Total Obfuscator: Alan Simpson: Cutting Social Security Benefits to "Take Care of the Lesser People in Society" | FDL

Tom Usher wrote or added | I saw this video over on YouTube yesterday and was amazed that Alan Simpson is let out in public to speak for the government let alone put in co-charge of making the recommendations for balancing the federal budget on the backs of Social Security promisees.

You hear and see here that Alan Simpson says out of one side of his mouth that he's not going to recommend balancing the federal general-revenue budget on the backs of Social Security retirees and then turns around and speaks out of the other side saying that they have to deal with the general budget deficit by including raising the retirement age rather than by the best means. Okay, so he says there are 15 proposals on the table in the commission meetings. Well, he's mentioned the one that is sure to be offered up, and that is cutting on the back of people who would otherwise have retired before 70 or whatever age, Simpson and his cronies pick rather than clawing back all the money stolen from the people's government by the banksters.

Alan Simpson knows damn well that the whole financial collapse was orchestrated for just this very reason, so the superrich banksters could devour huge portions of the national pie while people who have worked decades at manual labor, some of it very strenuous and taxing on the body (wear and tear), will get less and fight over lesser wages just to eek out a living if possible right up to the moment they expire.

Alan Simpson is an economic vampire and hit man for the superrich. He likes to use the term bullshit. Well, he's full of it.

Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid would all work just fine going out into the future if the banksters and their cronies and henchmen were not in charge.

Entitlements should not be dealt with by some side committee. They should be sacrosanct unless put to a general, popular referendum. Only after considering all the other alternatives should Social Security be altered. There are plenty of alternatives, such as nationalizing the Federal Reserve System ASAP and doing away with all interest on the National Debt by doing away with that National Debt. All Federal Reserve Notes should immediately be declared interest-free United States Notes and use to pay off all debt with the exception of paying any of the fraudsters who deliberately crashed the system.

No austerity is necessary. It's all an artificial construct designed for the sole purpose of paying people who do little to nothing but sit around conjuring up other ways to get more of the pie for doing more of the same: little to nothing.

The world mixed economy is a Ponzi scheme. It's a fake, a fraud, unnecessary. We don't need this system at all. It's all a scam by the greediest of the greedy. Dump it.

Let them come down to Earth where they can live as the rest of us. That way, all ships will rise with the tide rather than those who deserve it least living in the clouds while those who work the hardest, who are more honest by far, live with the water rising with their feet chained to the ground and with the water being polluted by those living in the clouds who don't give a damn about anything until it hits them directly.

They are incapable of thinking with the more evolved portions of their brains. Their thoughts and feelings dwell in those areas that care the least about others. Others are the "lesser people," to repeat Alan Simpson's disgusting view of the masses of humanity called his fellow Americans. He means they are lesser because they have less in the way of financial means. They have less because others take more and then block the way to keep it that way.

They're evil-minded. Their hearts are cold, small, and hard. They should not be in charge.

The fact that Alan Simpson is co-chair of that group, as appointed by Barack Obama, speaks more volumes about Obama. He's a disaster. He can't handle Israel or end the wars or fix the civil-rights nightmare or stop the stupid oil leak in the Gulf.

Plug that damn thing, already! Idiots!!!


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in United States Notes. Bookmark the permalink.