This is my reply to Morris's comment over on his post: "Muslims should thank the Jews for making them attractive."
I put it here to increase exposure of the concepts involved.
Morris lives in England, east of London I believe. He's in his mid-50's and is of Jewish extraction. Morris has a keen interest in how chemicals introduced into our bodies and general environment have altered hormonal balances, etc., that he correctly believes is contributing to a rise in homosexual and other aberrant behaviors. Most of us will be familiar with the news reports about huge numbers of inter-sexed fish never before seen in Chesapeake Bay for instance. It's just the tip of the iceberg. In addition, Morris did a video interview of an ultra-orthodox Neturei Karta rabbi who discusses how the Judaism of the Zionists is not Biblically well-founded at all. You may see Morris's video uploads and favorites over on YouTube.
You might want to watch this one in particular to start with if Google's YouTube hasn't censored it. It's not working as of the time stamp of this post. Google is part of the Homosexual/Zionist Movement in case you were unaware of that. Post: GOOGLE CENSORING THIS SITE: TRUTH, AMONG OTHER TRUTHS, THAT HOMOSEX IS A CHOICE, ALWAYS HARMFUL, AND ANTICHRIST
While the homosexuals used to decry how they weren't allowed to be themselves, they now work furiously to prevent others from being able to speak about the subject. They have their superrich banksters pulling levers behind the curtain. It's as obvious as obvious can be. It's called cause and effect. It's called knowing them by their fruit or results. We now have Barack Obama, hand-picked by the Bilderberg and other plutocrats, giving a major speech to the homosexuals saying that homosexuality is just as worthy as heterosexuality. Well it is not worthy. It is coming out from the dark side. Those homosexuals will find out that they are serving in ensnaring themselves in a trap of their own devising.
Morris placed that video as a "Video Response" to another video condemning Sally Kern's comments about the danger of the homosexual agenda on America. Now, Morris is over in the U.K., and I'm not a conservative, Republican, self-styled evangelical Christian, so Morris and I come at Sally Kern's remarks not from the typical ideology that the activist homosexuals love to use as if it's the only one opposed to homosexuality. Sally Kern is a state representative in Oklahoma. You can see the pro-homo video (and many others) denouncing her on YouTube.
Here's the one in question:
I don't know all of Sally's politics, but I would be hugely surprised if she agreed with me concerning true Christianity. Nevertheless, let me briefly sort out some of the errors in the various videos made against her position.
First, a representative does not necessarily represent all the people of a district in the manner suggested in some of the videos. She represents those who voted her into office. It is up to her once she's in as to the manner and degree to which she'll compromise on issues, etc. If she loses the next election on account of those who are pro-homosexuality "rights" having voted her out and voted in a homosexual, then those who voted for her will not have their views furthered in the state legislature for that district. That's the way it works. Would it suddenly become okay with the homosexuals that the anti-homosexuals don't have representation? The mundane system is inherently flawed. It's competitive. This is a huge subject that I won't attempt to cover more here.
Second, there is no doubt whatsoever that "sex education" contains those who are advocating for introducing ideas to the very young that many people believe are detrimental. Followers of Alfred Kinsey are extremely dangerous to the whole of society.
Here's a video that covers some of this: Secret History: Kinsey's Paedophiles . If that one doesn't work, try this: Watch what happens when the homosexuals become the fascists.
Third, the terrorism of the Oklahoma Federal Building and 9/11 was an inside job by those who are connected with both the Zionist and Homosexual Movements. Sally may not know that, but I do. Those at the very top of the inverted pyramid that will be turned right-side up and then leveled by this Second-Coming knowledge, know it too. That's why they are scrambling to censor and marginalize. They don't want an open and honest debate. Anyone who can't see that is hypnotized under the spell of those very movements.
Sally said that in her view, homosexuality is more corrosive to the social fabric and proper ordering of things than is the ostensible terrorist threat or Islam. Well, that belies some of her lack of fuller understanding, but she's not wrong that homosexuality is corrosive to the heterosexual family structure that should have been enhanced rather than further corroded by fracturing. Of course, fracturing is what Satan does.
Just look at the mind experiments conducted under contract by the U.S. Intelligence Agencies and Pentagon. They turned people into total vegetables and permanently destroyed their lives and memories of their histories with their loved ones just to learn how to do that on the microcosmic and then macrocosmic levels. Just look at the sick stuff the CIA had Donald Ewen Cameron and others doing to people:
- Operation Monarch, CIA Mind Control, depatterning, and psychic driving.
- CIA'S ROLE IN IRAN CONTINUED
- ASSASSINATION OF ROBERT F. KENNEDY WAS NOT ISLAMIC TERRORISM
- CHAPTER 100 THE SHADOW'S BIDDING: ASSASSINATIONS AND COUP DETATS: SUPPLEMENT: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CONSERVATIVE-REPUBLICAN CHRISTIAN: JESUS IS A SMALL-C COMMUNIST
- CHAPTER 8: EQUATING GOD AND COUNTRY: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CONSERVATIVE-REPUBLICAN CHRISTIAN: JESUS IS A SMALL-C COMMUNIST
- CHAPTER 2: CHRISTIAN CONSERVATISM: THE MOST SIGNIFICANT CONFUSION: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CONSERVATIVE-REPUBLICAN CHRISTIAN: JESUS IS A SMALL-C COMMUNIST
Do Internet searches on "Rita Zimmerman" "Linda MacDonald" "Ewen Cameron" ....
There is no polite way to put it. The multitude of Ewen Cameron types were and are monsters. They were and are demons from Hell. They were and are sociopaths in need of exorcism. Their brains are dominated not by the higher, most evolved, most enlightened parts but rather by the predator centers.
Then look at Abu Ghraib and all the secret prisons (dark sites, aptly named), etc. Then ask yourself if you believe that people sworn to secrecy and trained to lie (CIA) are telling the truth that they aren't engaged in any of this anymore and won't start up again. The pattern repeats and repeats and repeats. The only way to end it is to end the secret agencies altogether. Get rid of the Pentagon. Get rid of the war making. Get rid of the selfish system. Get rid of the harmful system. Get rid of the Central Banks around the world. Get rid of usury. Get rid of sexual selfishness and all selfishness from within you, everybody on the planet. That's the one and only way, and it's Jesus's, whether the Theosophists want to claim otherwise or not. They are completely wrong.
Now for my specific reply (perhaps too long for a comment reply to be placed on Morris's post page):
I believe, Morris, that there have been minds down through the ages and especially early that were certainly less distracted by all the racket of humanity. Reflecting was easier. Very early on, work wasn't required. Jesus alludes to this. Be fruitful, multiply, and kill and enslave each other was not what God said.
As for organized religion, it occurs to me that perfection and God are one and the same and perfection is perfectly organized. The incorruptible is not in disarray in the least. Therefore, we humans ought to be organized to the same end and in the same way. It is only the rebellious against what is truly best for one and all who over throw the peaceful garden. They are self-centered as opposed to being simultaneously one with the whole of humanity as one soul.
I understand that under the liberal interpretation of Sharia, Muslims do not force conversion. On account of ambiguity in the Qur'an though, there are dangerously aggressive and belligerent interpretations. There is also a higher taxation on other religions that is decidedly akin to protection money.
Now, I understand that one could argue that the "protection" racket includes then attacking those who won't pay, but once someone is outside the protection of Islam, he or she is fair game. Such is not the case in real Christianity. Frankly, it isn't directly allowed in Torah Judaism either. Membership does have its privileges though. The question is whether it is blood or spirit that is the deciding factor. In my book, they need to reconcile both blood and spirit for righteousness across-the-board.
The prevalent Talmudic is another matter though, as you've seen for yourself with hyper-racist "settlers" holding with a wicked Jewish fascism/nationalism that is hardly different in spirit from the Nazism of the "Aryan race." The racist rabbis behind that movement are covered over by the more cosmopolitan Zionists who know that such talk from those rabbis being widely exposed will turn the American cash-cow against the originally atheistic Zionist Project.
Isn't it amazing how so many Jews are killing their protector, America. What will they do when Russia, China, India, and the Arabs don't have to do what America and the European powers tell them anymore, Armageddon?
Sharia is coercive. Under that law, homosexuals are punished, often severely and even to the death; however under Christ, the law is written on the heart such that the individual refuses to engage in homosexuality on account of its unrighteous aspects - selfish; detrimental to both the individual and others. Under Jesus, one never resorts to wrathful violence on others. Jesus showed what will happen when wrath comes when he cleaned the temple, but hard-hearts can properly interpret that he was saying to do that within each heart so that it won't happen from without and worldwide.
There is no doubt that one could do worse than Sharia, and that in many ways, the decadence of the "Western" world is trying to probe the depths of depravity again as they did in ancient Canaan and elsewhere.
Aleister Crowley discussed in his writings how the eating of the flesh of ritualistically sacrificed innocent children imparted huge power to the devourer. Of course, he's speaking directly to those he wanted to convert to insanity that is called sociopathy (Satanistic).
Crowley and his Secret Societies crowd are much larger in number than the non-initiates and lower ranks are allowed to know.
The reason why the alarms of many calling themselves Christians are not sounding louder in the ears of the population in general is because many of those "Christians" cling to traditional hypocrisy. The histories of their denominations, the actual events of which they do not often repudiate, speaks to many who would follow after Freemasonry and other Luciferian (rebellious against the real enlightenment) offshoots. It speaks of how "Christianity" is riddled with inexplicable error. Rather than sorting out the diversion from Jesus Christ's walk on the part of co-opters who came later such as Constantine I, many simply want to through out Jesus's teachings and exemplary life altogether and start over. Why waste time though, since starting at the root cause of pain and suffering is exactly what Jesus calls souls to do already?
He clearly defines that this worldly world is upside down and that the pyramid needs to be leveled: First is last and all serve each and all, etc.
The only thing standing in the way is selfishness and the short-term and fleeting gain for self apart from the enhanced understanding of God (the God of Jesus) and at the direct negative expense of others who would otherwise be our real spiritual and fleshly brothers and sisters. I put homosexual behavior in that camp of selfishness regardless of how much they protest that some of their ranks "love" each other. That "love" comes bundled with damaging spirits or demons, if you will, and consequently is not pure love. "Homosexuals: What they ignore"
Lastly, alcohol can inflame if used to excess. If you look into wine though, you discover admirable qualities. To preclude it even in moderation is a call to not overcoming. It is akin to requiring women to cover head to toe. Only on account of allowing the devouring spirit to enter into the heart does the natural, non-sluttish; non-contrived, female form inflame men. In the manner of the words of Jesus, it wasn't always so.
We need to return to wisdom. This is what the Freemasons say too; however, their vision of what is wise is not one I share in whole. They believe that it is our destiny. Well, it is; but again, it is not wise to attempt to drag error into Heaven.
Thank you for the conversation between our two websites, Morris. I look forward to truly fruitful dialogue.
Peace, love, and truth,
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)