Thursday, April 29, 2010 reply to one "Will Byrd" on the Facebook group: Homosexuality (And what the Bible says about it.) http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=35007209399
You made a false statement that "There is not ONE VERSE of scripture to support your view that the Bible, God, Jesus or the Christian faith is against homosexuality." You ducked the direct refutation. If you are an honest person, why did you duck that? The rules of this group include no such ducking. Why did you join this group if you are only going to break the rules? It speaks volumes about you: your character right now. You need to turn and repent.
You accused me of being a homosexual because I'm anti-homosexuality, but you ducked it when I asked if I'm also a militarist or financial predator because I'm anti-war and anti-greed. Your reasoning is clearly in error and definitely misleading. That's why you're here: to mislead souls into darkness. Look in the mirror to see who and what you are right now. Change to righteousness, Will!
You made more false claims that everyone who is anti-homosexuality is enraged. I made clear that I'm not of the spirit of wrath. I don't call down the wrath. I ask that souls turn from the dark side. I am a pacifist and opposed to coercion, as Jesus was opposed to it. He cleaned the temple as a sign. The world is yet worshipping the proverbial Satan. Will you learn too late? Can you reconcile these things? I have.
You also obviously haven't taken the time to examine Noah's heart (the group's creator), not that you're capable in your present mentally diseased state. I mean that. You're showing serious mental/spiritual problems concerning which I would love nothing better for you that you ask, seek, and knock at Jesus's door to gain the healing power so that you may overcome, as so many others have and will continue to do so, yours truly included. Noah shows no signs of being full of rage that I've seen. I've seen more maturity of character coming out from him than from you by a long shot. You could learn from him in that department and doubtless many others but especially concerning looking at homosexuality from a point of truly wanting both to know and to understand the truth. Noah hasn't run from any of the "civilly" presented points of those who are pro-homosexuality.
You made the false statement that there is no such thing as an "ex" when on the contrary, there are many people openly testifying that they have personally changed. I have even linked to such testimony right here on this Wall. For instance: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89yH0uJRGDE Now, if you think that man is lying or stupid, I suggest you take it up with him. He'll dispel those ideas quickly if you're truly looking for truth about those two things. In addition, I suggest you read this: http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/october/6.48.html It's a very well thought-out article and plainly shows that "ex" is in the mainstream now to stay and to grow. This is not a blanket endorsement of all things "Christian Today" (magazine), so try to contain yourself from jumping to more false conclusions concerning me.
You have attempted to obfuscate by means of comments such as that I know this, that, or the other, that you are asserting is true when, in fact, I disagree and know you are flat-out wrong and have said so in no uncertain terms.
You've jumped to wild conclusions based upon a recklessly careless reading of my Facebook Profile – making the false accusation (actually accusing me to me of having "lied" – your word – about it on my profile) that I hold myself out to be an Episcopalian when I do not and have not.
You've claimed that the people at NARTH http://www.narth.com/ (National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality) are not respected by the highly educated professionals in human sexuality when many of the very people at NARTH are, in very fact, highly educated in human sexuality, are professional psychologists, and are respected by those who have not fallen for the lie that people can't change when it is obvious that people can and do change across the spectrum and concerning all manner of things (homosexuality being no exception). It is a behavior that anyone is free to stop if that one will just do that and stick with it, just as with giving up any other addiction or bad habit, etc. Not everyone quits addictions. That doesn't prove no one can. You have zero evidence that people cannot change while there are people right on Facebook and elsewhere testifying to the changes they've undergone.
You also stated falsely that "The "WE" here on this group is obviously YOU" [me] after which you were corrected but did not apologize for being incorrect and misleading (your pattern; your pathological problem showing through here in a way that no one, not even the most perverse, can deny within).
You have also more than suggested by way of questions that I've taken my cues from some across-the-board Fundamentalism. The fact is that Fundamentalism is yet divided in terms of many issues. It is not a monolith. That aside, I sat at the feet of no such Fundamentalists. I gathered my understanding directly as a result of asking and seeking and finally being moved by the Holy Spirit of Truth who has shown me that "conservative" and "liberal" are severely warped concepts in so-called modernity and real conservatism and real liberalism are one and the same. This is original with me from the Spirit, not to say that it hasn't occurred to others independently. I don't expect you to either understand or appreciate the semantics involved. Perhaps you'll dwell upon it though and ask and seek yourself – something sorely you are in need of doing: soul searching.
You have also made the false assumption that because I used the expression "the homosexual lifestyle" in terms of people having come out from it that, that necessarily means that I have avoided addressing changing "sexual orientation," a euphemism when used by homosexual proselytizers, of which you are clearly one. I have stated clearly that I know people have changed so that their very brain matter overcomes. Their brains transform from seeking sexual gratification via homosexual means. The brain is mutable. That's even becoming known in the mundane "sciences" because of people like me who are putting forth the ideas to examine. People become what they do. They become something else when they stop doing one thing and start doing another. This is not the only way change occurs, but it is nevertheless true. It is this indisputable fact of which you are mortified and desperate to censor.
You also falsely stated that no one else posts to the group. I explained that in some detail, but once again, you ignored that. There were plenty of posts and comments before I was even a member. Also, Noah has obviously posted here recently. In addition, the frequency of posts and comments in no way indicates correctness or incorrectness. You are engaging in fallacious reasoning designed, as apparently always with you, to mislead especially the youth along with the naive and/or gullible.
Will, you're an extremely misled, misleading, and immature person for your age. How old are you? You come across here as a hyper-teen, at best. Don't you think it's time for you to grow up?
Of course all of this is by way of your encouraging a complete lack of critical thinking. It puts me very much in mind of Likudnik and self-styled Christian Zionists.
The fact is that you have ducked every last point more so than anyone else yet with whom I've interacted on this group. You've added nothing here but the opportunity for me to expose your failing, deceiving, avoiding methods. You are in denial. That much is plainly certain. You really need to repent.
By the way, do you claim to profess God and Christ, or are you willing to admit that you are here as an atheist/agnostic anti-Christ? Perhaps you're a fan of Harry Hay, whom Barack Obama lauded even though Harry Hay openly said having sex with animals is fine if the animals don't mind. He also supported NAMBLA (the North American Man Boy Love [sex] Association). Is that you too? How far are you willing to go down into the cess, Will Byrd? If you are anti-bestiality and anti-pedophilia, why do they deserve fewer "rights" and "tolerance" than do homosexuals? Aren't they born that way too? Their genetics obviously allows them to slip into such behavior. Of course, as Jesus said, the flesh is weak. How are your spirits, Harry and Will?
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)