite their forced removal from their homelands in the Southeastern United States in the 1830s.

Nakba is Nakba to the people who are able to be sorry for what they did to the Cherokee. I'm glad Netanyahu isn't the President of the United States (although I'm not happy with Obama).

Get back behind the Green Line

We also continue to hear the fascists repeating that they won't stop building in occupied East Jerusalem even though that area is on the Palestinian side of the Green Line. The Green Line is the pre-1967-War border. It's the internationally recognized border because Israel started the '67 War, and no state is allowed to gain territory by wars of aggression. The former prime minister of Israel, Menachem Begin, openly admitted that Israel launched the war. Netanyahu says that Israel owns East Jerusalem and that the Palestinians will not have it as the capital of Palestine.

Rabbis personally profiting at the expense of the poor and sick

In the meantime, in New Jersey, 5 rabbis along with a host of politicians have been arrested for alleged participation in racketeering. They been accused by the federal government of money laundering, extortion, bribery, and trafficking in human organs. The rabbis are Saul Kassin, Eliahu Ben Haim, Edmund Nahum, Mordchai Fish, and Levy Izhak Rosenbaum. The money movement involved Israelis in Israel as well. The rabbis controlled Jewish charities in New Jersey and New York. They allegedly used the charities to launder ten of millions of dollars.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.