WILLIAM HENRY: TURN GEORGE WASHINGTON INTO DEMIGOD, CALL PEOPLE TO PRAY TOWARD WASHINGTON, WORSHIP AMERICAN SYSTEM

William Henry is one of the persons upon whose "work" Dan Brown has based his most recently released book, The Lost Symbol.

That's only part 1 of a 10-part interview series with George Noory of Coast to Coast AM (http://www.coasttocoastam.com/guest/henry-william/5629).

Here are the other 9 parts on YouTube:

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2009/09/22

William Henry is trying to turn George Washington into a real demigod and is calling upon people to pray toward Washington, D.C. and to worship the American system. He's trying to create America as a religion where Presidents are deified the way the Romans deified their Caesars. This is exactly what I said was going on in the background, in the secret rooms. They are trying to externalize their once secret desires. This is blasphemy. This is humanistic blasphemy. It is exactly what Jesus fought against with the Roman Empire.

William Henry is leading many people astray. He's leading them down the dead-end road of the Mystery Religion schools. He's further Hellenizing America. He does it while talking Jesus and citing Christian scripture. He does it while doing exactly what Jesus said not to do, which is syncretize. He's doing it in a way where he speaks two different trains at the same time where it is blatantly obvious that he doesn't believe the things to which he's leading others. He's hedging in quickly worded and unquestioned ways.

People are being pulled psychologically, scientifically, to conclusions that are founded upon atheistic humanism. William Henry knows this.

What will happen is that all those who go down that path will fall short of the highest calling put forth by Jesus. The Hindus don't like it, but their religion is not on the same level. It does not lead inevitably to Christian Communism and to the miracle healing as shown by God through Jesus Christ. The same can be said of Buddha and Mohammed. They just don't measure up no matter how much more they knew than the common people around them at their times.

There are parallel ideas and concepts, but it isn't where the religions are the same that matters. It's what set Jesus's teaching and example as new and best that matters. We cannot settle for less, or we'll not make it.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.