Mike Morrell (Sites Unseen – Earth's Mightiest Alternative Christian Link Portal) posted the following on his Facebook profile:

A Jew & A Christian explore the Lord's Prayer, together - a cool NPR interview about the new 'A Prayer to Our Father'
WFAE 90.7 FM
WFAE 90.7 FM

I listened, and what follows are my thoughts:

Nehemia Gordon and Keith Johnson have written a book entitled, "A Prayer to Our Father." NPR decided to interview them. You should listen to the interview before or while reading the following notes.

The interviewer didn't think Muslims would have a problem with referring to God as our father. He doesn't know that not referring to God as the father is one of the central points of Islam. There is no familial relationship of human being and God in Islam. It is the main separation between the Judeo-Christian and Islam.

Nehemia Gordon finds "May your name be sanctified" a call to action but "Hallowed be thy name" as being vague. It doesn't strike me that way at all. It says to me to hold God as Holy in every sense. I also don't find all the Hebrew puns completely missing in the Greek or English, since the words still translate. Neither would Nehemia recognize the puns in Hebrew without studying the word roots, etc. Names in languages have meaning. "Jesus" means "Iesus" means "Yeshua" means YaHoVeH is Salvation means the "I was, I am, I will be" is our father/savior.

One can't Judaize Christ since Jesus was/is a Jew in a certain context also. What can happen though that should not is a diminution of the New Testament message, which message is lacking in the Old Testament else there would have been no need for Jesus. Nehemia doesn't accept Jesus. His Old Testament doesn't require him to rise to it. The world under the Old Testament without the enlightenment of Jesus is retrograde.

Many people calling themselves Christians today are falling to the notion that the chosen one is not Jesus so much as the retrograde.

I sensed a pleasure on Nehemia Gordon's part in participating in the, to me, not so subtle diminution of the message of Christ even as the others on the program appeared to try to more than tolerate it and to even glorify the process of working closely with the orthodox Talmudical, which still finds Jesus anathema.

"Thy kingdom come" versus "Thy kingdom be blessed," again, I don't have any difficulty reconciling the two. To bless is to desire a truthful unfolding. The kingdom can't be blessed while being hidden under a rock. Jesus came to reveal what was not already understood. Coming to that understanding is still in process. The ineffable is to become the here and now. It is not already understood.

As for the difference between "evil" and the "evil one," evil is manifested. There is the evil spirit (one fractured soul) that also manifests in the flesh as shown by iniquitous acts of individuals and groups.

I have many more thoughts on this that run to, among other things, the concepts of Babel and Pentecost. Lastly, I do not intend to and am not cutting off Nehemia. What he will be (become) is not for me to say. My desire is that he be blessed by the enlightening words of Jesus. May his reading go on through the whole New Testament, and may he become a believer in that fuller and fullest message.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.