ARE COLUMBIAN FASCISTS GUNNING DOWN JOURNALISTS AGAIN?

Clodomiro Castilla has reportedly been gunned down on his front porch in a suburb of Monteria in a shooting by perhaps two who fled on a motorcycle(s) (AP) who employed silencers (Latin American Herald Tribune) on their gun(s). Clodomiro Castilla was reportedly editor of the El Pulso del Tiempo magazine and a reporter for the La Voz de Monteria radio station in the Columbian north-western state/department of Cordoba.

Cordoba has been a fascist stronghold. Powerful fascist business-owners in Cordoba support the assassination of anti-fascist journalists.

Castilla had reported on "corruption and nepotism" of "local politicians" (The Earth Times) in Columbia's right-wing government.

Columbia has been the capital of the world for quite a while for assassinations of non-violent leftists, both journalists and union organizers. "More than 100 reporters were killed during the 1980s and 1990s by cocaine traffickers, rebels and paramilitaries." (Reuters via The Washington Post) Only the recent massacre of journalists in the Philippines has rivaled the U.S. so-called ally Columbia in murdering journalists. Of course, the cycle of violence comes from various sides. There can be no doubt, however, that the right-wing employs means against the common people designed to keep those people down and subservient for the selfish sakes of the anti-Christ, psychopathic/sociopathic elitists.

Castilla reportedly testified in court against President Alvaro Uribe's fascist political party on account of its direct links to right-wing death-squads.

The U.S. has been made famous for its El Salvador option, which is the creation, training, funding, and fomenting of right-wing death-squads.

The director of the Movement of Victims of State Crimes (MOVICE), Iván Cepeda, said Castille, throughout his career in journalism, "was an acid-tongued critic of local government and its ties to right-wing squads."

"Undoubtedly, his death was to silence the complaints and to destroy those who have argued in the department that those links have helped those who accumulate wealth and power," said the director of MOVICE.
...
In September 2006, President Álvaro Uribe in Colombia accused the correspondent of the American newspaper "El Nuevo Herald, Gonzalo Guillén, of having participated in writing the book" Loving Pablo, Hating Escobar, "whose author is one of the former intimate partners of drug kingpin Pablo Escobar.

The book highlighted the friendship between Escobar and Uribe, who also, according to the text, were old business partners. (teleSUR TV)

The U.S. rolled out the El Salvador option in Iraq when it conducted false-flag operations against the Shia (also spelled Shiite) and pinned it on the Sunnis. It also then created the Shiite death squads against the Sunnis after the pretext had been established. The Shiite leaders knew what was going on but gladly accepted the bribe money, arms, cover, and other means to assume control over the once Sunni-dominated society. The same pattern known as the El Salvador option, albeit in modified forms, is being rolled out in Afghanistan and even more so, Pakistan.

In every region of the world where there is a struggle between classes, one finds U.S. clandestine operations designed to destabilize the efforts of the common citizens to gain even a modicum of justice. Only in the "Whitest" nations has the U.S. avoided employing the El Salvador option outright even though the U.S. has utilized false-flag tactics, including on its own soil in the form of 9/11 and in conjunction with neocon aspects in other nations such as the U.K. and Israel.

The whole pattern underlies the "Worldwide Attack Matrix" for the sake of gaining "Full-Spectrum Dominance" {which is to include land (surface and underground), sea (surface and underwater), air, space and deep space military dominance and even total control of the electromagnetic spectrum in ways that will seemingly blur the line between the material and spiritual} and for the sake of gaining "Total Information Awareness" to "know" what everyone is thinking and will be thinking to control it, thereby rendering drones of the rest of human kind under the control of god-like, fascist elites - the seed of the banksters.

In other words, there are those within the Empire who are looking to create a state in which their designated heirs are as omni-gods and clearly in denial of God proper.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.