Arkansas US-Senate fight fuels White House/labor family feud - POLITICO.com


Tom Usher wrote or added | This article has helped reinforce what I already knew and that is, with few exceptions, Barack Obama is Bill Clinton and George W. Bush rolled into one. Wow, I hate this politics!

To top it off though, even though I'm for the working class in a huge way, unionization stands in the way of a sort of council communism (http://libcom.org/thought/council-communism-an-introduction) with which I largely agree but certainly without any resorting to violent revolution and, of course in my case, giving credit to that which is beyond mere matter. I'm no materialist. The spirit (beyond matter) is real.

Earl Cohen: The question has become, "How shall we deal with this situation?"

Aren't time, space, and matter all part of the One? Can we separate them?

Question: Is what is Unseen to humans immaterial to the Universal Self?

I would not advocate violent overthrow of government, especially given the machinery that reinforces the elites, but are there at this moment in the history of civilization other alternatives? The only one I can visualize is education of and clarity of understanding among the masses.

Tom Usher

To my mind, the most important things we can do are twofold.

First, we keep saying these things openly, which used to be easily marginalized but no longer (at least for awhile) what with the advent of the Internet. The greedy, of course, will continue to work to make the Internet a series of privatized toll roads, not that it's nationalized now but at least somewhat protected by forces in favor of Net Neutrality, something I doubt is new to you, as I see that you are a wide-ranging reader.

Second, in every bit of our individual walks, we must try to bring forth voluntary communal ownership. That second part has often, as you are no doubt aware, been met with violence on the part of rabid laissez-faire feudalists.

I have tried to get others interested in what I've been calling the Christian Commons, but alas, "Christian" has been given a bad name by those who down through the centuries have been violent and selfish in it's name. Consequently, many people are turned off by the term, especially in Europe, even though I'm sure the gap is bridgeable via increasing semantical understanding. Jesus was/is definitely a communist.

Regardless, I don't for a moment say that many of the more mundane aspects of my vision for the commons should not be employed by non-Christians. All other things being equal, I would rather live on a non-violent, non-coercive, secular commons where I'm still free to believe in God and Jesus (such as I do) than under the current "American" system.

I've pondered the Peace Churches, such as the various communal or communist (non-Marxist) Anabaptist sects; but I can't agree with, among other things, the levels of fundamentalism/literalism and lack of outside engagement.

With your surname, I see that you are from the bloodline of the Jewish temple priests; but from your Info page, I saw that you said that all is one. In my view and in the final analysis, that defines God. How do we as humanity become one soul? How do we all get on the same page so that violence, greed, and whatever is harmful between and amongst us is no more but rather everyone is served by each and all as kings and queens, so to speak?

Healing the sociopathic mind and heart is the order of the day. They don't think with the most highly evolved portions of their brain matter. They don't seem to respond to being informed of that, at least so far. I think that's because the idea hasn't gone openly knowingly viral. People are reluctant to be real radicals. They want the comfort of their friends nodding in agreement rather than looking confused or rejected/rejecting.

That said, the libertarian/objectivists (Ayn Rand-minded) will plateau shortly. The youth are every bit as open to socialism now, if not more so, what with the financial crash that is far from over.

The advantage the libertarian capitalists have though is that those at the top of the corporations know that the little fry down below hollering for complete deregulation just plays into the monopolists' hands. They'll let those duped libertarians have plenty of air time and print space on the major media just so long as they don't talk too much anti-war. The corporate weapons contractors feeding the Pentagon and much of the rest of the world with their utterly vile devices can't use that.

Those same corporatists though can't afford for real socialism to get a full airing because, as you know, real socialism would mean their downfall from their pinnacle seats atop their Ponzi schemes of mammon.

"Alternative" news and commentary is our approach and has been working somewhat. Although, it's so cliquish that one might even call it incestuous. It's also still dominated by money from selling capitalist goods and services, such as ads. I've had Google ads running on my site for years for instance, not that it's been worth it even in the most capitalistic sense. It hasn't. I just wanted to translate some "earnings," any surplus earnings, into the commons. Doing so would help to hasten the end of the capitalist system that I truly hate.

I can't express how much I despise it. They'll be putting meters on all the air and sunlight if we don't stop them.

Good to make your Facebook acquaintance, Earl,

Tom

Tom Usher

As for your questions: "Aren't time, space, and matter all part of the One? Can we separate them" and "Is what is Unseen to humans immaterial to the Universal Self," let me say that time, space, and matter as those would be acceptably defined by Chris Hitchens, for one, are part of the One provided it is understood that God is not dependent upon them but they dependent upon God. God is both before and after those things.

Now, let me also say that here we run into semantics because you and I can use the term "time" such that the connotation transcends the definition acceptable to those who reject spirit that is apart from the material. God is in Einsteinian time but is not limited to the "laws" that scientists have associated with it.

There are connotations of God. There is a place/context that is completely proper where "God" is not in any evil such that when evil is in us and we are doing evil, God is not in us or being reflected in our acts.

Peace,

Tom

Earl Cohen Tom, just got in...need to sleep. Just wanted to check in and let you know I'll respond later this evening or tomorrow. The only exception I see in how we think is in your view on time and good and evil. I'll respond later after I awake. Your thoughts and mine are mostly aligned.

Spent the day visiting local schools drumming up support for our community's version of American Idol. Can you believe? I was asked to volunteer to serve on this year's committee and be one of the judges. That'll teach me for becoming involved in community affairs :)

Peace.

Earl Cohen Tom, just got in...need to sleep. Just wanted to check in and let you know I'll respond later this evening or tomorrow. The only exception I see in how we think is in your view on time and good and evil. I'll respond later after I awake. Your thoughts and mine are mostly aligned.

Spent the day visiting local schools drumming up support for our community's version of American Idol. Can you believe? I was asked to volunteer to serve on this year's committee and be one of the judges. That'll teach me for becoming involved in community affairs :)

Peace.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.