Blair has zero evidence that Iran supplied or otherwise aided anti-imperialist fighters in Iraq.

"Tony Blair accused of spin over blaming Iraq War failures on Iran," by Sean Rayment. Jan 30, 2010.

Tony Blair has been accused of delivering a 'piece of spin' after claiming that Iran's support for insurgents almost caused the failure of the British-US mission in Iraq.

Even if Iran did do that, the U.S. and Britain had no right to attack and invade Iraq. The whole time Bush was in office, the Bush administration and the Zionists kept claiming they would produce evidence that Iran was supplying Iraqis. They never produced a thing. Each time they claimed to, they were embarrassed. They even replaced U.S. Marine General Peter Pace as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for, among other things, telling the truth that the U.S. had no hard evidence that Iran was supplying anyone in Iraq.

Blair is a blatant liar. He helped Bush start a war based on things that Blair knew full well were complete falsehoods on Bush and Blair's part. They are both war criminals. There's no doubt about it. He's still breaking the law by inciting more war crimes. He has zero evidence against Iran concerning any nuclear-weapons program on Iran's part. The whole world knows it too (at least those who could be bothered to look).

The mainstream media is controlled by, belongs to, lying, greedy, violent imperialists. They don't repeatedly call on Obama and Hillary Clinton and the rest of the liars to produce the evidence that Iran is building a nuclear-weapons program. They also don't harp demanding that Obama and Clinton and the other Zionists show how even if Iran were doing that, that Iran has any less "right" do be doing it than does any other nation-state in the world.

Iran can legally opt out of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NNPT) at any time. That's the deal they made with Iran. It's in writing and signed by all the parties.

As the title says, Tony Blair is pulling the Cheney: never admit you made a meaningful mistake, and never apologize for one. He's pressing on with the pattern of Big Lies with Obama and Clinton following right in his slippery footsteps. They will all fail in the end.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.