Why ask when you aren't interested in real answers? "Is a Giant Mosque at Ground Zero Justified?"

Tom Usher wrote or added | Before we do all that, let's have a thorough, real investigation concerning the who, what, where, when, and why of everything surrounding the crime of 9/11. Let's have real crime investigators with carte blanche check out everyone in the Bush administration concerning all the unanswered questions and with full powers to read every document anywhere in any archive with "national security" and "state secrets" being zero barriers to those independent investigators.

Let's also revisit the Goldstone Report in all its glorious truth-telling about the war crimes of the Zionists and then consider any Muslim sense of outrage and falling to violence, if they were even the master minds behind 9/11, which I seriously doubt. Let's not forget Sabra and Shatila. Let's not forget the Nakba.

Regardless, there has been a 9/11 cover-up. There was US and US-ally facilitation at the very least. We know the neocons were all over it ready with plans in hand to attack the predetermined so-called "Axis of Evil." It sounds like the same people who came up with the Nazi name "Homeland Security" came up with "Axis of Evil": all the "enemies of the Zionists.

This "rabbi" is insane. He's a hyper-Zionist, an Israel-Firster. By the way, Mohammed did say to "kill in the way of Allah." Of course there are plenty of God-twisting Zionist rabbis who tell the IDF to kill, kill, kill the inferiors.

This rabbi says to consult the victims' families. Well, consult the Jersey Girls who were blown off by the neocon Zionists in the Bush administration who stonewalled the 9/11 Commission that turned out to be a major farce.

Listen, there are family members of victims who think that nothing should have been built again on the spot. I know I wouldn't have built anything like what's going up.

This guy is just so utterly Zionist-centered that he can't get out of his own way.

Real Christians haven't forgotten that the Talmudists demanded that the Romans rid them of that meddlesome Jesus Christ. Those Talmudist have yet to repent of it. Maybe there should be no Talmudist synagogues anywhere near ground zero or anywhere else for that matter, or maybe this Zionist rabbi should stop with the false propaganda — lies.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.