Now, the guessing game is over. We know beyond doubt that the Teabag movement was created out of whole cloth by astroturf groups like Dick Armey's FreedomWorks and Tim Phillips' Americans for Prosperity, with massive media help from FOX News. We see the Birther fracas — the kind of urban myth-making that should have never made it out of the pages of the National Enquirer — being openly ratified by Congressional Republicans. We've seen Armey's own professionally-produced field manual that carefully instructs conservative goon squads in the fine art of disrupting the democratic governing process — and the film of public officials being terrorized and threatened to the point where some of them required armed escorts to leave the building. We've seen Republican House Minority Leader John Boehner applauding and promoting a video of the disruptions and looking forward to "a long, hot August for Democrats in Congress."
("" by: Sara Robinson. t r u t h o u t. August 7, 2009.)
Well, sure, but you have to understand how the flipside looks. Code Pink actually showed the way to the out-of-power Republican/Libertarians. Different influential "progressives" sent out marching orders too. They rallied their troops to show up for demonstrations all over. The thing is that each back-and-forth or power swing from the left to right and back again on the false ideological spectrum just screams let's be more intense the next time we get power or are out of power.
Actually, the very article cited is begging for those in power now to clamp down hard or else. Clamp down on the supposedly would-be fascists out of power, as if doing so isn't tyrannical.
Yes, it's very difficult to speak to people who are in a frenzy and are only seeing red. Tempers cause wars. Tempers are whipped up to rattle the spears in Mar's Temple. Words aren't defined. Facts aren't checked on purpose. Millions of little lies are the Big Lie. Both sides walk this false path. They hear what they want to hear and censor everything else.
The monied people started it all and pay to continue it. They think they can hold the tiger by its tail. The most "tame" tiger can get fed up. Then the wrath is unleashed. The power is more than the Pentagon can model or war game. The rich are slaughtered. The poor are slaughtered.
The rich think they've paid to have it all figured out now. There's no way that they haven't a handle on it all. Their system anticipates everything. Their system has a built-in contingency plan for everything imaginable except that their hirelings have limited imaginations.
I just received a one-liner comment (read the rules) by someone unwilling to capitalize his name who said I have a good imagination. Context....
What is liberty? For reasons of selfishness, the libertarians think it's capitalism. Well, some of them actually want others to think of them as Christian too. No, they aren't Christian. They are capitalists who will never get their way because it doesn't exist and can't. It isn't possible. Their gurus are fakers.
Read this linked article and the comments. "BuzzFlash.org. August 8, 2009.) Then visit Alex Jones' site, and see the mirror image where that side too becomes the Nazis calling the Nazis, Nazis. Socialists are Nazis are Fascists are Neocons are Libertarians are Liberals are....
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)