UPDATE Thursday, December 03, 2009: I had told Google Blog Search that if they stopped censoring me, I'd say so on this Blog. As of this "UPDATE," Google Blog Search is now showing 1,967 posts as indexed and linked. () That's up again from only 4 at one point. Therefore, I'm adding this update.
1,967 is not all of the posts, but it seems that perhaps they are slowly re-indexing the site. I give them the benefit of the doubt. I haven't looked to see if they are avoiding "controversial" posts.
This site was listed in Google's blog searching not too long ago (several months). Once I started writing more posts about how homosexuality is a choice and that it is harmful, once I started pointing out the errors of the top proponents of homosexuality, once I started tying it all together with the evil Satanism that is Theosophy, etc., more and more of my posts started being blocked and disappearing.
Last year, I had thousands of posts that showed up via.
As of Wednesday, September 30, 2009, I have just three remaining with the latest date now as "8 May 2009." Why do they even bother to show those three?
Look at the posts I've done since May 8, 2009. You'll see that as I revved up truth-telling, Google clamped down with their predatory claws.
Check out all the posts I've done where I've mentioned "homosexuality" and homosexuals."
Now, you need to know that homosexuality is a choice and that it is always harmful. "Homosexuals: What they ignore."
When I wrote that Jesus was/is a communist but not a Marxist Communist but rather promoting the spirit that brought forth the communism in the Book of Acts (and I've written plenty on it), Google didn't censor me.
When I wrote that Jesus was/is a total pacifist who never called down wrath, never promoted human-on-human violence or coercing souls into righteous behavior (and I've written plenty on that too), Google didn't censor me.
Right when I started writing more powerful and convincing and scripturally logical posts about how Jesus was/is opposed to the perversion that is homosexuality and tying it all together with "The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful" - Isaiah 32:5, then Google started censoring me.
You figure it out. What kind of liberal and/or conservative is Google?
As I've written, Buddhism, Deism, Freemasonry, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism (Talmudic), Mormonism, Paganism, Satanism, Scientism, Scientology, Theosophy, Wicca, Zionism, and more, all come into play here against Jesus's true teachings. This is not to say that aspects of these aren't good. They contain partial-truths, but we aren't to be satisfied with that. Whole truth is our goal. There are not many paths to it. There is but one, and it's narrow. There is no good reason for censoring me about this. There was no good reason for crucifying Jesus. It only had to happen because of evil.
I have shown on these pages how it is impossible to conclude that Jesus promoted, supported, or condoned homosexuality. I have shown how all are mistaken who claim scripture does not show that Jesus is anti-homosexuality.
And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away? He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so. And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. (Matthew 19:4-9 KJVR)
Yet, we have the Episcopal Church and many others now claiming that it isn't so. They claim to be Christians but spit in Jesus's face, calling him a liar. We have an "openly homosexual" Episcopal bishop who divorced his wife to marry a man. That so-called church (Episcopal) then dares to say the act of their bishop was and is consistent with Jesus's teachings on the matter. It's insane! That church listened to the devil speaking through and working through, Alfred Kinsey. (ALFRED KINSEY REPORTS: SEXUAL-REVOLUTION DEVOLUTION, GNOSTICISM, MYSTERY RELIGIONS, FREEMASONRY, FOUNDING FATHERS)
Google doesn't like it that I write that. Well, too bad for Google. They're going down and not on account of any curse I put on them. I curse no one. I only warn what happens to those souls that cling to Satanism.
Google was founded to chase mammon, not to bring forth the Christian Commons but to line the pockets of its founders, who were not, and are not yet, interested in Christlikeness (the giving and sharing political economy even enhanced way beyond Acts; total pacifism; and sexual harmlessness and truth, not the selfish, harmful lie that is the choice of homosexuality). No one has to be a homosexual. That's a fact. That's real knowledge whether Google likes it or not. The behavior (homosexuality) itself re-structures brain matter. It is on the path to greater and greater error.
Google works with (falsely profits) fascists all around the world. It compromises everywhere. It was never held to account for working with the Chinese Communist Party that definitely still dictates in China, contrary to what the people if given real, informed choice would choose.
Google's motto, Google's slogan, was/is "Do no evil." It would be good were they to even attempt to live up to it.
Greed is evil, yet the founders of Google have multibillions while others starve. Violence is evil, yet the founders of Google will censor me but not those promoting war. Those founders do not officially answer those people supporting war. Google does not take a firm and constant stand against greed and war. They can not while becoming astronomically rich in the evil mammon.
As I've stated. Homosexuality is evil. There is no doubt about it. Absolutely nothing any human being can say or write or do can ever alter that fact. Yet, Google censors me for saying it.
Oh well, Google is the most used search engine on the face of the Earth for now. At the time Google came into being, the people chose to use it rather than standing with the other search engines that were not selling popularity. Than the other engines either folded or copied Google. Evil prevails for a while.
What possessed the founders of Google to allow their minds to wander to "hey, I know how we can become rich"? Where did they get the seed money to buy the 6 thousand original desktop computers they networked together to start processing searches? Why wasn't that same energy and money pumped into open, non-profit efforts that would equally benefit all?
Now, I've used Google. I want mammon coming into the Christian Commons to be translated into the enhancement of Acts communism and not for selfish reasons. First comes love. Looking for recompense does not come first!
My vision isn't the vision of the founders of Google. My vision is organic farmland lived on and worked by real Christians bringing forth food for all at no charge.
Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price. (Isaiah 55:1 KJVR)
I went into the center of the world following Jesus's example of going into the center of Jerusalem. He took donations also to translate. So, to speak with people, to reach people, I used Google. This was not hypocrisy. It is impossible to communicate with lost souls without doing things like that — going where they are.
Google though doesn't want me to succeed. They want me to fail. Hence the fact that they removed the thousands of posts from their blog search. They still have all the data. They're just blocking it from those who search on terms. They don't want people to see what I've written because when what I want for the world happens comes to pass, there will be no Googles because there will be no greed and selfishness. There will be no war, and there will be no harmful sex, which means no homosex.
Google apparently thinks that this world is all there is, that their fleshly life is all there is. They are wrong. There is God. They don't know God. They do evil.
I ask them to repent. They need to lift their efforts to block the truth that homosexuality is a choice and harmful, always. They need to lift their efforts to block the truth that Jesus never has been accepting of homosexuality but only not coercive and violent against those who dig their own pit and fall in, who refuse to hear and heed.
- If they aren't greedy, they are warmongers or homosexuals.
- If they aren't warmongers, they are greedy or homosexuals.
- If they aren't homosexuals, they are greedy or warmongers.
- Very, very many (and the evil disease is spreading due to a lack of inner vigilance and due to people allowing themselves to be duped) are all three in one: homosexual, greedy, warmongers.
Where are the souls who are not any of the three: homosexuals, greedy, warmongers?
Such souls must conflate. Only then is there a Church known to itself being of more than one human on the Earth.
If you agree, then to help compensate for Google's censoring us, link to this site. Write about it in positive terms. Let me know you agree via your comments.
If we don't come together by the Holy Spirit — the conflating spirit, we will not be able to magnify the light enough to save lost souls. The light of darkness that is of homosexuality, greed, and war will shroud the lost in the spirit of death.
Don't shrink away. Don't be a coward. Stand up. Don't be intimidated by Google or any huge, multinational, capitalist, greedy, violent, depraved corporation taking over and taking over and taking over the Earth. They don't win in the end, thank God.
Sergey Brin, one of the two founders of Google, according to the Wikipedia article about him (that Google certainly has monitored and would more than tweak if it didn't start out portraying Brin as a creature of the light), claims that Sergey Brin is the following (based upon an article about him in the Economist magazine):
...an "Enlightenment Man," and someone who believes that "knowledge is always good, and certainly always better than ignorance," a philosophy which is summed up by Google's motto of making all the world's information "universally accessible and useful" and "Don't be evil."
So, what is this site? Brin and his company want the world to believe that this site renders no "knowledge." I have no knowledge of God. Is that what they are saying? The things I've written on this site are unworthy of still being listed in Google blog-search results. That is what they said by virtue of banning my posts from those results.
Brin's company is not enlightened. If he were enlightened, he'd be helping me rather than working to ban me and working to harm the cause of the Christian Commons.
This is what he said to Fortune Magazine:
We felt that by participating there, and making our services more available, even if not to the 100 percent that we ideally would like, that it will be better for Chinese web users, because ultimately they would get more information, though not quite all of it.
Well, I'm not in China. Yet, this blog is no longer being allowed to show in Google's blog-search results with the exception of 3 posts as of the date of this post. How does Brin rationalize that? Where's the "100 percent" of which he spoke to Fortune?
Look, I have no problem with censorship. I don't have xxx pornography on this site or anywhere. That stuff is the result of sexual confusion and leads to addictions that devour the soul. That said, there is nothing on this site that I promote that leads to confusion and addictions that devour the soul. It's just the opposite. Yet, Brin's company censors this site, as have many others, while Google allows xxx pornography so Brin can make more money. It's that simple.
Technology is an inherent democratizer. Because of the evolution of hardware and software, you're able to scale up almost anything. It means that in our lifetime everyone may have tools of equal power.
That's completely wrong, Brin. Those who are now in control will never allow equal power. You may have it only if you have the money to pay for it and aren't assassinated by greedy competitors.
So, there you have it. What are you going to do? What you do determines where you'll end up.
Just mouthing that you believe in Jesus won't do a thing if you don't behave in accordance with truth. The grace of God won't save those who just pay lip service or who condone homosexuality or war or greed. This is how it is.
At the time of posting this article, Google ads are still showing on this site. Their right hand censors me while their left hand pays me. I started using Google AdSense before I knew about Google censoring truth. I started before Google went along with the dictator of China. Google AdSense doesn't make a payment until the site "earns" $100. Right now, this site is at $80 and change. It's taken years to get to that $80. What should I do? Should I take down the AdSense ads and let Google keep the $80, or should I hold out until the site reaches the $100? Google has already been paid by the advertisers, but it will lose out on all the impressions and earnings in the future if I take down the ads. I also have Google site search with AdSense installed. Should I take it down too? If I do, it won't be out of a spirit of vindictiveness. It will simply be because the Holy Spirit says Google isn't repenting. I've asked Google why they are censoring me. They refused to answer. They refused to discuss it. They claim it's all automated and they don't censor. Well, they are their algorithms. Their filtering reflects their hearts. They can't talk or write their way around that.
They hate the Christian Commons, or they'd have been promoting it rather than censoring me.
You will find that Google web search also now censoring this site although not as severely yet as with Google's blog searching.
God bless Google and Sergey Brin and Larry Page with the truth. May they see the real light and repent before it becomes to late for them in this life.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)