TWITTER-SESSION DIGEST, March 4, 2010

  1. TWITTER-SESSION DIGEST, March 2, 2010 http://ff.im/-gR3jp..... #

  2. Google Blog Search (GBS) is apparently censoring all indexed posts of mine with "homosexuality" or "Zionist" in the title. #

  3. I'm apparently not allowed to have a voice on those touchy subjects according to some homosexual/Zionist(s) at Google running Blog Search. #

  4. It's bad enough that people have to drill down to get to any of my indexed posts in Blog Search, without Google censoring some of them. #

  5. The posts are indexed though: #

  6. People complain about Google being censored in China while Americans are blocked from blog-search results on certain posts in the U.S. #

  7. Here I had thought they had lifted the censorship when they lifted the complete block on my blog that lasted months and ruined traffic. #

  8. TWITTER-SESSION DIGEST, March 2, 2010 http://ff.im/-gRafx..... #

  9. "CAP-AND-TRADE IS DEAD" FREE-MARKET CRONYISM SENATE AND TEA PARTY http://ff.im/-gU8RV..... #

  10. I'm now return-following http://twitter.com/Rogozin..... @Rogozin Dmitry Rogozin is Head of the Permanent Mission of Russia to NATO. #

  11. Israeli raid called off after Facebook leak #

  12. Israel silent despite Dubai call for Netanyahu arrest #

  13. What are the details of the backroom deal between Russia and the U.S.'s NATO for sanctions against Iran? #

  14. I'm still waiting to hear from Dmitry Medvedev what kind of sanctions won't hurt the Iranian people. #

  15. Brazil wants the world to think it didn't cave in under U.S. pressure or bribes. #

  16. It's part of Brazil's continuing bid for elevated global status & a slap at U.S. Latin American policy & intervention. #

  17. China is actually saber rattling by increasing its military spending. That's a way to increase U.S. concessions in any sanctions deal. #

  18. Avigdor Lieberman is telling the U.S. to do Cuban-style, unilateral sanctions against Iran. #

  19. The U.S. needs to declare peace with Iran instead of listening to Zionist-fascists like Avigdor Lieberman? #

  20. What were the "repeated and persistent violations" of the Iranian newspaper Etemad? Maybe the judiciary will overrule its banning. #

  21. Church that feeds needy faces court after neighbors complain http://www.usatoday.com/news/r.....less_N.htm Still? #

  22. Freedom of religion http://www.alliancedefensefund.....fault.aspx versus http://www.aclu.org/religion-b.....elief Well? #

  23. ACLU Defense of Religious Practice and Expression http://www.aclu.org/aclu-defen.....expression This is accurate. #

  24. By saying the ACLU is not mischaracterizing itself much if at all about "freedom of religion," I'm not saying I agree with the Constitution. #

  25. The U.S. Constitution attempts to be noncoercive concerning religion by avoiding a "state" religion but still sets up a coercive democracy. #

  26. The Alliance Defense Fund draws the line between Church and state in a different place than does the American Civil Liberties Union. #

  27. "...movement on policy is on what the banks have wanted. ...people...find it surprising that large banks still have that much power." Not I. #

  28. Banks don't have less power. They have more now than before the crash. That's why they caused it — to get more wealth, power, & control. #

  29. "Geithner insisted on an independent entity in his meeting with consumer advocates." What's he trying to do, redeem himself a bit or sucker? #

  30. Should the US Postal Service stop Saturday delivery? If they have to cut a day, why not make it Wednesday for homes. #

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.