Forum: Is there any truth to 9/11 Conspiracy Theories? P1


Tom Usher commented or added the following:

Oh, the 9/11 Truthers here certainly have the facts on their side to support that we need a new, but this time independent-criminal investigation where all leads are followed, all unanswered questions are properly addressed and answered where possible, without any recourse to the lame, censoring excuse of National Security and state secrets.

Chris 'Pyrate' McCabe

But who's gonna pay the piper, & how to guarantee independence of investigation?

Tom Usher

Hello Chris,

Are we looking to punish, or do we believe that those who hear the truth but ignore it will receive their reward regardless of any punishments humans mete out to fellow humans? How do we avoid taking the wheat with the tares? Punishing the innocent is an abomination.

Islam screams for justice, and there is supposedly the admonition within Islam not to punish the innocent; yet, in Islamic wars are 100% of the innocent spared?

When Mohammed took captives from the wars he started and kept them or sold them into bondage, even raping the women and girls, were those captives not punished for crimes they often had not committed? Are we Christians or Muslims? We cannot be both.

What is the just punishment for each guilty soul? Which of us has a history free of sin? How many of us have escaped punishment? How many of us is God forgiving and showing mercy? Now do we want to turn around and beat the guilty and/or hang them?

Independence is either granted or not. There's no mystery here.

When the investigative team must be comprised also of those who were blocked (the whistleblowers and best Truthers, etc.) and the team issues no complaints not addressed to the proper and reasonable satisfaction of the people in general including such as the Jersey Girls, would the cover-up continue with ultimate success?

I am looking for truth (and reconciliation where possible). I am not looking for punishment.

When does humanity rise in spirit rather than remain unconscionable?

The reason all the evils are happening is because human standards are way too low. Our job is to raise them. We don't do that by beating and killing each other. We have had the low standard for recorded history. It isn't good enough. It isn't worthy of repentance.

Do you agree?

Chris, you know that's not a rhetorical question.

Peace of the LORD and Lord if you will accept,

Tom

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.