Tom Usher wrote or added | The argument over whether or not to have a full investigation of 9/11 may be the strangest thing in my lifetime so far.
"Day Of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor," by Robert Stinnett (the book is far more compelling than the article makes it appear to be: http://en.wikipedia.org/wi
If you research the McCollum Memo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wi
Now, since this is all true, why can't 9/11 have any inside-job aspects to it? No one has ever offered up a reasonable possible explanation. All I've ever heard is just dismissing everything that has never been explained. The molten-metal pools under the buildings and running that hot for weeks just makes no sense if the planes were the only instruments for bringing down all the buildings, including 7.
Even if one is not a "Truther," why would one not want answers to the questions or at least get to the point where the government says it can't explain (won't divulge)?
If the only thing that stood between Operation Northwoods https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods being carried out or not was John Kennedy's yea or nay, which it was, then why can't anyone imagine George W. Bush being offered the same and saying, "Do it"? Other President said, "Do it" concerning many other false-flag operations. That's well documented. The article on Operation Northwoods says, "The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense." That means that only the executive stood in the way. It is my understanding that Kennedy saw it and rejected it. If you read the article, you will see that the plan was submitted in 1962 but that it wasn't until a different investigation into the assassination of Kennedy that the Operation Northwoods plan became public in 1997. Why should we have to wait that long this time concerning 9/11? Why are anti-Truthers so hell bent on helping the system to cover its tracks until after everyone responsible for dirty work is dead or too old and until the next generation has lost all sense of continuity with the event and history, etc.?
At the very least, Operation Northwoods shows that such elaborate plans have been conjured up and offered to Presidents. Let's not forget that the Gulf of Tonkin was a farce too. What would all the 9/11 Truth naysayers have said back then if people had started claiming that the Gulf of Tonkin was a farce? They would have said pretty much exactly what they are saying today about 9/11.
Oh, in the first attack on the World Trade Center back in 1993 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_1993_bombings#FBI_involvement and http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html?pagewanted=all), it was the FBI that supplied the live explosives. The FBI infiltrated a group and then supplied the live explosive and allowed the whole plan to be carried off. Did you know that? Most people don't know it. A freelancer, Emad A. Salem, with the FBI working on the inside double checked with higher-ups because he thought the FBI could supply fake explosives as originally planned. He was overridden. Six people died. Innocent American civilians were murdered and more than 1,000 were injured, some severely maimed. The building almost came down. The explosive was just parked in the wrong spot, but (part of) the FBI gave (their fellow) terrorists enough explosive material to have brought down the building killing everyone above and below and who knows outside and in other buildings.
You still don't want an investigation into 9/11 though? As I said, that may be the strangest thing in my lifetime so far.