This is a must-watch. It sums up much of what others and I have been saying and writing for years.

There is no doubt that the Neocons are evil. The video could only cover so much in a little over an hour and a half. It didn't touch upon the Zionist connection. It mentioned the British but not as a part of the Anglo-American-Israeli Empire. The information on the false-flag operations was very truncated and failed to mention Israel's attack on the U.S.S Liberty with President Johnson's full knowledge.

In addition, the film should have mentioned that the U.S. Military allowed a huge convoy to leave Afghanistan and also airlifted many Pashtuns to Pakistan all the while claiming that the U.S. was going to box in those same people. The U.S. deliberately left the Southern exit wide open to insure a long war.

I think the documentary did an exceptionally good job of exposing Halliburton destroying and wasting intentionally to drive up the costs so that they could claim a larger percentage as pure profit off the American taxpayer. Those profits are the "plus" portion of what is referred to as their cost-plus contract. The "plus" is a percentage of the cost, so the higher the cost via destroying and wasting, the higher the profit.

Do you think the Republicans who want to de-fund ACORN would stop all governmental contracts with Halliburton and other such corporate rip-off artists?

As for the $2.3 Trillion that went missing from the Pentagon, the announcement about that came immediately before 9/11 and was then completely overshadowed by that 9/11 "news" event.

Now, the U.S. went to war based upon a false-flag operation. The facts are there. Many, many brave airline pilots, architects, construction engineers, building-demolition experts and others have come forward to say that there is no way that the official governmental explanations for 9/11 are true. There has been a cover-up. There is no doubt about it.

The U.S. went to war for oil, gas, and pipelines for the personal, private wealth, power, and control of extremely evil men and their heirs who constitute a big portion of the coming global plutocracy.

The same thing that happened for the oil, gas, pipeline, and military contracts has been repeated for the finance capitalists on Wall Street only by orders of magnitude more. The financial meltdown was also completely staged for the sakes of previously strategically placed superrich individuals who don't give a damn about others whom they consider stupid for not being ruthless, greedy, violent, and willing to take whatever and create a military twofold more the child of hell than [them]selves if that's possible.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.