Robert Nimmich August 5 at 6:42am
I agree that while in this Age, Zionism is to our eyes no better than Barabbas or Judas seeking to make a kingdom by forced obedience, but in the SECOND coming of Christ, the Lamb becomes the Lion of Judah and the bloodshed will be so great, the blood will rise to the bridal bits of the horses. Not all Jews are Christians, but all Christians are Jews for God does not lie for it is written "He is a Jew who is one inwardly." That circumcision of the heart not of the flesh. After all, what made Abraham a Jew? Faith in God. So it's a double sided coin today ... One man may contribute to Zionism thinking he will force something, another in his heart knows that God is sovereign in all things, and though many in Israel do not believe yet, it is quite written that many WILL as they are in great grief ( bitterness) for what was done to the Son of God who was pierced. Pray for the peace of Jerusalem, those that love thee shall prosper. So what you say for this age is true, while also God is not bound to what you see, for the gifts and callings of God are without repentance. -Robert
Tom Usher August 5 at 6:06pm
You wrote, "...the Lamb becomes the Lion of Judah and the bloodshed will be so great...."
The tares are separated out. Today's unrepentant blind-and-deaf-to-God Zionists are tares. Real Zionists are real Christians are real Jews are real, period. All else is false.
The real lamb has always been the real lion. The issue is human kind taking lives — the wheat with the tares. I judge and condemn no man.
Do we agree, or are we of different spirits worshiping different Gods?
If one comes claiming to be the "Second Coming" and that one takes one innocent one, one repentant one, one reachable one, that "Second Coming" will be known as a fake. Which unrepentant blind-and-deaf-to-God Zionist is unreachable?
This is my stand no matter what.
Peace is the way,
Robert Nimmich August 5 at 9:40pm
I received Jesus as Lord and savior believing in his blood shed for the remission of my sins and was converted, born again, in 1965. I remember the day and moment quite well. I was given spiritual gifts in The Holy Spirit according to his will, one of which is the discernment of spirits. I came to a saving knowledge of Christ by first approaching God in prayer, knowing that God is love, but also just and holy, and required punishment for sin. I honestly, believing in his love, asked him how to reconcile it, and he by knowledge or inspiration opened my remembrance to go into my great grandmother's bedroom where there was a picture in a drawer from the funeral of a relative of Jesus with the crown of thorns on the Cross. I'd heard the Gospel and that moment I believed and understood. The Scripture says that God is able to graft Israel in again if they abide not in unbelief. So I quite agree I do not judge their hearts. Many are ridiculously religious not unlike the Scribes and Pharisees, but many are also very honest and open and truly interested in the weightier matters of the law, such as justice and mercy, and I have no doubt the Spirit is leading them to salvation in Christ. I believe it is that time, which is to say that the time of the Gentiles is fulfilled, and the gentile church definitely is not continuing in God's goodness , which is purely Grace of the Gospel, and have turned to a new set of laws even making the Epistles from the Apostles out to be some new set of rules and laws that require man's self effort to gain admission into the kingdom of heaven. And other justifying Sin verbatim which I'm not sure has ever been seen in Church History. Some fundamentalists even grossly pervert the word of God to suit their own traditions of what they good and bad behavior even making out the Lord Jesus himself to be a sinner by their rules, thus rejecting the tender nature of voluntary submission of moderation and sanctification through faith in the Shed Blood of Christ. God doesn't need a new set of people following the letter of new old laws, for Israel is already the Natural Branch as it is. I am purely saying that if God wants to regather Israel and unify the land at this time, as has been his intention since Abraham, he's not going to wait for their conversion to Christ; but so that he gets the glory and not them, he will regather them and then open their hearts and understanding to the Gospel after he has done it in a manner they can only give him glory and not themselves. If they believe God's word to the best of their understanding and sincerely are turning to him, which is the Spirit I have witnessed, I have no doubt they will soon be saved , as it is prophesied. I am very excited about the Gospel of Jesus Christ and I am very excited at the prospect of Jewish people receiving their very own Messiah And Savior Jesus Christ, for it is their very possession FIRST and then the Gentile after. They do no harm keeping the Land of Israel in the Name of the God of Abraham. They do me no harm. If they do not receive Christ I am very sorry for them. Truly there will be many that do not, and they will not be part of the kingdom which descends out of heaven, the heavenly Jerusalem, but many will be a part. But Zionism to my understanding does nothing by honor the God of Abraham, when it is in faith to his word. I was in Jerusalem recently. You cannot separate who has a true religion and who does not by appearance or creed, but only in their actions to their fellow men and then their words, both of which I experienced first hand.
Tom Usher August 5 at 10:10pm
Well, I'm not sure what precipitated your contacting me this way. Perhaps you'll explain. Do you need to refresh my memory concerning where we've interacted before?
Your reply is Reformed, is it not. I detect Calvinism, but correct me if I'm wrong on that. [I now think more Pentecostal]
Are you of the opinion that God caused Herzl? Do you think God is the author of evil?
I also see that you are Pauline. I am not.
As for the political Zionists doing "no harm keeping the Land of Israel in the Name of the God of Abraham," that makes no sense. The political Zionists are doing harm and are not doing anything God wants. They are doing what they want. They are wrong. They should not have done what they have done to the Palestinians or the land.
If they don't harm you, they still harm me, for I am a Christian who has been abused by them in Palestine, just as Jesus said that whatever has been done to the least of the fold has been done to the shepherd.
"But Zionism to my understanding does nothing by honor the God of Abraham...." I don't know what that means. Did you mean "but" rather than "by"? If so, Zionism does nothing to honor the God of Abraham. The God of Abraham took not one innocent life. The Zionists have slaughtered thousands of those who include your supposed Christian brothers and sisters.
If you were in Jerusalem recently, then you are not as I am, for they would look at my open writings on the subject and would be afraid to let me enter and to speak openly to the people.
I think you had a plan to attempt to sway me to accepting the Zionist entity as being mundanely legitimate or ordained of God. I reject both positions for the reasons I've given.
If you are interested in continuing this discussion with me, take it out in the open where others may see what you are saying here and my replies. My blog is full of anti-Zionist posts. Choose one, and I will add these messages to the thread for the world to see.
If this offends you in the least, you are no real Christian.
Shall I post this conversation as a blog post where we can continue?
Robert Nimmich August 6 at 2:52am
You are correct in that I made a typographical error and I meant "but" not by. I do not agree with your assertion of "slaughter" and you will answer to God directly for your words as shall we all. If you mean by "Pauline" you mean the Apostle Paul, he is a Pillar in the Kingdom of Heaven made so by Christ. I have already shared our conversation with others, and your test as to my Christianity is not valid. Tthat authority has not been given to you make a new test to suit your religion whatever it is. The test of the Spirit is whether a man confesses Jesus Is Lord which I have already done. I do not care to continue this conversation with you.
Tom Usher August 6 at 5:25am
You started this. I'll finish it.
You don't think the Zionists have slaughtered people. You're a political-Zionist apologist unwilling to call what they are doing to the Palestinians what it is, that is abject murder including of little children and babies and pregnant women and the old and infirmed.
The Zionists are racists, liars, ethnic cleansers, land thieves, war criminals, who would engage in wholesale slaughter — that's genocide — out of their greedy, dark, Satanic spirit if given the chance. Jesus called the Talmudists "serpents." The "Jews" in their self-authorized "Israel" are nothing but Talmudists — traditionalists who made up all sorts of lies about Jesus. They need to stop, turn, repent, and atone. Yet you side with them before you can possibly walk with me. Well go on. Don't speak truth. You go with them where they're headed. See where it gets you.
As for your sharing this and then saying that my "test" as to your Christianity is not valid, it doesn't matter how many people you get to tell you that. It is absolutely valid to tell you that if you are offended about taking this back-and-forth public then you are no real Christian. Try reading Jesus on the subject about hiding the light. Then tell me about it. This was no pastoral counseling session where things are to remain confidential. This was you challenging me. It was completely obvious from the start. I've had plenty of your kind make these attempts. All have failed. They've all done exactly what you've done. Try to hit and then duck and run away unable to support their false beliefs — nasty spirits — not interested in helping to bring forth.
You don't know what authority has or hasn't been given to me. Who do you think you are?
You are completely wrong that the test is confessing Jesus as Lord. Any liar can do that.
You come off as a closet Zionist troll — full of crap. Share that! I will since you've no problem with sharing my messages without even asking me first (it's not a hard and fast rule anyway). You are a hit-and-run artist — a coward who can quote a little but can't stand and defend. I see no Christian in you. I see no Holy Spirit in your writings.
As for "Pauline," try studying the matter. You haven't yet. You see nothing contradictory in the writings attributed to him? You're blind.
I know who you are, and you're no brother in Christ of mine.
You're a ducker. Jesus never ducked. I don't duck either.
When you grow up and want to face things for real, let me know.
This hasn't been a conversation. This has been you slinking in and then being exposed and rebuked because everything you said here in an attempt to pull me down with you has failed miserably. You came to attack. Don't deny it. Don't be in denial. Snap out of your delusion. That's what you had on your mind. You did not have making friends with a fellow Christian in mind at all. It's completely obvious.
You don't know your scripture. You don't have the law written on your heart. You have sound bites written on it, not the Spirit of Truth.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)