I posted the following on the:
You know nothing about Christianity.
I addressed your comment below where I posted the following:
"The Fascists are trying to stop the Churches from feeding the poor. Take a stand for righteousness. Visit the site and leave a supportive comment as soon as you can. Don't let any religious differences stand in the way on this, please.
"I'm not a Methodist, but I stand with their feeding the poor. I stand against the Fascist, who don't give a damn about the poor or about you.
Yet you didn't even acknowledge your total ignorance in your reply:
"interseting? its strange, but once messhiach has come, no more war, hatred or killing, so yes, not only what is jesus doing but why is he even there? nothing has changed, we still have wars, still have hatred, still have poor, unfed people !! no, jesus is greek, for of zues, zues being the ancient roman god.........of war!!!!! sorry folks, but there we are . respect"
Where I answered you with the following:
"The post was in line with anti-Nazi tactics. You want to discuss Jesus. I see that as verging off topic, but I never shy away from people who make false claims about Christ.
"God came before, but there was no instant end to evil. Jesus is a spirit who lives within those who agree with him. He hasn't left.
"Also, Jesus is the Greek for Joshua, Yahoshua that is "God Saves." If Yah is Zeus (Deus; God), then only human understanding of God's real character has been flawed.
"Lastly, it was Mars who was the Roman god of war. Jupiter and Zeus were more in line. May I suggest to you that you are out of your depth.
"It's not over.
"May Jesus bless you with the whole truth.
and with this:
"English = Jesus
"Latin = Iesus
"Greek = Iesous
"Hebrew = Yesua, Yehosua, etc., from which the English derives Joshua which is also Jesus"
Now I tell you this. YHVH was a God of war in the Old Testament. In addition, it was Romans who smashed Israel, and those Romans worshipped Mars. Are you saying then that Mars was YHVH or that Mars was stronger than YHVH?
Why claim that Jesus was for war when he never called for it but rather for its opposite?
Jesus came and enhanced the law to put it above the standard of Moses. Moses and Joshua called for and committed genocide while Jesus never once called down the wrath.
In that day, saith the LORD of hosts, shall the nail that is fastened in the sure place be removed, and be cut down, and fall; and the burden that was upon it shall be cut off: for the LORD hath spoken it. (Isaiah 22:25)
He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken. (Isaiah 53:8)
Of course, the Gemara (2nd part of the Babylonian Talmud) lies about it by claiming, "before the death of Jesus this proclamation was made for forty days; but no defense could be found." The claimed "proclamation" from the Mishna (1st part of the Babylonian Talmud) was as follows: "whosoever knows any thing of this man's innocence, let him come and declare it." That's a lame contrivance.
The high priest then asked Jesus of his disciples, and of his doctrine. Jesus answered him, "I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing. Why askest thou me? ask them which heard me, what I have said unto them: behold, they know what I said." (John 18:19-21)
It was a kangaroo court consistent with the prophecy and why, among other reasons, Rome was allowed also under Satan to smash the wicked in Jerusalem. Who can't see it?
Now after I told you, you were wrong that Jesus means Zeus, you come saying the following again:
"i know where all this nazi hatred came from, from the death of a wandering rabbi called jesus. he thought and his few followers thought he was messhiach come to save the world from all the roman occupation, he even set one his followers up to hand him over to the authorities, this one named `judas`, poor misguided fellow. study this, the name jesus comes from the greek, `of zues`, who is zues? zues was the ancient greek and roman god of WAR, no less. if messhiach has come, why then is there war, killing, theiving, hatred and starvation still in the world. no messiach has not come yet...sorry folks and also messiach will not claim to be god, because there is only one god, non before him....just to clarify, not just a religious thing, but fact, just look around the world you`re in, stop dreaming of death and the next world, etc etc etc !!!! GET A LIFE AND STOP HATING, would be a good start."
Why do you spread such utterly ridiculous lies about Jesus? Have you ever even read the Gospels?
And Jesus said unto them, "See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down." (Matthew 24:2)
Wake up, Richard. Stop spreading lies. Jesus was talking about the Romans coming to Jerusalem to level the Temple, which they did. Not only that, but you're still claiming Zeus was the Roman god of war even though I've instructed you that he was not.
Where were you educated? You tell people here not to burn books, but it appears that you've read very few of them yourself, at least ones of any merit. Try reading the whole Bible before you spout what you believe is biblical prophecy. You are way off.
You are here to run down Nazis, but you're being an embarrassment.
By the way, if you keep this up, you're defining yourself as a troll. The Wikipedia defines it very well: "In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
If I post here and you add more such utterly ignorant and misleading comments incapable of being substantiated, I will delete those comments. Put up, or shut up is the common parlance.
The only way to be one with God is to be of the same spirit. If you don't understand that, it's not God's or Jesus's fault. You'll head the other way.
Lastly, have you never heard of the Second Coming of the same one, Jesus?
Peace and blessing of truth to everyone and to you too, Richard,
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)