Tom Usher commented or added the following:
Making sons effeminate on purpose, directly contrary to the vast majority of predispositions and as if masculine boys and men can't be non-violent or compassionate, etc., is a grave error.
It does though fly in the face of the homosexuality-is-genetic-o
If the idea is to make boys into more peaceful men via some psychological naming-convention, then having
on the current top-10-names list better cause some reflection on actual history.
Consider Alexander the Great, so-called, who was a homosexual. Also consider William the Conqueror, who swooped in on England to establish himself as an Emperor ushering in the huge evil that is serfdom and helping to kill the anti-elitist, beautiful commons. Then there's Joshua, who according to the Old Testament Bible, committed literal genocide a number of times without batting an eye and whose name according to the article author, Pamela Redmond Satran, has a softer sound and/or vowel ending.