OBAMA IS SUCH A LIAR ABOUT IRAN AND MANY OTHER THINGS

UPDATE Thursday, December 03, 2009: I had told Google Blog Search that if they stopped censoring me, I'd say so on this Blog. As of this "UPDATE," Google Blog Search is now showing 1,967 posts as indexed and linked. () That's up again from only 4 at one point. Therefore, I'm adding this update.

1,967 is not all of the posts, but it seems that perhaps they are slowly re-indexing the site. I give them the benefit of the doubt. I haven't looked to see if they are avoiding "controversial" posts.


Iran did not have to tell anyone about the site it constructed until six months before going into operation. Barack Obama though goes around bearing false witness saying of Iran that it has shown a "disturbing pattern of...evasion." That's a flat out lie. Iran has cooperated with the IAEA. Barack Obama has not one single bit of evidence against Iran. He's a liar.

If Obama puts harsh sanctions on Iran and a child dies, if he attacks Iran or lets Israel do it, he'll lose.

Look Obama, you liar, Iran has every right that the U.S. or Israel has to nuclear energy. You need to back off and hold your peace.

The leaders of Iran do not, repeat, do not want to attack Israel with nuclear weapons. Neither do they want to, nor would they, supply "terrorists" with nuclear devices.

It appears quite clear that you want hegemony over the planet and are afraid that if Iran were to obtain nuclear weapons that the U.S. and the Anglo-American-Israeli Empire would not be able to end up fracturing Iran — divide and conquer and rule Iran for its resources to plunder.

You are up to no good as ordered by your greedy masters who put you in the White House.

I hate it when people lie to take nations to war. God hates it too, Barack. You call yourself a Christian. You're a liar. Christians don't use violence on others. They don't order people to attack others. You're no Christian. You belong to Satan.

You shield the evil thieves on Wall Street. You're shielding Bush and Cheney and that whole crew of fascists. I'm not for stringing them up, but I'm for having the truth told officially by real government, not the farce you're heading up.

You want more spying. You want to shuffle around prisoners without giving them due process. You want more troops to invade Afghanistan to murder the innocent along with the guilty. You want more predator drones to commit your war crimes, your genocide, your crimes against humanity. God is watching you. He sees every last thing you do in all your secret rooms. You don't have bug scanners to stop him, Obama. You never will. There is nothing humans will ever produce that will block God from seeing all, hearing all, knowing all.

You're being led by Satan right into the trap of your own making. You're digging your own pit just as Bush did before you.

Are you a Freemason? If so, which lodge do you belong to and what degree are you?

It was Iran that voluntarily informed the world of the facility. It didn't have to, because reportedly, Iran didn't sign that part of the protocol. It didn't ever bind itself to it. Nevertheless, Iran chose to disclose. What did it get for doing that? It was dumped upon by the lying Barack Obama.

Scott Ritter wrote a "nice" piece about Obama's lies. He mentioned that Gordon Brown and Nicolas Sarkozy are right there with Obama (lying).

Keeping Iran honest: Iran's secret nuclear plant will spark a new round of IAEA inspections and lead to a period of even greater transparency

Then we have: "Israel says the disclosure that Iran is building a second nuclear enrichment facility proves it 'wants to equip itself with nuclear weapons'." That's plain dumb. It doesn't prove it. Only an idiot would say it proves it. You know who the idiot is? The fascist Avigdor Lieberman is the answer.

That article contradicts Scott Ritter's a bit. We'll see who turns out to have been correct about the legal details. I don't agree with all things Scott Ritter. He's not anti-war all the time. He is though vastly more sane than is Avigdor Lie-berman.

Obama doesn't do much about what matters. He's sitting on his hands while entrapment is used against untold numbers of people. He's sitting on his hands while agents provocateur cause problems at demonstrations so the sadists in the police state can crack heads. Obama is sitting on hands rather than investigating 9/11 and the Oklahoma bombing where it has long been known that other bombs went off inside the building, just the way we know that the FBI gave the explosives to the bombers of the first World Trade Center bombing.

Entrapment and provoking should be illegal. They certainly are immoral.

The fact of the matter is that the United States is a trouble maker. It is a trouble maker on all levels, international right down to the city police, county sheriffs, and highway patrols, etc.

Not all law-enforcement agents are out to do the bidding of the dark side at the top, but many are. It's all too apparent.

Everyone in the know realizes that the Satanic spirit is leading this planet with the U.S. in the lead in that regard. The only thing exceptional about the U.S. is it huge pride that will be its death. The U.S. has just been more willing to fool itself, to rationalize — stealing from the poor of world.

What has Obama done after telling Israel to stop building colonies and Israel thumbing its nose at him? Nothing is the answer.

What has Obama done about the coup in Honduras? He's let Brazil do the heavy lifting. If he had any courage, he'd send the Marines to fetch Zelaya to the U.S. Embassy to stay as long as needed while the U.S. pulls all funding for the Honduran military and even pulls out completely (if need be; it is).

That's a mundane answer and no final answer at all. What we need are universal repentance and world understanding about the real message of Jesus. We don't need the evil, Satanic, Luciferian lies of Theosophists who are censoring this site. (Censor this too, Google Blog Search.)

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.