Watch all 4 video's: German flotilla passengers speak out; Claire Short; George Galloway; and Usamah Hamdan (Hamas)


Tom Usher wrote or added | These German Freedom Flotilla passengers are credible.

Zionist aggression has backfired, as it had to and will again and again and again until they quit forever and give up the wicked, land-grabbing, racist, anti-God ideology that is the Zionism of Theodor Herzl and Ze'ev Jabatinsky, et al.

Betty Molchany: So far, Tom, it has not backfired. They are getting full support in the Congress and the Administration. They have hidden tapes, destroyed passenger's videos and computers, as they cut off lines of communication from the ships so that there could be no report of what was happening except some coverage by Al Jazeera.

Tom Usher

Well, Betty, I disagree for the reasons I've given before. Perhaps you'll get more out of hearing some different voices.

Claire Short nails it in this video (took the words right out of my mouth in many respects):

George Galloway also echoes much the same view in this speech in Tempe, Arizona:

I was thinking about your position, and I liken it to the abortion foe who says he or she can't require anti-abortion legislation. You are a pacifist but can't require Hamas to employ non-violence. Well, I don't coerce anyone to use non-violence. I just recommend it and defend it.

Speaking of Hamas, in the 2nd part of his interview with senior Hamas leader, Usamah Hamdan, Paul Jay brought out of Hamas's position that Hamas is open to the non-violent approach as a consideration. Fatah has attempted to adopt it in large measure, but Fatah is caving in on the two-state solution. However, Hamas wants Palestine back, pre-Zionist takeover. I believe the one-state option is the best of the mundane options.

Lastly, the White House (Barack Obama) is under immense pressure (more than at any other time in the history of the post-Truman Presidency) to not completely give in to the Zionists. He has already had to go along with Turkey in the Security Council much more than that to which the US is accustomed. NATO is going to be even more critical in the near term.

Watch how Israel will have to handle the Rachel Corrie with kid gloves and continually relax the siege, which won't appease Hamas or Turkey by the way, nor should it.

Hamas is going to have to take a page from Sinn Féin's book, but apparently, Hamas wants to hold out for more.

Are you so upset with the Zionists that you want to see them get their comeuppance by violent means? If so, I can't go along with you on that.

The reason why, one of many reasons why, Jesus's teachings resonate with me is because he made clear that by our own standards, no adult is undeserving of "punishment" and that it is hypocritical to call for evil, wrath, or whatever term you wish to apply here. Punishing the Zionists is what the Zionists have done to the Palestinians. As to the purity of the Palestinians, from God's perspective and from most of their own (the Muslims and Christians among them), they are not pure or perfect. Consequently, it takes forgiveness and mercy to relieve them of punishment, pain, suffering, etc. This is what they must show to the Zionists to gain the upper moral hand, which as I mentioned in my last comment reply to you, is the thing the Zionists fear most: not measuring up and with everyone knowing it.

It's a good thing to come to realize if the object is to clean up and fly right.

The Babylonian Talmudists worked overtime conjuring up some of the most ridiculous, convoluted, wholly rationalized concepts in order to "trick" themselves into believing that the character flaws they didn't want to overcome were actually sanctioned by reason of superiority, even over God in some cases (nothing more arrogant coming out from an inferiority complex than that).

This is what they don't want to come out where they will have no choice but to face it.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.