Yesterday at 12:14am on Facebook

Tom Usher
The obscene, thieving rich get richer off stealing from the poor and middle class until the masses get fed up and take it all back, plus. The superrich are playing with fire and are going to get burned if they don't turn around.

The Bail Out: US rich reap fortune amid foreclosures
Barack Obama has called on U.S. banks to return a favour to the American people. The President wants more lending to small businesses, in return for the hefty government bail out. But the average American is dismayed by the fat cats, once again, gorging on huge bonuses. Yesterday at 12:14am


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • Thomas James

      I am really tired of the Christian Right which loves telling everyone that the bankruptcy laws are written by liberals to protect deadbeats and they love to quote scripture that it is the evil man who borrows money and does not pay it back, and thou shalt not steal.

      While it is true that it is evil to borrow money and not pay it back what the right wingers don't tell you is that the bible commands that all debts to be released once every seven years. So what that means is that not only does every debtor go bankrupt but that there are no negative ramifications on any credit report so what this means that even after the debts are released the poor are entitled to additional credit at zero percent interest.

      The Christian right wingers love to say that the poor deserve to have their houses foreclosed on them if they miss any one of a series of 360 payments for a period of 30 years at exhorbitant interest rates. But what the right wingers don't tell you is that according to the bible the land is free and the longest possible loan for the construction of a house is a period of 6 years without any interest payments and even if you are so misfortunate to have to sell your house in order to pay a debt your house can be redeemed for free during the Jubilee year which is once every 50 years. But again all of this is pretty information that is found in the bible that the right wingers do not want you to know about yet they call themselves fundamentalist bible believing Christianswhen in actuality they hate the bible and everything it stands for if it gets in theway of their profits.

      • "...they hate the bible and everything it stands for if it gets in the way of their profits." Amen, and it does get in the way of all such profits if they will be honest.

        He's back!