According to Sibel Edmonds in the interview article, "Who's Afraid of Sibel Edmonds?":
Marc Grossman, was the U.S. ambassador to Turkey (1994-97) who became the third highest-ranking official at the State Department. He received money from foreign governments in exchange for U.S. classified information. He was aided by Air Force Major Douglas Dickerson who ended up working under Douglas Feith (Donald Rumsfeld's Pentagon). The information went primarily to Turkey and Israel.
Congressmembers engaged in illegally supplying classified (secret) information. The top source was the hyper-Zionist, Democrat, Tom Lantos. Lantos gave the documents to Alan Makovsky (his assistant and now of the Washington Institute for Near Eastern Policy — Zionist) who passed it on to Dr. Sabri Sayari, Georgetown University (a major "intelligence"/foreign affairs university) who then passed it on to AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) a supposed lobby but that is definitely an organization acting as the agent of a foreign government with extremely close connections with the Mossad.
Israel is notorious for spying inside the U.S. government.
What Israel and Turkey didn't use would sometimes be offered to Pakistan's ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence; Pakistan's CIA).
Richard Perle and Douglas Feith (both hyper-Zionists) were deeply embedded in the George W. Bush neocon administration. Sibel says Perle and Feith:
...had a list of individuals in the Pentagon broken down by access to certain types of information. Some of them would be policy related, some of them would be weapons-technology related, some of them would be nuclear-related. Perle and Feith would provide the names of those Americans, officials in the Pentagon, to Grossman, together with highly sensitive personal information: this person is a closet gay; this person has a chronic gambling issue; this person is an alcoholic. The files on the American targets would contain things like the size of their mortgages or whether they were going through divorces. One Air Force major I remember was going through a really nasty divorce and a child custody fight. They detailed all different kinds of vulnerabilities.
Tom's commentary: Now, that's nasty and typical of the whole dirty imperialistic system. This sort of dirty-tricks business has been going on for as long as I can remember. Back during the George H. W. Bush administration, there was strong evidence of at least one house in the Washington, D.C. area dedicated expressly to record high-ranking officials in compromising positions even with minors of the same sex in order that they could be blackmailed. The revelation was so explosive that people firmly believe (with much evidence in support) that a number of people were murdered by the government to shut them up. Much of the scandal that ended up being covered up and flushed down the memory hole refers to the Franklin Pedophile case and Monarch Mind-Control experiments by the CIA, which experiments have been thoroughly documented and are confirmed via CIA documents release under the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) and also as a result of the Church Committee hearing in the U.S. Senate.
Monarch was, and is, cess. It is the single-most depraved aspect of the United States. It is directly tied into mad-scientist Satanism. Nazis scientists were imported into the U.S. where they were encouraged to continue their utterly evil and sadistic, perverted experiments on untold numbers of helpless, terrorized and abused children. Some of the experimentation and then established practices involve (still) ritual abuse. You can learn more about it by studying the cover-up of the CIA Finders case.
When you research these things, you must learn how to stop following minds that continue on into pure imagination. It is often simply enough to reserve judgment concerning where and when the trail is faked for effect. It's a technique: seeding the field of truth with weeds. It's biblical. Jesus talked about it.
Sibel mentions that one of the entities whose employees were particularly targeted was the RAND Corporation.
RAND has been involved in intelligence games modeling since its inception. It was responsible for producing "intellectually" sounding cover for blatant imperialism.
Further according to Sibel, Marc Grossman also had journalists at The New York Times (NYT).
The NYT has long been considered, along with the Washington Post, to be a CIA front publication. That's not to say that the NYT and Washington Post never print facts. They have to have print partial-truths or the false propaganda would never be believed. It was the NYT that sold the world on the Iraq War for neocon Vice President Dick Cheney via Scooter Libby, Cheney's Zionist Chief of Staff. There are plenty of Zionists at the NYT. It was the NYT that dutifully printed what Libby fed it that the White House then pointed to as evidence. It's in The New York Times afterall.
Sibel said that Henry Kissinger, James Baker, and Brent Scowcroft are all implicated in illegally supplying Turkey with American secrets. Exactly how directly or deeply remains to be seen. Paul Wolfowitz was also involved.
Four months before 9/11, Feith, Wolfowitz, and Perle were discussing with the Turks how Iraq would be divided up. Turkey wanted to control Kurdistan in Northern Iraq.
Feith and Perle were gaining via business favors rather than cash. They were trading in secret nuclear technology, nuclear-weapons technology, and conventional-weapons technology. Perhaps others were involved in this illegal transfer of secret, technological information, but the article isn't exactly clear on that.
Brent Scowcroft (chairman of the American Turkish Council), James Baker, Richard Armitage (another neocon member of PNAC; Project for the New American Century), and Marc Grossman were also negotiating with the Turks via a separate track or channel.
Tom's commentary: Their group was not dominated by Zionists. Brent Scowcroft was for invasion provided he'd make more money from it via Turkey. George W. Bush though was more in bed with or playing the Zionists then his father had been. George H. W. Bush was always more Anglo oriented than Jewish. George W. was playing the "conservative," fundamentalist Zionist-Christians for the fool. Karl Rove and Bush would have a good laugh after their Christian-Zionist visitors had left the Oval Office. Along with outright rigging of the elections, George W. won by suckering those following the "Fundamentalist" leaders.
Sibel goes on to explain that Marc Grossman saw to it that students of Turkish extraction were placed as graduate students and professors with access to Sandia or Los Alamos (nuclear research and development laboratories). Those students and professors would be paid for secrets that would be resold to Saudis in Detroit, Michigan.
Tom's commentary: Dearborn, Michigan, has the largest Arab population in America. Why that is exactly might be because of Detroit's close proximity to Canada and easy access via the tunnel under the Detroit River and also via bridge. When I was child in Detroit, we would drive over to Canada without having to show any I.D. Were we're simply asked what states we were born in. It was harder getting into California (fruit inspections) than Canada.
Sibel says that Republican Congressmen were heavily involved too, especially Bob Livingston, Dan Burton, and then House Speaker Dennis Hastert. Certain agents in the FBI wanted to go after all of these people but were thwarted by the Clinton administration and then the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The FBI continued probing in Chicago though.
Democratic Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky was targeted by the Turks who compromised her with a Turkish female spy who seduced the bi-sexual and married Schakowsky. Schakowsky's townhouse had been bugged with cameras and microphones to capture the sex acts to later blackmail her.
The U.S. government was sending "bin Ladens" into former Soviet Republics. These bin Ladens were funded, armed, and trained. They were flown on NATO aircraft. Those planes were also used to transport drugs to Belgium.
Tom's commentary: It's how poppies in Afghanistan turns into heroin that flows through NATO Turkey and on into NATO Europe where addicts help fund the evil Empire whose top bankers launder all the money via their Rothschild dominated BIS (Bank for International Settlements, International Organization for the cooperation of Central Banks) that then Secretary of the U.S. Treasury Henry Morgenthau had tried to liquidate ("liquidation of the Bank for International Settlements at the earliest possible moment"); but Franklin Roosevelt died in office, and Vice President Harry Truman, upon assuming the office of the Presidency, cancelled the plan.
Chase Bank's Dean Atchison had been instrumental in arguing against dissolution. It is interesting to note that Chase Bank in New York (Rockefellers) was heavily implicated in Nazi banking ().
The heroin doesn't all stay in Europe. According to Sibel:
After that, they went to the UK, and a lot came to the U.S. via military planes to distribution centers in Chicago and Paterson, New Jersey. Turkish diplomats who would never be searched were coming with suitcases of heroin.
Tom's commentary: It's one of the reasons for diplomatic Passports. The commoners are told other, "nicer" reasons.
The international bankers were/are a "good-old-boy" supranational organization where national loyalties take a back seat to making profits. National Empires are mere tools at that level.
...even during Obama's presidential campaign, I did not buy into his slogan of "change" being promoted by the media and, unfortunately, by the naÃ¯ve blogosphere. First of all, Obama's record as a senator, short as it was, spoke clearly. For all those changes that he was promising, he had done nothing. In fact, he had taken the opposite position, whether it was regarding the NSA's wiretapping or the issue of national-security whistleblowers. We whistleblowers had written to his Senate office. He never responded, even though he was on the relevant committees.
As soon as Obama became president, he showed us that the State Secrets Privilege was going to continue to be a tool of choice. It's an arcane executive privilege to cover up wrongdoing—in many cases, criminal activities. And the Obama administration has not only defended using the State Secrets Privilege, it has been trying to take it even further than the previous terrible administration by maintaining that the U.S. government has sovereign immunity.
Tom's commentary: I didn't buy his change-agent message either. He was a transparent as could be. He was in the hip pocket of the superrich bankers on Wall Street who have promised to make him a multi-multi-millionaire — just as they did with the poor kid "Bill Clinton."
Sibel said that Mayor Richard Daley was also implicated.
Sibel wants us to remember that Barack Obama comes out of politics in Chicago. His Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, is also a product of Wall Street.
There is a definite spider web that Sibel managed to see and hear for a little while. We can all see the results though what with all the fighting, drug trafficking, lying, cheating, stealing, torturing, assassinating, etc., going on all around.
We know them by their rotten fruits from their rotten branch from their rotten trunk and rotten root (evil hearts).
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)