The balance ofdoesn't mention what any others think. It's as if Britain, France, Germany, and the U.S. speak for the entire world, which they don't.
Ahmadinejad, no matter whether he's wrong about how many Jews were murdered in the concentration camps, he's telling the truth that the Palestinians, and especially the Gazans now, have been made to pay for the sins particularly of Germans.
The article also tries to conflate Judaism with atheistic Zionism. It tries to continue the brainwashing of the masses with the false idea that those in the state of Israel represent all Semites. The article says Ahmadinejad is anti-Semitic, but the Palestinians and Gazans are Semites. How can Ahmadinejad be an anti-Semite when he's for the Palestinians and Gazans getting back their stolen land?
The article tries to be slick propaganda that goes undetected. If you stop to think about it though, you can see right through it.
Here are two more articles:
"TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Friday underlined that the whole world has the 'duty' to take the responsibility to confront Israel to ensure global peace."
World powers condemn Ahmadinejad for calling Holocaust 'a lie',
By Haaretz Service and Agencies
It's difficult to pin down Ahmadinejad. Sometimes he sounds like he believes that the Nazis committed huge atrocities (murders, etc.) in the concentration camps. Really though, rather than do what the Western leaders always do, which is to just focus in on a few words and then sound huffy and outraged, they should take him up on his challenge. If he wants to debate whether or not the holocaust happened, then debate him. If he wants proof, then supply it. The only reason not to do it is because there is an agenda to divide, conquer, and rule Iran via puppet.
I've legitimate questions concerning how the estimates of the numbers of Nazi victims were made. It is absolutely stupid not to engage the questioners on the level. The people would very quickly be able to see who is being insincere. Of course, such honest dialoguing and researching and disseminating work the exact opposite effect that the Empire builders want. Ahmadinejad knows that and is working it, in his own way.
I don't agree with those who say that the Nazis didn't exterminate very large numbers of people and especially Jews. I would like to have much more solid evidence concerning the numbers though. I've written about that before. Remember, when the U.S. military was estimating that perhaps 30 thousand Iraqis had been killed by the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq, independent and highly respected researchers were saying it was more like 600-900 thousand. That's a huge difference and can be chalked up to lying by the Pentagon for effect. So, why wouldn't the land-thieving, terrorist, atheist Zionists also lie at the end of WWII?
Look at their lies about their attack on Gaza. They committed clear war crimes and crimes against humanity, collective punishment, cold-blooded mass murder, which their own troops have divulged to the whole world; yet, we are supposed to believe that the mind capable of doing what they did to the Gazans wouldn't exaggerate about what the Nazis did.
I used to just accept the 6-million figure. I don't do that anymore. I still believe many, many people died; but I don't just by the 6-million. I would accept it again if the Zionists would engage Ahmadinejad and other "holocaust deniers" head-on and show them wrong and show the 6-million to be a very close estimate based upon more than what I've seen.
I do realize that "qualified" people varied in their estimates from 7 down to maybe 4 million. I do know that there are many "deniers" (can't really call all of them that) say more like 600 thousand down to maybe 60-30 thousand. Then of course there are the ridiculous ones who say the whole thing is made up and that no one was exterminated. Those lower numbers (60-30 thousand) just seem like total false-propaganda after the fact.
Really though, why didn't the ground-penetrating sound-wave technology pick up any mass graves around Auschwitz? How could over a million bodies have been destroyed, burned, etc., without pits to cover the remains and cremains? Are the deniers lying about that they went there and scanned the land with such technology and then challenged the Zionists with their findings daring those Zionists to find the pits? It's a serious question on my part. Where are the answers? I've looked for them. Do I have to become a "researcher" myself just to get basic answers?
How can the Zionists possibly believe that it is in their best interest to let these allegations by the "deniers" go unchallenged? I've seen some attempts at refutation done by the Simon Wiesenthal Center, but those attempts struck me as quite weak and selective considering that they are supposed to be experts on the subject.
Here's an interesting development that goes to the heart of the Zionist question:
UN body urges Israel to allow nuclear inspection
Arab states in the United Nations nuclear assembly on Friday won narrow approval of a resolution urging Israel to put all its atomic sites under the world body's inspection and join the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Israel deplored the measure for singling it out while many of its neighbors remained hostile to its existence, and said it would not cooperate with it.
How can anyone trust a people who won't even say they have nuclear weapons and allow inspections?
Were it not a well-known fact that the Western Allies are game players rather than truth seekers, it would seem strange that the West all lined up with Israel, as if the Arabs aren't right on this issue.
Meanwhile, Zionist Michael Chertoff, Director of Homeland Security under Bush-43, didn't know that Donald Rumsfeld had announced to the world the day before 9/11 that trillions of dollars had gone missing at the Pentagon. However, he concludes (propagandizes) at 2:51 of the following video that the 9/11 Truth Movement is on a par with "holocaust denial" and the Birthers who hold that Obama wasn't born in Hawaii.
I've dealt with "denial" above. As for the Birthers, it is stupid that Obama has not released a certified copy of his full birth certificate. I believe it's there in Hawaii and that he could easily issue a certified copy. Why he hasn't done that is just plain dumb.
At 3:18 of the video, a caller states that 6 of the 9/11 Commission membership made clear that the Commission was very flawed. That Commission was completely controlled by the White House and Dick Cheney's operatives in particular. The caller also mentions that nano thermite has been confirmed in the dust samples from ground zero. Understand that that substance can slice through steel columns and beams and that huge pools of molten steel were under the downed towers weeks after 9/11. Please note that Chertoff and C-SPAN ducked the caller.
The next caller raised the issue of Able Danger. The C-SPAN interviewer didn't even thank the caller for calling and just cut him off and then acted as if he hadn't even brought up Able Danger. C-SPAN is going to fade away if it keeps up that approach. I seem to remember when C-SPAN and even that interviewer wouldn't disrespect honest statements and questions unless a caller were over the top with rage so much so that a viewer couldn't even understand or a guest couldn't even address the caller's concerns. Now it appears that C-SPAN just uses thought-termination techniques with its viewers (just ignore critical questions). I know that that will backfire on them in a huge way.
These people don't understand that they are making themselves accomplices, or they just don't care. They believe they have the upper hand and will be able to hold it. As I've written many, many times, I'm a total pacifist and won't resort to violence or coercion; but I sound the warning alarm here that these Chertoff-types are playing with fire and are going to get their very souls burned if they don't repent.
There needs to be a new and thorough 9/11 investigation. It is the single most important thing that should be done. Abolishing the Federal Reserve System and replacing it with interest-free United States Notes to pay off the National Debt will also be a huge step in the right direction. Full emergency employment with skilled-jobs training by the federal government will also be a huge step.
Easily and completely, we could end the recession/depression in just a few months. We could get the finance, crony capitalists off the backs of all the people forever. We could make things and do it without harming our home planet. All decisions could be consensus based rather than coercive from the top down.
Meanwhile, FOX News neocon Glenn Beck, who fakes that he is a libertarian (libertarians are not for the USA PATRIOT Act, etc.), called Obama a racist with a deep-seated hatred for White people. Obama may be many things, but he hasn't done or said anything to indicate that he is a racist. He'll bomb Black and Brown people just as quickly as he'd bomb White ones if the White powers that be (the richest of the superrich) were to order him to do it.
Obama didn't hesitate off the record to call Black "entertainer" Kayne West a "jackass." Of course, not everyone saw the video of Kayne West back stage yelling and swearing about the racism, as he sees it, at the MTV Video Music Awards. Kayne West was ranting because Beyonce is Black and a young White woman, Taylor Swift, won the award that West claimed Beyonce should have won. So, the fact that Obama said of White Taylor Swift that "seems like a perfectly nice person." "She's getting her award. What's he doing up there?" he also went on to say. That doesn't sound like a racist way of looking at West and Swift. Let's be honest, Glenn Beck!
Stick to the things Barack Obama is really being wrong about. Don't just make it up for ratings because the lies will come back to burn you.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)