Disappointed "just a little bit" by the huge liar, Barack Obama: "Obama and Civil Liberties" | Mother Jones

Tom Usher wrote or added | "I am, fundamentally, an admirer of Barack Obama. I like his temperament, I like his worldview, and I like his management style. As I've said before, he has a habit of disappointing me just a little bit on an almost routine basis, but most of the time that doesn't interfere with my basic admiration. The one exception has been his attitude toward civil liberties and terrorism."

Holy Spirit, save us from these people who are disappointed "just a little bit" by the huge liar, Barack Obama, except for concerning "civil liberties and terrorism" where then the dots seem to connect (just a little bit).

Man, oh son of Man, "unlike Glenn [Greenwald], I'm [Kevin Drum] not a hardcore defender of civil liberties in every conceivable circumstance." Well, why don't you ask Glenn how he can envision a world in which hardcore defense of civil liberties can be consistent with addressing the grievances of the world's oppressed and poor such that terrorism against the Empire might not be an issue. I don't agree with everything Glenn Greenwald, but I know he's smart enough to understand that the civil liberties that are being destroyed by the neocon/neolib juggernaut are not mutually exclusive of a peaceful, safe, and secure world, quite the contrary.

Ye of little faith!

Thank you, Khmais [He had selected "like" on Facebook concerning my link and statement]. Palestine will be free. Real Jews will live in peace with Arabs with no evil oppression of anyone: The New Heaven and New Earth, my brother!

Khmais Bouguerra

You are welcome Tom ! I wonder when the world will understand that there has never been a problem between people from different faiths, whether jews, muslims, christians, boudhists, atheists or else ! There is no hate between them ! they have always lived in peace together and everywhere, like in my country tunisia, where many jews live , work and enjoy life ! The problem is zionism, imperialism, colonisation , war crimes and children and women massacres ! It's about inhumane treatment of humans, violation of elementary human rights ! I am sure that real, good jews don't support this !

I hope all this will stop, and all live in peace , cooperation and love !

I replied:

Much of the confusion comes from the question not only of self-defense but also of preemptive and so-called preventative attacks. The difference between the Old and New Testament shows this clearly. God in the Old Testament is held out as violently corrective – one God, God and Satan combined in many respects. God in the New Testament is held out by Jesus as being fed up with people misconstruing God's desires as those of the proverbial Satanic spirit. I go with Jesus on it.

The hyper-orthodox Talmudic Jews, especially in Israel but also in parts of New York, don't agree with Jesus but hate him. I do know that there are those who call themselves Muslims who appear to be willing not to force their religion on others. There are those though who insist on everyone living under their concept of sharia that is not in keeping with the pacifism of Jesus. Obviously there have been people calling themselves Christians down through the ages who are really Old Testament rather than New. All the Crusades, among many other actions, show that plainly. Many Buddhists and Hindus are total pacifists and non-coercive. Unfortunately, we see that some Buddhists have taken up arms on occasion, such as Tibetans, and many nationalist Indians espouse Hindutva that has often manifested mass violence against those of other faiths.

I know that of all these, Jesus alone has spoken to my heart. That threatens many in their minds, although it shouldn't unless they are confused about violence or greed or some other form of selfishness. Jesus's real thoughts alone threaten the Zionists and Imperialist Americans for that reason.

One day, the world will acknowledge Jesus as having done no wrong in his ministry but preached only what was and will remain beneficial in the most ultimate sense. If they had only listened, think of how the world would have been all this time.

I can't emphasize enough to the Palestinians, and especially Hamas, that the way of Jesus is the one and only path for them to throw off the extremely heavy yoke of the Zionists and Talmudists. The whole world will side with them if they renounce violence and simply ask for a complete redressing of their completely legitimate grievances against the Herzlites.

Peace to you, and thank you for your encouragement and input.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.